|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 27, 2014, 06:41 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
|
“Do you support increased gun control?” map
http://www.isidewith.com/map/5i5/sup...or-gun-control
Interesting color coded Map for the support of gun control. This is a congressional district result from a total of 1.227 million since 2013. The question was “Do you support increased gun control?” I found it rather surprising and I bet the Brady bunch are not happy with it. Also not surprising is the locations that are showing the most for gun control is California and the north east coast and a small aria around Chicago.
__________________
It was a sad day when I discovered my universal remote control did not in fact control the universe. Did you hear about the latest study.....5 out of 6 liberals say that Russian Roulette is safe. |
December 27, 2014, 09:35 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
What's surprising to me is that southern AZ and northern NM are strongly pro-control. Also, ALL of NH and ALL of ME.
Disappointing ... |
December 28, 2014, 10:16 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2010
Posts: 857
|
Quote:
Rio Rancho / Albuquerque have a lot of people that have moved in from California and New York. Santa Fe has a lot of people from California - including a whole group of movie star types. Los Alamos is the home of the "propeller heads" that have PhD's and have moved in from all over the U.S. |
|
December 28, 2014, 10:20 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2000
Posts: 4,193
|
Many people think that "more gun control" means stopping the illegal use of guns in violent crime when in reality it means just further limiting the already law abiding citizen. Results of these questions are often skewed.
__________________
Pilot |
December 28, 2014, 10:32 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,946
|
Many of these areas are more urban where people see guns as a tool of the criminal and not as an item to be used in recreational activities or even self defense. While I agree many are naive in believing that more gun control will reduce crime. However, I think we should realize that their fears are often real and based on what they see on a daily basis in their communities. This is an area that we as firearms enthusiast need to petition organizations and leaders that represent our position to improve educational and outreach in these communities.
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman |
December 28, 2014, 11:11 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2011
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
|
|
December 28, 2014, 11:49 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Such a question is always useless. Legit and nonagenda surveys find that:
1. People with support more gun control if it keeps criminals or nuts from having guns. 2. The majority of folks (who do support #1) and those who don't want more control are in favor of allowing law abiding citizens to own guns for SD and sport. Their degree of control might vary but they are not total gun banners. The implication from agenda polls is that total bans are wanted - which isn't the case.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
December 28, 2014, 12:25 PM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
When it comes to these kinds of polls, what exact questions asked, and the context matter, and what the respondent thinks is the right answer, and what the pollsters present to us as the results may not be the same thing, or even close.
Glenn gets it, as do some of the rest of us. What is asked, and how, matters, and many, many "polls" are skewed to produce desired results. One excellent example of this that has stuck with me is a Doonesbury cartoon from the early 70s. Doonesbury is acting as a poll taker, door to door, and reads the question... "If the election were held tomorrow, who would you vote for?" A) Santa Claus B) The Easter Bunny C) Richard Nixon to which, the homeowner replies... "hmm let me think about that..." Doonesbury then thinks.. "This is going to be tougher than I thought..." I hope you can see the message here... Another "example" of polling, one I personally know about, from the Clinton years. An old boy I knew, farmer, about a political as a rock, got on the list, and began getting calls from polls, asking him how he felt about the job Pres Clinton was doing. He didn't really care much, so he said he thought the Pres was doing a good job. They called him every two or three months, for years. He always said the same thing. Then, just to be contrary, he decided to tell them he thought the Pres was doing a terrible job. They NEVER called back after that. Polls are wonderful things, as long as you realize that the reported results can be smoke and mirrors. the only poll that really matters is the one we have every couple years in November.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
December 28, 2014, 12:39 PM | #9 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
There's also a serious issue with the sample group. Here's what the iSideWith.com map legend says. (My emphasis underlined.)
Quote:
Furthermore... Quote:
It's also unclear how the website filters out duplicate "spoiler" votes, other than this vague and uninformative statement on their FAQ: Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|||
December 28, 2014, 02:34 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Do I dare expose the ugly truth? Polls(ters) lie...
Do I dare expose the ugly truth? Many of these polls on guns aren't worth the paper they're (not printed on).
"I side with...", "Survey Monkey" and other internet based survey tools are very often contrived-results-oriented survey tools with anticipated (predestined?) results (was that tactful enough but still get the point across?). I've personally seen an advocacy group manipulate these polls in 2 ways: 1)They ask a question that appears innocuous but is prime facia biased: ("Can you name a worse president *in your lifetime* than George W. Bush (obama)?", asked to 18-25 year olds. (Since few 18 year olds remember a president before GWB they have 2 choices, nearly all name the current president or Bush))etc, or vice versa. 2) They use specific social media techniques to get specific but susceptible respondents to flood the responses with suggested / expected answers, in at least one instance offering prizes for the most (100's) responses. Further, there is at least one company in India that can guarantee you any number of like-minded responses to a poll for literally pennies per vote, and the IP addresses will appear to be from targeted location for a bit more. Be careful of anything you see as author active on the Internet.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
December 28, 2014, 03:11 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
|
I have found that the people that don't have guns or say they don't like guns, are none the less fascinated by them. Most of the movies and television programs they watch involve firearms that are essential to the storyline. Odd, isn't it? Like, "ethical", vegetarians that wear leather shoes.....
|
December 28, 2014, 08:26 PM | #12 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
New Mexico has three congressional districts. The district in which Albuquerque is located is relatively compact, leaving the rest of the state divided into two districts, roughly north of Albuquerque and south of Albuquerque. It looks like the 2nd district (to the south) is less inclined toward gun control, but the 1st (Albuquerque) and 3rd (Sante Fe and north) are coded the same color. That's the district that includes Questa, Eagle Nest, Farmington ... as well as Gallup. And it came as a big surprise to me to see that part of the state checking in as equally pro-gun control as Albuquerque. |
|
December 28, 2014, 08:30 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: November 21, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 23
|
Don't be fooled. The anti-gun crowd won't be happy until all guns are out of private hands. They will try and pass more laws until their objective is complete.
__________________
"You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" Ronald Reagan |
December 28, 2014, 08:39 PM | #14 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
I'm still trying to figure out, though, how they got two out of the three people in Maine's 2nd District to vote pro-control. |
|
December 29, 2014, 03:54 AM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 22, 2014
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,549
|
I could not even get the pos map to work for my state.
|
December 29, 2014, 08:04 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
Quote:
|
|
December 31, 2014, 10:16 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
|
The enlightened/progressives tend to favor controls that are sticter or perhaps about the same as present. It has always been an illusion that stricter controls means lower crime and criminal use of firearms. The more rural areas generally favor the same or less control for the exact opposite reasons.
I keep hearing the broadcasters when talking about NYC and the police protecting the citizens. Not so.... anywhere, they only enforce the law. Protection by law enforcement is an illusion unless you believe their presence means protection. I view it more as a deterrent. |
December 31, 2014, 01:27 PM | #18 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
Quote:
Protection for the general public is the illusion. Or, more accurately, they do try, it just doesn't succeed for everyone. The illusion is the belief that it does.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
January 1, 2015, 09:24 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 24
|
I don't know where and/or how the data was collected but I guarantee it is wrong for the state of Maine.
|
January 1, 2015, 03:04 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,089
|
<---------political science major whose favorite class was "Public Opinion & Propaganda".
Any public opinion survey can be tailored to get the results you want by how you present each question. The question "Do you support increased gun control?" may mean different things to different responders: Some may interpret that to mean: -more laws -actual enforcement of existing laws But it ignores the reasoning behind why people might want "gun control".....criminals. When the question includes the word GUN, it isn't about the criminal but an inanimate object. MADD doesn't run polls asking "Do you support increased laws to keep cars away from drunk drivers?" They don't demonize what kills people, but WHO kills people. Show me any opinion poll or survey and it's pretty easy to see the bias in the questions.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
January 1, 2015, 03:54 PM | #21 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
||
January 1, 2015, 05:16 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
Quote:
I left what I wrote after I read your your post as a reminder to myself to read the thread before posting... |
|
January 2, 2015, 06:39 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
I always love the color maps that show our nation rotting at the edges (if we'd chosen a circular geography, we wouldn't have half the problems we do ).
Thank you, whoever made this, for not doing it in a green/red gradient for us colorblind folks (although, the blue/red on the gradient is reversed, for reasons that should be obvious ) TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
January 10, 2015, 06:16 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 168
|
West Virginia
I see my state Is completely and proudly in the blue. GO WV!!
|
January 11, 2015, 08:58 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2013
Posts: 525
|
Jimmy Kimmel made a joke of how polling questions can skew results. They polled people about the insurance coverage issue. They got very different results depending on if they called it Obamacare or if they called it the Affordable Care Act.
I support more gun control in some respects and less in others. I will not support an increase in gun control unless I see it written clearly and firmly into law that said control is guaranteed to stop at a certain point. Right now, it's pretty clear that it's not gun control vs gun ownership rights, but gun banning vs gun ownership. I have no faith the so called do-gooders have any intentions of stopping at a reasonable point. |
|
|