Full-Auto 1911 (Video)

oldbillthundercheif · June 19, 2007, 03:21 AM

This is the greatest thing I've ever seen. Is there more than one of these on the list o' registered MGs? If one of these ever goes on sale I'm buying it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXh3nRd1K8U

Mr Beta · June 19, 2007, 04:21 AM

That'd be fun 'til you ran out of ammo.

James K · June 19, 2007, 10:13 AM

I have not fired that particular gun, which appears to be a "one off" home build, but I have fired several selective fire pistols, 9mm, .45, and 7.63, with and without shoulder stocks.

But I have a problem. In spite of deep concentration and going into prayer and fasting, I have not been able to think of anything more useless. The stocked .45 pistol alone, without serious ear protection, is a sure path to deafness. An auto version will hit nothing with anything but the first shot except at bellygun range.

I'll pass.

P.S. A standard magazine lasts less than a second.

Jim

cuate · June 19, 2007, 11:51 AM

The F/A 1911 shown on the video with it's shoulder stock with the addition of a much longer barrel (available) and much larger capacity magazine would be an awesome ClassIII weapon, but........ If you have the many thousands of dollars to spend, an M3 .45cal. submachine gun is out there someplace, or the better 1928 F/A Thompson.

Whether we civilians under the Federal Firearms Act of 1934, need, desire, want, or whatever, the cost of obtaining them are prohibitive and the cost of not conforming to the law certainly is much more expensive in terms of dollars and prison.........

tomh1426 · June 19, 2007, 12:03 PM

IMO a single stack .45 and full auto dont make sence

oldbillthundercheif · June 19, 2007, 01:21 PM

Impractical? Yep.

Half crazy? You bet.

Insanely expensive? Probably.

I still want one.

FirstFreedom · June 19, 2007, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Non Standard M1911

That's one way of putting it. "That gat is jacked up!!" being the other way.

RevolverLover · June 19, 2007, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Impractical? Yep.

Half crazy? You bet.

Insanely expensive? Probably.

I still want one.
__________________

I wouldn't really say its half crazy or crazy at all....if you got the money and can find one then go for it.

You only live once

douglasschuckert · July 18, 2007, 02:10 AM

THAT IS A WICKED VID!!! I want one... I just may build one now (im a C2 SOT in FL)!!!! That would be completely useless, but sooooooo muuuuccccchhhhhh friggin FUUUUNNNNNN!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Imagine showing up at the range with that thing!! The attention would be awesome!! You'd be the envy of every gun nutt everywhere... Of course I will probably use a Kimber as a base.... Cant wait to get back state-side and back to my toys!!!

June 19, 2007, 03:21 AM	#1
oldbillthundercheif Junior member Join Date: April 21, 2006 Location: New Orleans Posts: 2,450	Full-Auto 1911 (Video) This is the greatest thing I've ever seen. Is there more than one of these on the list o' registered MGs? If one of these ever goes on sale I'm buying it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXh3nRd1K8U

June 19, 2007, 04:21 AM	#2
Mr Beta Senior Member Join Date: March 13, 2007 Location: San Antonio, Texas Posts: 232	That'd be fun 'til you ran out of ammo. __________________ The two loudest sounds in the world are a click when you expect a bang, and a bang when you expect a click.

June 19, 2007, 11:51 AM	#4
cuate Junior member Join Date: February 18, 2005 Location: Comanche Co. Texas Posts: 737	F/a 1911 The F/A 1911 shown on the video with it's shoulder stock with the addition of a much longer barrel (available) and much larger capacity magazine would be an awesome ClassIII weapon, but........ If you have the many thousands of dollars to spend, an M3 .45cal. submachine gun is out there someplace, or the better 1928 F/A Thompson. Whether we civilians under the Federal Firearms Act of 1934, need, desire, want, or whatever, the cost of obtaining them are prohibitive and the cost of not conforming to the law certainly is much more expensive in terms of dollars and prison.........

July 18, 2007, 02:10 AM	#9
douglasschuckert Senior Member Join Date: May 4, 2007 Location: Pensacola, Florida Posts: 141	FUll auto 1911... THAT IS A WICKED VID!!! I want one... I just may build one now (im a C2 SOT in FL)!!!! That would be completely useless, but sooooooo muuuuccccchhhhhh friggin FUUUUNNNNNN!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Imagine showing up at the range with that thing!! The attention would be awesome!! You'd be the envy of every gun nutt everywhere... Of course I will probably use a Kimber as a base.... Cant wait to get back state-side and back to my toys!!! __________________ Write your representative and say no to HR 1022!!! (Yet another $%$(&^-up law)! http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Fe...d.aspx?id=2668 - HR 1022 Assault Weapons Ban & Law Enforcement Protection Act (2007) http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/409898348 - Online Petition against! DO YOUR PART, WRITE YOUR DAMN REP, and DEMAND VETO!

June 19, 2007, 10:13 AM	#3
James K Member In Memoriam Join Date: March 17, 1999 Posts: 24,383	I have not fired that particular gun, which appears to be a "one off" home build, but I have fired several selective fire pistols, 9mm, .45, and 7.63, with and without shoulder stocks. But I have a problem. In spite of deep concentration and going into prayer and fasting, I have not been able to think of anything more useless. The stocked .45 pistol alone, without serious ear protection, is a sure path to deafness. An auto version will hit nothing with anything but the first shot except at bellygun range. I'll pass. P.S. A standard magazine lasts less than a second. Jim

June 19, 2007, 12:03 PM	#5
tomh1426 Senior Member Join Date: September 17, 2005 Location: Youngtown Arizona Posts: 1,135	IMO a single stack .45 and full auto dont make sence

June 19, 2007, 01:21 PM	#6
oldbillthundercheif Junior member Join Date: April 21, 2006 Location: New Orleans Posts: 2,450	Impractical? Yep. Half crazy? You bet. Insanely expensive? Probably. I still want one.