|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 17, 2014, 12:37 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: March 8, 2014
Posts: 82
|
Why Are Copper Bullets "Deep Penetrating" if They Are Lighter...?
I often see comments or advertising that says copper pullets are deep-penetrating. But, isn't copper lighter than lead? Don't we use heavier bullets when we want more penetration?
If you have a 125 grain copper bullet, and a 125 grain lead bullet, then being the same weight, does the copper bullet really give deeper penetration? If so, what is the technical explanation for this? And will it "hit" harder, or softer, than a lead round of equal weight? That is, will there be any difference in energy delivered on target...better? worse? I'm considering using the Buffalo Bore 125 grain Tactical XPB (Copper) Short Barrel round in my 357 magnum. Just want to understand this copper thing better. Thanks. |
July 17, 2014, 12:38 AM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 28, 2012
Posts: 240
|
The lead bullets deform and mushroom, which greatly reduces penetration.
Copper bullets do much better at retaining their 'bullet shape' and slipping through tissue. |
July 17, 2014, 12:55 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 686
|
They also dont shed weight like lead or jacketed bullets can
|
July 17, 2014, 04:43 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
|
See above comments, plus, if you have a 125gr. lead bullet and a 125gr. copper bullet, they weigh the same. Yes, copper is a lighter material, so it has more mass (longer) to achieve the same weight, but it weighs the same.
__________________
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain |
July 17, 2014, 06:56 AM | #5 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
|
Quote:
I load 130 gr copper bullets in my 308 @ 3050 fps. At closer ranges the impact speed is the same, but the 130 gr copper bullets will still weigh 130 gr after they impact. Penetration and performance on game is about the same. As mentioned earlier bullet length is a factor. The 130 gr Barnes TTSX's I use are about the same length as 165 gr lead bullets. Longer bullets, even in lead penetrate deeper than short bullets. The same principle applies to handguns, but I don't think the difference is quite as dramatic. At slower impact speeds lead handgun bullets don't shed weight like faster rifle bullets. Quote:
|
||
July 17, 2014, 08:17 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2010
Posts: 645
|
Quick answer: because copper is harder than lead.
|
July 18, 2014, 10:12 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,604
|
Quote:
|
|
July 18, 2014, 10:02 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,245
|
A pure copper 125 bullet is much larger than a 125 lead bullet. Because of this case volume is reduced which all things equal will increase pressure.
It's for this reason that JHP's with a lead core can be driven harder than pure copper bullets. |
July 18, 2014, 10:17 PM | #9 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
|
Quote:
The statement is accurate when applied to simple cup & core rifle bullets travelling at relatively high velocity. These days, using premium (controlled expansion) rifle hunting ammunition or premium self-defense handgun ammunition, it would be pretty unusual to see a 50% weight loss on impact even with a lead core bullet. Even with fairly simple bullet designs, handgun velocities are generally low enough that it's not common to see bullet weight losses of 50%.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
July 19, 2014, 04:46 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: North Mississippi
Posts: 854
|
I don't know about the 50% weight loss. The handgun tests I've seen on YouTube with lead ammo have never demonstrated 50% weight loss. They haven't even shown 10%. The last one I watched was a 158 gr. lead hollowpoint. It measured in the high 150's after being recovered. I'm not a "ballistics" guy, so I won't claim to know the why's and if's and becauses of it all, but I do know that those bullets didn't come out of the gel at 80 grains.
|
July 19, 2014, 09:37 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2006
Posts: 400
|
The pictures of recovered copped bullets often show the expanded petals, these have space between them and their edges look jagged and sharp. The things look like pretty good cutters and cutting through things can take less energy than crushing and pushing things aside so more energy left for penetration. No?
|
July 19, 2014, 10:33 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Mass divided by cross sectional area reflects penetration depth
Taking this to the limit "Assuming" the same mass, an AP round will penetrate further in gel because of the lesser / no deformation properties result in less cross sectional area slowing it down.
Copper will deform a little more, lead more than that (again all other things being equal) and a pressed nickel frangible much less, having the largest cross sectional area after entering the gel / target. In reality for, ballistics and properties of materials, nothing is linear or equal in real life.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|