|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 27, 2005, 06:02 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 18, 2005
Posts: 3,298
|
Glazers...will they blow up by hitting the blue nose?
Glazers are rounds that penetrate into people and things and explode.
That being the case, will a glazer explode if I pull one out of my pocket and tapp the nose real hard against a table top? For that matter, will they go off if they are in my front pants pocket and I trip over and one of them hits the wrong way or something What causes them to blow up? I typically load glazers in my OP at night when I get home and then dump them in my pocket when I go out for the day reloading the gun with silvertip HP. |
October 27, 2005, 06:04 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2000
Location: California USA
Posts: 4,533
|
__________________
Regards, Ledbetter from thefiringline TFL #4573 NRA for Life Winchester Canyon Gun Club for Life |
October 27, 2005, 06:05 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Posts: 235
|
I may be totally off base, but are these the metal shaving filled rounds you are talking about? that are designed to deliver all their energy in a target and not overpenatrate anything else? or am I thinking of something else?
__________________
compassionate conservative (oh wait do they start wars and run up debt?) |
October 27, 2005, 06:13 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 270
|
Yeah, as far as I know, Glasers don't go boom. They have small shot inside of them to expands out the nose of the bullet when it hits target. They are designed not to penetrate too much and cause a large amount of damage. I use them in my apartment building for home defense and switch to hollow points when on the street.
|
October 27, 2005, 06:13 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 1, 2005
Location: Gilpin county, CO
Posts: 261
|
I really suspect that you're a troll, but...
Glazers don't actually explode. They merely break open, allowing the tiny lead shot inside to escape outwardly with all the momentum carried by the bullet itself.
Get yourself a tin can, fill it with lead shot, and cover the top of it with a piece of tightly stretched saranwrap. Hold the can like a football, and begin to throw it. Stop it quickly before it actually leaves your hand. If you did it hard enough, the shot should now explode outward through the saranwrap, covering your kitchen floor in lead spheres. Same idea as a glazer. |
October 27, 2005, 06:15 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 270
|
Nice analogy!
|
October 27, 2005, 06:28 PM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 21, 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,224
|
Is that spelling correct? I thought it was "Glaser." I may be wrong.
(Nope. Just looked it up. It's an S, not a Z. "Glaser Safety Slug.") There is nothing explosive about the blue tip. It's just the covering for the shot compartment. They are not explosive nor incendiary rounds. It's kind of a variation on frangible, if I'm not mistaken. Prefragmented, in the sense that there's "pieces" that will penetrate due to the round's energy and then disperse into/creating a wound channel. They're said to be pretty good. Haven't read or heard much of them lately. Anyone know if they were a flash in the pan, or if they see steady use and favor? -blackmind |
October 27, 2005, 06:59 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Posts: 235
|
they are still on the shelves of all the gun shops and ranges i go to. never used them myself. from what i have read their supposed to be effective. very good at putting all the energy on target, even safe for airplanes, supposedly.
__________________
compassionate conservative (oh wait do they start wars and run up debt?) |
October 27, 2005, 07:09 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 5,177
|
I see them at gun shows
usually covered in dust or yellowed with age. I think they were a great idea 20 years ago (I actually bought some way back when, shot some and still have some) but modern hollow points have passed them by (my opinion, worth exactly what you paid for it).
IMHO, MagSafes were an improvement on the Glaser design (larger shot size, better penetration but retaining the zero-ricochet) and I bought a bunch of them too. Come to think of it I have a number of unopened packages of them in my safe, 9mm and 40 cal. Want to buy? |
October 27, 2005, 08:38 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2000
Location: California USA
Posts: 4,533
|
I keep a loaded .45 in the house. It has seven hollowpoints in the mag and one Glaser in the chamber. If I have an ND, the first round won't go through the wall to my neighbors house. I'm hoping it will surprise the bad guy enough for me to get off the more effective rounds, if that they are, underneath.
The video demos on the Glaser web site are pretty convincing.
__________________
Regards, Ledbetter from thefiringline TFL #4573 NRA for Life Winchester Canyon Gun Club for Life |
October 27, 2005, 08:51 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2005
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 670
|
I heard someone say that one shot with a glaser safety slug was more likely to die of peritonitis than from trauma caused by the gunshot. They were a great idea in their time but the field has been crowded by more successful additions. Frangible ammo is now the "hot ticket" for Air Marshals, or so it is said.
As to carrying "exploding" ammo in the pants pockets, glasers aren't a problem as they don't explode. If you do happen to have some "exploders", put them in the rear pockets. That way an accident won't damage anything important (or at least as important as what might be damaged if they were in the front pocket(s))
__________________
My definition of Gun Control--- A steady grip and hitting your target. "In God we trust, all others are suspects." "If I shoot all the ammo I am carrying, either I won't need any more, or more won't be of any help". ____________________________________________ |
October 27, 2005, 09:26 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2000
Location: California USA
Posts: 4,533
|
According to this URL
http://mysite.elixirlabs.com/index.p...2665&page=1982 a .38+P Glaser made a permanent cavity in ballistic gelatin three times large than a .38 hollowpoint; it penetrated 1.5 inches less. There are photos and a boring guy narrating a video. I would NOT want to be in the way of one.
__________________
Regards, Ledbetter from thefiringline TFL #4573 NRA for Life Winchester Canyon Gun Club for Life |
October 27, 2005, 09:53 PM | #13 | |
Junior member
Join Date: July 21, 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,224
|
Quote:
It seems, to me, that it is almost planning for an ND. You even called it an "ND," meaning that you know it would be negligent. The answer to the threat from an ND is not to use a less penetrating round -- what if the round went through the doorway to the kitchen, not into a wall to be stopped. The answer to the threat from an ND is to make sure that your habits preclude you from having one. -blackmind |
|
October 27, 2005, 10:11 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Posts: 235
|
led: 1.5 inches is alot when you are talking penetration. the average torso is over 12 inches wide. all of your vitals are well protected. im not saying a shot to the chest is a picnic with these, but i will stick with what i know works.
__________________
compassionate conservative (oh wait do they start wars and run up debt?) |
October 27, 2005, 11:55 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2, 2005
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
|
|
October 28, 2005, 12:05 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2000
Location: California USA
Posts: 4,533
|
Blackmind, I congratulate you on your confidence that you will never have an ND.
__________________
Regards, Ledbetter from thefiringline TFL #4573 NRA for Life Winchester Canyon Gun Club for Life |
October 28, 2005, 12:09 AM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 21, 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,224
|
Note, I didn't say never.
But while I know that you meant that sarcastically, thanks anyway. I just know that I avoid doing foolish things pretty diligently, especially when it comes to firearms. And I just don't see how I could "mistakenly," say, pull the trigger on a gun, in my home, that I had not made sure to verify was unloaded. It's not smugness, it's well-justified confidence. I'm sure I'm not the only one around here who has it -- maybe just one of the few with the balls to assert it. -blackmind |
October 28, 2005, 01:20 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 401
|
blackmind, you better knock on wood...
What's it to you if Ledbetter feels safer with a Glaser in the chamber? He's not necessarily planning for an ND, any more than someone who carries a DA/SA decocked and safety on is planning to put themselves at a disadvantage. For some people, it's a peace of mind thing.
__________________
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how it remains so popular? |
October 28, 2005, 04:42 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 1999
Location: Occupied Virginia
Posts: 2,777
|
Frangible, is not explosive.
__________________
__________________ Μολών λαβέ! |
October 28, 2005, 06:14 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2002
Posts: 287
|
Glasers are interesting. I do not think that there is any round with a much misinformation about it with the possible exception of the Black Talon
1 Glasers are prefragmented the tiny piecy of shot are ( in the current version) compressed but are still seperate pieces of metal. Frangible ammo refers to a bullet that is made to break apart into dust size fragments upon hitting a hard material ( usually steel ). 2 Glasers are NOT used by airmarshalls, airmarshalls use JHP. Glasers will penetrate the wall/window of an airliner. That is not a real problem. A average size airliner has holes in the pressurized compartment of about a square foot in size. As far as pressure worst case scenario is windo goes air pressure goes down, masks pop out, plane descends no major problem unless you are infant sitting very close to window if the whole window goes. The real dange is hitting fuel/control lines/pilots. 3 The blue ( or silver, pellets used in silver are larger ) tip is a plastic ball to help in feeding the round in semiautomatics. ( though I have wonderd if it helped with dispersion of pellets. I do not know ). 4 Even a glaser blue will most likely ( building material varies widely ) go though 2-4 modern interior non load bearing walls. A .357 could go through 7-14 walls. All numbers are approximate. A lot of of older construction 1 could stop it but may not. 5 Effectiveness on human being is difficult to evaluate. I a NOT going there. Hope this helps NukemJim
__________________
"Half of being smart is knowing what you are dumb at" "Guns shoot bullets. People shoot people." |
October 28, 2005, 07:56 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 5, 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 881
|
I used to keep a full size USP .45 loaded with glasers. Never actually tried one on a watermelon or anything, but I really think any JHP ammo will do the job. People worry needlessly about overpenetration where good, modern ammo is concerned (and so long as you're not using a .223 or something for home defense).
Edit - that's assuming you HIT your target. |
October 28, 2005, 08:06 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
Quote:
pax |
|
October 28, 2005, 08:42 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2002
Location: Denton County Texas
Posts: 686
|
I found out recently that an old friend had his "home defense .45" loaded with 'em. But had never test fired to see if they cycled the slide - which in some semis they don't. (weight often ain't right).
Years ago, I ran some of the .223s thru a Mini-14. Too pricey for much testing, but what I shot "grouped" inconsistently - typically several inches low and right from 100 yard sight-in with normal 55 grainers. (I suspect sumthin to do with all those little pellets getting spun so quickly inside jacket ... So, yea, that's somewhat what causes them to "explode" upon impact.) At the time, I was testing for "richochet-resistant coyote load" for semi-urban environment. Hornady's newer "exploding" varmint loads found to be much less expensive - and far more accurate. |
October 28, 2005, 10:19 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 5, 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 881
|
Greybeard - that makes a lot of sense. It figures that the ballistics on these things (as far as bullet path) would be weird and inconsistent. It's meant for use at typical self-defense ranges, but I reiterate that glasers aren't really necessary. Any decent JHP will do a more than adequate job and my guess is that they would be far more reliable.
|
October 28, 2005, 12:35 PM | #25 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: Steubenville, OH
Posts: 4,446
|
I seem to recall that some years ago, I think it was the Indiana State Police, had a specially designed Glaser with a black tip made for them. Anybody remember those and what the difference was?
__________________
TFL Members are ambassadors to the world for firearm owners. What kind of ambassador does your post make you? I train in earnest, to do the things that I pray in earnest, I'll never have to do. --Capt. Charlie |
|
|