|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 25, 2011, 02:53 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: Weekend cowboy
Posts: 542
|
Revolvers that load through a channel - weakness?
Last night while downing a nice amount of Jack Daniels (alcohol always make you take things easy and think deeply about stuff you don't pay attention to when you're sober) and reading some past editions of Guns of the Old West Magazine, I notice that all revolvers which load through a port in their right recoil shield, including Kirst conversions of 1858 and Colt revolvers have their right recoil shields cut to perilously thin levels
The Colt SAA looks like a robust gun that belongs on the holster of an oilfield drill mechanic, but when viewed from the hammer and back grip, only a thin web of metal holds the top and bottom portions of the right recoil shield together. I wouldn't imagine that revolvers of that type, even Ruger single-actions to be safe when being constantly used with heavy-duty loads. (Even black-powder loads of the 1870s produce almost 1100 fps at the muzzle with a 200-255 grain bullet, which is pretty bad to the bone) I was going to channel the right recoil shield of my 1858 to accept the Kirst .45LC cylinder, but I think I am going to stick with the ungated cylinder so the gun can last through years of work and attain heirloom status (even though I am going to be using .45 Schofields for target and defense loads) Lets hear you all chime in about this. |
March 25, 2011, 02:59 PM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 9, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 260
|
I never heard of a frame failing in the area you mentioned.
|
March 25, 2011, 03:03 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: Weekend cowboy
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
Also, in the Spring 2009 edition of Guns of the Old West, (I believe), a writer states that Kirst specifically makes his .38 caliber cylinder to .38 LC specs and could not be used with .38 Specials, because open tops simply will not withstand the punishment from a regular .38 Special load. That is just a regular .38 Special, not a +P. |
|
March 25, 2011, 03:05 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Location: South Central, Iowa
Posts: 65
|
If you switch to a better quality of whiskey, I think you find that there really is no problem, of any kind, anywhere, any time.
__________________
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." —Norman Schwartzkopf |
March 25, 2011, 03:30 PM | #5 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 25, 2011, 03:35 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: Weekend cowboy
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
But blackpowder .45 Long Colts at full 1870s specs, still produce around 1000 feet per second while pushing a 200-255 grain bullet. That is still a lot of punch and will wreck the open tops, like what the author in the magazine said. Not sure about SAAs and 1858s though. |
|
March 25, 2011, 03:48 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
Impossible
There is no better Whiskey than Jack Daniels.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. |
March 25, 2011, 06:07 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Location: South Central, Iowa
Posts: 65
|
Swill! Makers Mark 4 me
__________________
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." —Norman Schwartzkopf |
March 25, 2011, 07:46 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
|
|
March 25, 2011, 09:42 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2009
Location: Blue Ridge Plateau
Posts: 151
|
J.D.
will do in a pinch, but I've grown rather fond of Trace lately.
Last edited by H.W. French; March 25, 2011 at 09:48 PM. |
March 25, 2011, 10:01 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Posts: 564
|
Quote:
|
|
March 26, 2011, 08:46 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced... SASS 47015 |
|
March 26, 2011, 09:02 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Actually, several manufacturers of "cowboy" ammo offer .38 colt ammo. Goex even offers it in a BP load.
|
March 26, 2011, 09:11 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Quote:
|
|
March 26, 2011, 01:31 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Depends on your definition of common. All the internet/mail order places sell them. Cabelas, Midway USA, Cheaper than dirt, Buffalo arms, Cimarron, they all sell .38 colt ammo. A lot of gun shops don't carry it, but I've been in several that don't carry .44 special either. It's not hard to find. Neither are the reloading dies, brass, or lead. Just depends on where you look.
|
March 26, 2011, 04:05 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
My definition of common is going to the local proprietor, maybe a couple of them. I for one have never bought ammo online. Heck you can get 38-55 at Wally World now. 40.00 bucks per box and 30-30 is 13.00 but you can get it.
|
March 26, 2011, 04:53 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Shoot, my local Wally doesn't hardly carry anything. Just the basic stuff. Not even .45 colt. I actually find better deals on ammo online, including shipping. My definition of common is how hard it is to get.
|
March 26, 2011, 05:13 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
I mostly roll my own but I do have a few calibers I never got around to reloading for. I almost bought a 38-55 a few months ago but I said I'd never find ammo for it and while I had the funding for the rifle I didn't have it for the brass and dies, etc. at the time and I do not like to let a new(to me)gun sit unfired more than 20 minutes after I get it home.
|
March 26, 2011, 05:28 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
|
|
March 27, 2011, 07:18 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2009
Posts: 1,624
|
Just another illustration of why guns and whiskey don't mix.
|
March 28, 2011, 09:53 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: Weekend cowboy
Posts: 542
|
OK guys you all have some interesting stuff, but I would like to know if there has been any frame failures in side-loading SAA type guns due to the recoil shield channel and if this feature weakens the frame in any way.
Interesting fat about the .38 Long Colt. Really interesting. I never played around with .36/.38s so I had no idea that these two were literally twins. |
March 28, 2011, 10:15 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
|
Rachen, I think that the general consensus is "no".
If you look at the direction and location of the force from the recoil, you'll see that it is back against the center part of the recoil shield. Now, the outer part of the recoil shield certainly adds some beef to the frame, but almost all of the force is exerted against the middle of the frame. I don't have any insight into the minds of Samuel Colt, et al, but it seems to me that the primary purpose of the "wings" of the recoil shield is to keep the loaded rounds from exiting the rear of the cylinder.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae |
March 28, 2011, 10:16 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
The only frame failures in a SAA that I have ever read/heard about were from over/under loaded hand loads. I saw pics, years ago of a 1st gen Colt SAA that was fired with an underloaded .45 round. Blew the cylinder apart, and the frame let go at the rear of the top strap at the top of the recoil sheild, not the loading channel. These failures were caused by bad ammo, not a weakness in the gun. I believe your fears are unfounded.
|
March 28, 2011, 11:16 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: Weekend cowboy
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
|
|
March 28, 2011, 12:03 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 24, 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 581
|
Regarding the 38 Colt v 38Spc. The 38 Colt uses a heeled bullet and the driving band is .375 which is correct for the barrel of the reproduction guns. The 38Spc bullet is .357 diameter and won't give any accuracy out of a .375 barrel unless you use hollow base wadcutters that will expand into the rifling or line the barrel to .357.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|