|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 26, 2014, 12:52 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: January 29, 2014
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 37
|
My SAGA with my M70 Jack O'Connor is over
I won't go into all of the details on how I ended up at this point, you can look back at previous posts and see the trail. But here is where the trail shall end, for me anyway. The rifle came back after about 8 months for repairs on the stock. The metalwork was fixed very well, the barrel floats perfectly, the finish on the gun is above average and the checkering looks like it was done with a pocketknife by a drunk, in the dark. I've got pictures and I do hope to post them here. If not, I'll post them on the website I open up based on this experience. The tradjedy for me is that I'll never be able to buy another Model 70, Model 94, Super X or any other Winchester/Browning related products without holding them in my hands first. Over the decades I have probably filled at least 3 of my safes via Gunbroker and other online auctions, but not anymore. This experience fixed that for me. If you want a quality gun, you better go find it. Never had any trouble with Weatherby or Kimber rifles online and all the Browning shotguns I have purchased have served me well, but that was then and this is now. I'll take no more chances. The gun doesn't look horrible to the point that you couldn't hunt with it, I just can't. I'll hate it evertime I look at it and think of all the hassle I went through and all the money I spent on something that is of inferior quality to a standard M70 being produced right now (at least I hope it is). Don't think I'll ever shoot it. I'll just hold it till someone buys it, and we all know someone eventually will. The only question is how much will I lose in all of this? Never again!file:///C:/Users/Jim/Desktop/2.jpg
Last edited by NavyChief; July 26, 2014 at 01:05 AM. |
July 26, 2014, 01:03 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: January 29, 2014
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 37
|
pictures of checkering on my JOC rifle
|
July 26, 2014, 06:18 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 2,450
|
i agree,it looks bad. eastbank.
|
July 26, 2014, 10:04 AM | #4 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
"Good help is hard to find."
|
July 26, 2014, 03:26 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2002
Posts: 108
|
I've been hoping for an update for a while, as it seemed like it was about time, but this isn't what I'd hoped to hear... I can only imagine your disppointment.
It's a shame that they can try so hard, yet still fail to deliver. It's still a beautiful rifle though. Think of it like Cindy Crawford's mole |
July 26, 2014, 03:56 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 924
|
Chief;
It may be worthy to go here: http://www.checkering.com/ and talk to Sherry. she claims that she can improve or re-cut poorly done checkering. Her work photos really look good. She was the head checker'er at Kimber in her past.
__________________
Trigger control + Breath control + Sight alignment = Gun Control. http://www.hrpclub.info/ NRA Smallbore Prone Master, High Power Master |
July 26, 2014, 06:49 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,766
|
NavyChief, I've followed your story with interest and am sorry to hear the results. It is ashamed that a company like Winchester/Browning can't do a better job to satisfy a customer and it's a story that is going to greatly influence my decision to ever buy their products again in the future. When you are being charged a premium price for a premium rifle you should get what you pay for. Good luck in the future sir.
|
July 27, 2014, 08:14 AM | #8 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
AllenJ, it appears that the real problem stems from a purchase of an item without seeing it, first. Navy Chief's problem came from a section of Winchester wherein they could not perform in a competent manner. I don't see that as a blanket indictment of the entire production.
Maybe it's just me; I've always been a "feel and fondle" sort when it comes to my firearms. |
July 27, 2014, 09:35 PM | #9 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
But isn't hand cut checkering always better?
Jim |
July 28, 2014, 07:14 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,766
|
I'm sorry Art but I have to disagree. He bought the rifle sight unseen but then returned it to have repairs made, and they sent that. I do agree that it came from a "section" of Winchester but refuse to support any section of a company that allows that type of quaility at that price to leave its facility, twice no less.
|
July 28, 2014, 11:31 AM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 13, 2014
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 2,187
|
They screwed you to be sure. However, if all of us had a nickel for everytime someone screwed us, we could all retire in luxury. Sorry to hear.
Also, to be fair, the checkering is much better than I can do with a pocket knife in the light - and I don't drink. |
July 28, 2014, 01:51 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Posts: 3,057
|
Maybe it is just me, but I generally don't buy hunting rifles... or any gun really for how it looks, but yours still doesn't look bad at all to me. I have old Sako's and everything else I don't even take out in the woods anymore, for risk of ruining them. If you are a guy who walks 40 yards to and from his stand than sure, but I do not do that. I wouldn't bother being upset over cosmetics if the gun is truly to be hunted with.
I am sorry you are dissatisfied, but I can't really relate. I have expensive rifles too, Kimber rifles as you mentioned. But I hike / hunt, so I bought the Mountain Ascent most recently. |
July 29, 2014, 12:14 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 10, 2010
Posts: 1,149
|
Would it be possible to just put a different stock on it, or does that particular stock have meaning?
__________________
Once Fired Brass, Top quality, Fast shipping, Best prices. http://300AacBrass.com/ -10% Coupon use code " badger " |
July 29, 2014, 08:57 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 2,450
|
if you are paying hard earned dollars for a special rifle,why should you not expect it to be have ex metal and wood? if not why would you want to spend your dollars for it when there are plenty of cheaper rifles for half the money that have wood like that. but thats just me. eastbank.
|
July 29, 2014, 10:41 AM | #15 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
AllenJ, in almost sixteen years of moderating threads, from the early days of TFL on through the years here, it seems as though almost all of the hunting rifle manufacturers have had a few lemons, and customer relation problems.
Not just the "majors", but the special-order/custom/quasi-custom folks as well. As a percentage of all their guns, it's not many--but it has happened. And will happen. |
July 31, 2014, 07:27 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
I have a gun smith building me a rifle now, with a mannlicher stock, and he asked if I was going to be hunting with it and I said yes, so he talked me out of getting a high grade wood, and I am thankful for it. |
|
July 31, 2014, 09:37 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
I custom fabricate items for a living. We use old schol hand processes and we use modern processes. The modern processes produce near perfect, cookie cutter products. The old school method produces variations and imperfections that give the product uniqueness and desirability. The hand processed items and their "personality marks" sell for much higher prices than the near perfection produced by automation. If the desired result is perfection, then the item has no personality or uniqueness.
|
August 1, 2014, 05:22 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
|
"It may be worthy to go here: http://www.checkering.com/
and talk to Sherry. she claims that she can improve or re-cut poorly done checkering. Her work photos really look good. She was the head checker'er at Kimber in her past." I met her at a gun show in Portland many years ago. She was free hand working on some junk stocks to show what she could do. I was very impressed with the look of her work... Tony |
|
|