The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 17, 2014, 12:37 AM   #1
Joshua 2415
Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2014
Posts: 82
Why Are Copper Bullets "Deep Penetrating" if They Are Lighter...?

I often see comments or advertising that says copper pullets are deep-penetrating. But, isn't copper lighter than lead? Don't we use heavier bullets when we want more penetration?

If you have a 125 grain copper bullet, and a 125 grain lead bullet, then being the same weight, does the copper bullet really give deeper penetration? If so, what is the technical explanation for this?

And will it "hit" harder, or softer, than a lead round of equal weight? That is, will there be any difference in energy delivered on target...better? worse?

I'm considering using the Buffalo Bore 125 grain Tactical XPB (Copper) Short Barrel round in my 357 magnum. Just want to understand this copper thing better.

Thanks.
Joshua 2415 is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 12:38 AM   #2
4thPoint
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 240
The lead bullets deform and mushroom, which greatly reduces penetration.
Copper bullets do much better at retaining their 'bullet shape' and slipping through tissue.
4thPoint is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 12:55 AM   #3
jason_iowa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 686
They also dont shed weight like lead or jacketed bullets can
jason_iowa is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 04:43 AM   #4
publius
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
See above comments, plus, if you have a 125gr. lead bullet and a 125gr. copper bullet, they weigh the same. Yes, copper is a lighter material, so it has more mass (longer) to achieve the same weight, but it weighs the same.
__________________
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
publius is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 06:56 AM   #5
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
Quote:
They also dont shed weight like lead or jacketed bullets can
This is the key. I have more experience with rifle bullets so I'll answer with examples I know about. Typical lead bullets lose 50% or more of their weight at impact. Some of the better bonded bullets may only lose 20-30%, some of the more explosive designs 80%. A 180 gr bullet @ 3000 fps from a 300 magnum might only weigh 100-140 gr after impact.

I load 130 gr copper bullets in my 308 @ 3050 fps. At closer ranges the impact speed is the same, but the 130 gr copper bullets will still weigh 130 gr after they impact. Penetration and performance on game is about the same.

As mentioned earlier bullet length is a factor. The 130 gr Barnes TTSX's I use are about the same length as 165 gr lead bullets. Longer bullets, even in lead penetrate deeper than short bullets.

The same principle applies to handguns, but I don't think the difference is quite as dramatic. At slower impact speeds lead handgun bullets don't shed weight like faster rifle bullets.

Quote:
Copper bullets do much better at retaining their 'bullet shape' and slipping through tissue.
Somewhat true, but this is one of copper's disadvantages. They need speed to expand. You generally drop down to a lighter copper bullet and shoot it as fast as possible. If they impact too slow you get little or no expansion. Since you don't need the weight for penetration, go lighter and faster with copper for best results.
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 08:17 AM   #6
micromontenegro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2010
Posts: 645
Quick answer: because copper is harder than lead.
micromontenegro is offline  
Old July 18, 2014, 10:12 AM   #7
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,604
Quote:
Yes, copper is a lighter material, so it has more mass (longer) to achieve the same weight, but it weighs the same.
A copper bullet has a greater volume than a lead bullet of the same weight. It has the same mass.
natman is offline  
Old July 18, 2014, 10:02 PM   #8
Super Sneaky Steve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,245
A pure copper 125 bullet is much larger than a 125 lead bullet. Because of this case volume is reduced which all things equal will increase pressure.

It's for this reason that JHP's with a lead core can be driven harder than pure copper bullets.
Super Sneaky Steve is offline  
Old July 18, 2014, 10:17 PM   #9
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
Quote:
Typical lead bullets lose 50% or more of their weight at impact.
In the context of the handgun forum, this statement is somewhat misleading.

The statement is accurate when applied to simple cup & core rifle bullets travelling at relatively high velocity.

These days, using premium (controlled expansion) rifle hunting ammunition or premium self-defense handgun ammunition, it would be pretty unusual to see a 50% weight loss on impact even with a lead core bullet.

Even with fairly simple bullet designs, handgun velocities are generally low enough that it's not common to see bullet weight losses of 50%.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 04:46 AM   #10
Micahweeks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: North Mississippi
Posts: 854
I don't know about the 50% weight loss. The handgun tests I've seen on YouTube with lead ammo have never demonstrated 50% weight loss. They haven't even shown 10%. The last one I watched was a 158 gr. lead hollowpoint. It measured in the high 150's after being recovered. I'm not a "ballistics" guy, so I won't claim to know the why's and if's and becauses of it all, but I do know that those bullets didn't come out of the gel at 80 grains.
Micahweeks is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 09:37 AM   #11
5thShock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 28, 2006
Posts: 400
The pictures of recovered copped bullets often show the expanded petals, these have space between them and their edges look jagged and sharp. The things look like pretty good cutters and cutting through things can take less energy than crushing and pushing things aside so more energy left for penetration. No?
5thShock is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 10:33 AM   #12
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
Mass divided by cross sectional area reflects penetration depth

Taking this to the limit "Assuming" the same mass, an AP round will penetrate further in gel because of the lesser / no deformation properties result in less cross sectional area slowing it down.
Copper will deform a little more, lead more than that (again all other things being equal) and a pressed nickel frangible much less, having the largest cross sectional area after entering the gel / target.

In reality for, ballistics and properties of materials, nothing is linear or equal in real life.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10035 seconds with 10 queries