|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 16, 2010, 07:06 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Did Personal Protection TV endorse the .223 for home defense?
Don't know if anyone else caught the episode, but they showed pretty convincingly that that a 55gr. FMJ .223 round breaks apart before making it through 4 layers of wallboard, whereas both 9mm and .45 ACP rounds go through six without a problem, including one layer of external material that looked to be similar to stucco.
The implication was that the .223 "hits hard" but wouldn't endanger people in other rooms or outside the home as much as the heavier cartridges. I wish they would have tried 12 and 20 gauge shotguns as well, and also a .38 FBI load. |
February 16, 2010, 11:59 AM | #2 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Is that a different show than "The Best Defense"?
The Best Defense did a test, see here, but I was confused by the apparent difference between the commentary and the video.... It looked to me like the 223 blew a straight and increasingly large hole straight through all the walls. The commentary seemed to indicate that the penetration was LESS than the handgun rounds. I was confused.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley Last edited by Brian Pfleuger; February 16, 2010 at 12:05 PM. |
February 16, 2010, 01:23 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
It's definitely not the same test/program. The one I saw was on the Sportsmans Channel last evening at 6:30 Eastern. It's sponsored/directed by Hornady. The difference I saw was that the first wall was insulated. The results were similar, though, the .223 resulted in collateral damage being reduced/nil after two walls.
Thanks for the link. |
February 16, 2010, 04:24 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Just use the Federal 40 gr load !
|
February 16, 2010, 04:46 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 19, 2009
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 451
|
Is that the same episode where they cleared the home? They also showed loading the pistol buy pulling the slide back to load the first round instead of using the slide release.
__________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin Light is faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright unitl you hear them speak! They should have stopped with "Congress shall make no Law... |
February 17, 2010, 01:16 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: The shores of Lake Huron
Posts: 4,783
|
Quote:
__________________
Stevie-Ray Join the NRA/ILA I am the weapon; my gun is a tool. It's regrettable that with some people those descriptors are reversed. |
|
February 17, 2010, 05:31 PM | #7 | |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
While I am sure it is great for minimizing penetration concerns, you had better hope you have a nice, unobstructed frontal shot because otherwise that penetration is likely to be too shallow. There was a good discussion of this here (along with some good links on the subject): http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...d.php?t=333395 |
|
February 17, 2010, 06:16 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: The shores of Lake Huron
Posts: 4,783
|
Hmmm...maybe I'll stick to the Lake City M193 stuff.
__________________
Stevie-Ray Join the NRA/ILA I am the weapon; my gun is a tool. It's regrettable that with some people those descriptors are reversed. |
February 17, 2010, 06:32 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2008
Posts: 12
|
Check out The Box of Truth...
He tried ball, soft point and frangible ammo out of .223 thru 4 walls of
sheet rock. The ball and soft point penetrated all 4 walls. The frangible made it thru the first. See: http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot14.htm Simeon |
February 17, 2010, 08:24 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: February 7, 2010
Posts: 16
|
I would not use a 223 for home defense, when the revolution starts,,,maybe, but as a prowler stopper a 12 guage is the way to go.
I have one on each floor of the house, first round is bird shot, won't go through floors or walls for the most part if you pop off a hurried shot. Then i load the rest with 00 buck. If the bad guy is dumb enough to keep comming, that will rip him in half. |
February 17, 2010, 08:36 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 22, 2008
Posts: 416
|
If you are firing on someone, then you probably have a good reason. You are most likely not firing at someone retreating out the front door, but someone who is charging at you or about to fire upon you or is firing on you. Lets say you fired upon someone who is retreating out of the house then I believe the DA might have some questions to ask you.
Therefore, if you are firing on someone in close quarters who represents an immediate threat then you want the bullet with the best penetration possible. You are not going to miss with an M16 or M4 or other rifle at less then 25 yards. Even if you did miss, there is very little chance it will ever hit anyone else...at least statistically speaking. So if someone is about to fire on me or is firing on me I am not going to be so worried where my bullet goes and if there were gunshots I would expect for the general public to be diving and ducking. |
February 17, 2010, 09:26 PM | #12 | ||
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
Take a look at the long narrow "neck" for 55gr. Federal AE223 in the above picture to get an idea of what I am talking about. Now figure that the average human male is about 8"-9" deep from front to back. If you happen upon an unobstructed frontal shot, you are going to poke a 0.22" hole through most of the front and be well on your way to the back with the bullet exiting before it ever reaches its maximum cavity. In that same scenario - the 40gr Federal HP is going to be great. However, flip it around where you have someone pointing a handgun at you and an intervening arm or shoulder and now the Federal 40gr is going to not reach the vitals at all and the 55gr M193 is going to be right on target. That is the dilemma of terminal ballistics. However, you may also note that some of those rounds like the TRU223 64gr SP, 55gr LE223T1, and the 62gr LE223T3 would do well in either of those scenarios. Quote:
Last edited by Bartholomew Roberts; February 17, 2010 at 09:32 PM. |
||
February 18, 2010, 02:00 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: Out back Ky
Posts: 4,044
|
Quote:
__________________
Certified Armed Infidel Colt Defender ,Colt Mustang ,Dan Wesson CBOB, PPK/S, American Classic 1911,Bersa Thunder 380 http://bersachat.comHome of Bersa http://www.metroarms1911forum.com |
|
February 18, 2010, 02:25 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: February 7, 2010
Posts: 16
|
"Bird shot for birds If won't go thru dry wall"
_________________________________________________________________ It will go through drywall, i was making the point that if your first round is birdshot, and you have to get the shot off quickly and you miss, by the time it gets through the wall it hasn't got the enerygy to kill, not so with a 223. Not to many bad guys will stay around for shot number 2 and if you do hit with the first shot from a close enough range, it will most asuredly end the confrontation. And have you ever seen what a load of 00 buck does to a raccoon? I beg to differ. My only point with the use of a shotgun is the safety of your family comes first. How would you ever live with yourself if you were confronted in your home and your own shot caused a tragedy. Defending yourself and your loved ones INSIDE your home is a completly different story. |
February 18, 2010, 07:07 AM | #15 | ||
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...light=birdshot http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...light=birdshot http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...t+home+defense http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...t+home+defense All I can say is that birdshot/40gr .223/etc. is LETHAL force. It can kill or seriously injure and the only justification for using it is that someone presents an immediate threat of death or serious injury to you or someone else. I can't spesak for the rest of you; but in that situation I want to maximize the chances that I can end the confrontation quickly and with the minimal number of rounds. To that end, I want to tie up all the loose ends I can before such a confrontation. That means knowing what a particular round is likely to do with barrier penetration and using a round that will force the attacker to physically stop rather than rely on him changing his mind. |
||
February 18, 2010, 08:33 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,478
|
The "V" in Hornady's V-Max stands for varmint
They're called 'varmint' rounds and 'birdshot' for a reason. Does anybody here seriously think a six-foot-tall, 200+ pound drunk, tweaked on coke, meth, pcp, etc man is a varmint??
Save the lightweight 40gr Blitz, V-Max VARMINT rounds for groundhogs, squirrels and varmints. You're blowing this imaginary overpenetration issue way out of proportion. Those lightweight high-velocity bullets make nasty but shallow wounds. Personally, i'll stick with my W-W 64gr and 75gr OTM 5.56mm
__________________
member of an elite paramilitary organization: Eagle Scouts |
February 18, 2010, 02:45 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: The shores of Lake Huron
Posts: 4,783
|
Quote:
__________________
Stevie-Ray Join the NRA/ILA I am the weapon; my gun is a tool. It's regrettable that with some people those descriptors are reversed. |
|
February 18, 2010, 08:20 PM | #18 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
You're welcome. Some other good information on .223 self-defense ammo:
http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Roberts.pdf |
|
|