The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting > Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 27, 2015, 07:29 PM   #1
riverratt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2014
Posts: 314
real quick question on alloys

I see it all the time, 95/5/1 will yield X BHN, or whatever. I have tried finding some basic info but Can't seem find it. Is this measured by volume, or weight? I'm assuming Volume because of the density difference between tin and lead but you know what they say about assuming.
riverratt is offline  
Old February 27, 2015, 08:30 PM   #2
Vance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2011
Location: North Bend, OR
Posts: 743
I always assumed it was by weight. It is based on percentages. 96% lead 2% tin and 2% antimony = 100%. That would be different amount depending on if you go by weight or volume. I'm curious now too.
Vance is offline  
Old February 27, 2015, 08:32 PM   #3
3kgt2nv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: hudson valley NY
Posts: 517
its usually parts. 94 lead 5 tin 1 antimony etc so it doesn't matter what weight of lead your melting its just the ratio your looking at.

1000 pounds is mixed the same as 1 pound.

96 2 2 or 94 4 2 usually.

if your using recovered range lead this is kind of spotty as you cant know the percentages of alloy after it is melted down.

personally I have found recovered range led is usually hard enough for most bullets except for magnum loads
3kgt2nv is offline  
Old February 27, 2015, 08:52 PM   #4
Vance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2011
Location: North Bend, OR
Posts: 743
http://thefiringline.com/forums/arch...?t-456726.html
I found this in the archives. Seems to be by weight like I thought.
Vance is offline  
Old February 27, 2015, 08:57 PM   #5
Vance
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2011
Location: North Bend, OR
Posts: 743
Lyman #2 is 5% tin 5% antimony and 90% lead. I think what riverrat was asking is do you measure by weight or by volume. My research says by weight. So Lyman #2 would be 5 pounds tin, 5 pounds antimony and 90 pounds lead to equal 100 pounds. I used those numbers to keep it simple.
Vance is offline  
Old February 28, 2015, 12:29 AM   #6
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
Here's a great read on alloys and hardness with charts:
http://www.lasc.us/Fryxell_Book_Chap...Metallurgy.htm
Be sure to read through all the chapters if you have time.

Another chapter here has some mixture formulas using Rotometals Hard to get desired hardness: http://www.lasc.us/SuperHard.htm#recipes

An awesome place for anything casting or swaging to bullet molds and design here: http://castboolits.gunloads.com/

Some notes worth mentioning ( I am far from being an expert):
Different Mixtures will cast better at different temperatures. So if you change the formula, you may need to adjust the temp. Also may need to adjust temp when moving from one bullet caliber to another. Most of that is touched upon in the first read link I posted or in the other chapters there.

You can get most of what you need from clip on wheel weights if casting for standard pistol calibers. You can get a harder BHN by water dropping and super hard by heat treating them. Also pointed out in the chapters from the first link .
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11276 seconds with 8 queries