May 2, 2014, 07:36 PM | #76 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 30, 2010
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 356
|
Yes, and so should magazine vs. clip. But after awhile, we stop trying to correct unless we can do it in a nice way and only if we offer other advice. Smiley faces can do wonders, BTW.
|
May 2, 2014, 08:03 PM | #77 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Let's leave the nits unpicked, okay?
|
May 2, 2014, 08:20 PM | #78 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
|
|
May 21, 2014, 08:24 PM | #79 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 13, 2014
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 2,187
|
Quote:
Why does everyone keep saying "7 mag" - there is no such chambering. But the answer to the question doesn't change - the .280 remington is the probably the best all-around north american big-game cartridge, followed closely by .30-'06 then closely again by .270 win. .280 is an improved .270 (better bullets) doesn't get any better for most uses. But .30-'06 is never a mistake. Don't get a .30 cal maggie - most people shoot them a few times, then sell them at a loss to get something lower recoiling and cheaper to feed -there's a reason for this phenomenon. In my view, if your game needs something bigger than .30-'06, a .300 maggie ain't gonna help. If you need range, a 7mm or .270 caliber round will get there with less drop and drift. If you need more bullet (very large game / body weight), it's time to step up to .338-'06, .35 Whelen, 9.3x62mm, .45-70 govt, or .375 HH mag. Don't get a Weatherby chambering - unless you have a enjoy spending unnecessary money and a sore shoulder. And .300 win mag? It's not a horrible round like some, but it's still an unneeded belted round. Last edited by Unlicensed Dremel; May 21, 2014 at 08:37 PM. |
|
May 21, 2014, 08:46 PM | #80 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
I'd probably use my 270 with 150 gr Partitions or Accubonds for elk. And I'm not shooting out past 300 yards on an elk, and I'm a good shot. IF the OP was a reloader, I'd say to go with the 300 Win Mag. One thing you can do with it is to load down to 30-06 levels if you want to. You can't load the 270 or 280 or 30-06 up to 300 WM levels.
The OP does need to consider recoil. That 300 WM with full power loads can hurt a bit. Lately I've been shooting my 223, 220, and 260, but decided to put a different scope on my late Father's Ruger Ultralight in 270. I shot maybe 10 rounds of full power loads and did have to say "Ouch". My Sako 270 is a good bit heavier and doesn't hurt to shoot. |
May 22, 2014, 10:21 AM | #81 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,605
|
Quote:
|
|
May 22, 2014, 02:14 PM | #82 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Location: Browns Summit NC
Posts: 2,589
|
If you just want to hunt successfully and are not in to trivial data crunching just get a 30-06 and be done with it.
|
May 22, 2014, 07:03 PM | #83 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2013
Posts: 161
|
The 30-06 seems to be a pretty good consensus...the .308 would probably be a good choice as well, but I think I am leaning towards a 30-06.
I appreciate all the help. Sorry I don't know all the correct lingo for rifles. |
May 22, 2014, 07:17 PM | #84 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
CC268, don't sweat it. Nobody was ever born an expert.
|
May 22, 2014, 09:08 PM | #85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,164
|
7 Rem Mag.
300 Win Mag. |
May 23, 2014, 10:20 AM | #86 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
There is nothing in this world that hasn't been killed with the '06.
Yup there are bigger, newer rounds out there, but I don't care how tough you are, the '06 (or my favorite the 270) works quite well and is easier to shoot. In hunting you spend more time carrying your rifle then shooting it. I like light rifles for that reason (I admit, I'm old and lazy). The easier the rifle is to shoot, the more you'll shoot it, the more you shoot it, the better shot you'll be. Of the rifles you listed I think you'll be happier with the '06 in the long run. As said I like the 270 Win but that wasn't on your list. I hunt elk with the 270 and it works great, so I have a hard time believing that the '06 with heavier bullets wont work. Ammo is available anywhere and its extremely easy to load for.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
May 23, 2014, 05:51 PM | #87 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2013
Posts: 161
|
Yea it seems like the '06 is a good way to go...and would still be just fine for target shooting and improving my shot. .308 would be fine too...kind of toss up but I am leaning towards the 30-06
|
May 23, 2014, 06:14 PM | #88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
OP, if I were buying a mid-range calibre hunting rifle all over again, I'd probably go .30-06 (I had reasons for choosing .303 British that don't apply to you). I came very close to buying a 6.5 Swede, but that's probably too close to the .243 you already have.
|
May 24, 2014, 03:21 AM | #89 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 10, 2010
Posts: 1,149
|
7mm Rem Mag is my favorite large game, long range round. It's a bit expensive for constant target practice though. Reloading is your friend in that situation.
__________________
Once Fired Brass, Top quality, Fast shipping, Best prices. http://300AacBrass.com/ -10% Coupon use code " badger " |
May 24, 2014, 03:59 AM | #90 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2013
Location: Payson Az
Posts: 169
|
+1 for the 7 mm rem mag. Flat shooter. Lots of knockdown.
|
May 24, 2014, 12:24 PM | #91 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
|
.270 win is so close to the 7mm rem mag, that it's not even worth the difference in the price of the ammo, IMO.
|
May 24, 2014, 01:54 PM | #92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2013
Posts: 161
|
I would prefer the 30-06 over the .270 just because of the wide range of factory ammo available.
|
May 25, 2014, 12:06 AM | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2013
Posts: 246
|
Go 300 Win Mag. Then you will have a 1 stop shop
|
May 25, 2014, 04:37 PM | #94 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2013
Posts: 161
|
I just think the 300WM would be tough for target shooting. It would be great hunting rifle, but I am not sure how pleasant it would be target shooting. If I got 9lb rifle and had a muzzle brake it wouldn't be bad at all, but I have to decide whether or not I would really want a muzzle brake.
|
May 26, 2014, 09:26 PM | #95 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,164
|
300 Win mag is very popular in 600 and 1k yard shooting.
|
May 26, 2014, 09:48 PM | #96 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Location: Browns Summit NC
Posts: 2,589
|
I have hunted with a 300 Win and a 300 WBY and they are OK if you can get perfect posture, don't need to make a left handed shot etc. But, they can dot your eye if you are out of position concentrating on making the shot that you have rather than setting up for heavy recoil. Shooting them off the bench is no big deal if you want to haul one with you.
|
May 26, 2014, 10:10 PM | #97 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2012
Location: Southern Appalachian Mtns
Posts: 1,520
|
If you got into handloading you could get the .300 win mag and load it down near .308 velocity if you wanted to, then crank it up to max loads for long range hunting. It would be kinda like having the .308 .30-06 and .300wm all in one. Reloading gives you so many options. It's very addictive.
__________________
DEO VINDICE |
May 26, 2014, 11:19 PM | #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2013
Posts: 161
|
I just don't know when I will have the cash for reloading equipment. Right now I have a lot of other hunting items to buy including a pack, optics, range finder, etc...all of which are pretty pricey.
|
June 1, 2014, 01:20 PM | #99 |
Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 33
|
I have a Savage 111 in .270 and it is a tack driver. I would not feel under-gunned with it hunting anything in the lower 48. The good thing about Savage rifles is they are affordable so you can put good optics on it. You can also buy barrels in other calibers that use the same action such as 30-06 if you want to for a couple hundred dollars and a few special tools.
|
June 1, 2014, 06:20 PM | #100 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 604
|
The only true flat shooter I have left in my quiver is an old Sako chambered in .243 caliber ! Most critters I hunt in MN can be taken with my 30-30 , 45-70 with light to moderate loads , and my favorite handguns in a new 10mm , .357 , or .44 caliber ! I bought a .338 Winchester magnum years back for the specific reason to hunt larger game with and I loved the rifle ( but sold it due to lack of need ) ! I used to shoot with an old pal of mine who had a Winchester model 70 chambered in .375 H&H magnum which his dad bought for Alaskan moose hunting and gave it to him ! The big magnums are actually a blast to shoot at least when I was younger but now would look for something a bit more manageable in a lighter built rifle ! As mentioned , light rifles are less of a burden in rugged country and something like the 30-06 or .270 has taken a lot of game ! More power to the folks that like the big magnums....I wish I had a good reason for one but I don't at this time !
Last edited by WIN1886; June 1, 2014 at 06:38 PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|