The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 21, 2008, 05:49 AM   #76
plom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 582
just my 2 cents, but in my career as LEO, I've seen 3 perps shot with shotguns,the last one was 2 weeks ago, he droped with a single shot at 8 yards.
All of them were shot with birdshots,usually by farmers using their old side by side, all of them were stoped and died at the scene.
Yes, at HOME DEFENSE RANGE, birdshots will stop a guy, and if you are forced to shoot a terminator that don't drop at the first shot, then try headshot, I don't think perps wear bullet proof eyes protection, blind BG is not so dangerous anymore...
__________________
DUX BELLORUM
plom is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 09:52 AM   #77
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Not necessarily true - in certain states, you are required to exit your home and leave it to the BG to ransack and steal rather than have a deadly force confrontation.
Cute but not true, even in NYC.
It was true in California when I was there a few years ago
oneounceload is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 01:29 PM   #78
nottelybill
Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Posts: 78
I have shot things other than turkeys with turkey loads. They will take our almost anything at close range.
nottelybill is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 04:54 PM   #79
nemoaz
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2007
Location: Meechigan
Posts: 492
Quote:
just my 2 cents, but in my career as LEO, I've seen 3 perps shot with shotguns,the last one was 2 weeks ago, he droped with a single shot at 8 yards.
Yeah, in my law enforcement and prior EMS experience I've seen some that dropped from birshot. I've also seen two with birdshot wounds to the head that walked about afterwards, although one was missing a jaw. Either could have killed someone had that been his intention.

Anecdotally, we've probably all seen or heard a little of everything. Dozens of people DRT (dead right there) from a .22. People who have taken 7 .45's to the chest and abdomen and walked away. 357 to the head that just skipped off the skull due to the angle. And I believe everyone of these stories and have seen photographs and reports of each. Crazy things can happen. That being said, the ballistic tests are pretty consistent on what it takes to be a reasonable manstopper. And a few inches of penetration in bare gelatin (even less with skin and clothes to penetrate) ISN"T it.

Personally, I wouldn't quibble much with largest birshot, #1, BB, or T shot that some of you have suggested. That's probably fairly close to adequate penetration at across the room ranges. I don't know why you'd limit yourself though. These turkey/goose/duck loads are more expensive than buckshot around here. I also like managed recoil/tactical loads (which are buckshot only AFAIK) because my wife has an easier time with it.

If I were forced to use smaller birdshot, I wouldn't trust it for a COM shot. I'd probably aim for the neck or head. I'd also expect to make multiple shots to stop the badguy.

Here's a pretty good evaluation of different loads: http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/ballistics_shotgun.html I know that many of you have seen this. I'm sure some haven't. Keep in mind that bare gelatin equals more or less bare flesh. I've you've ever tried to puncture the skin or a person or animal, you know that the skin itself is more resistant to penetration than the flesh underneath. Also, most criminals will be wearing clothing. In my neck of the upper midwest, they were a lot of clothing this time of year.

There is a reason why no law enforcement agency carries birdshot. PLOM, what do you carry in your duty shotgun? Hmmmm...

My last post. I don't really have anything to add. Not really sure I added anything from any of the other weekly birdshot vs. buckshot posts.

Last edited by nemoaz; November 21, 2008 at 05:37 PM.
nemoaz is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 05:27 PM   #80
plom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 582
duty shotgun is loaded with low recoil 12 pellets buckshot from fiocchi
__________________
DUX BELLORUM
plom is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 05:54 PM   #81
Scattergun Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 29, 2008
Location: Nine Mile Falls, Washington
Posts: 1,186
Why Limit yourself

No one will know what the next gunfight will look like, or what it will take to win! Clint Smith

Why Limit yourself by ammo selection? There are more than enough limiting factors using scatterguns as fighting weapons.

I load my scattergun with 000 or 00 indoors and have some slugs handy if it goes outside.

Good Luck & Be Safe
__________________
First, with the most, WINS!
Regards, Scattergun Bob
Scattergun Bob is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 06:19 PM   #82
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
Depends on the application, I load one of my HD shotties with birdshot. Then again, it's 3.5" Steel BB shot from a 10ga. The 12ga gets loaded with 3" #4 Buckshot.
Webleymkv is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 07:12 PM   #83
nate45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Why Limit yourself by ammo selection?
In the past I loaded my defense shotgun with #2 bird shot, I did it for years, because I thought they would be adequate.



I just figured no one could stand up to one of those, all I was doing though was guessing and not taking into consideration the fact that if I ever did have to shoot someone it probably wouldn't be a normal person.

More than likely the vast majority of people would be stopped by having a shotgun pointed at them, more than likely the vast majority of people that didn't stop would be if hit by a load of #2 bird shot.

What we have to ask ourselves though is what kind of a person breaks into an occupied dwelling? A normal person? A run of the mill thief who thought no one was home? Possibly, but given the modern day rash of home invasions and bizarre crimes why take a chance?

Look, it is actually very rare for anyone to have to point a firearm at someone, its rarer still to have to shoot, but if someone forcibly breaks into your home in the middle of the night while you are at home, do you really want to be armed with birdshot?

Some people have said well its just the first shot or two, then I've got buck or slugs. What if one or two shots are all you get? Why take a chance? If you actually had to go to the extreme lengths of shooting an intruder, what would be the bigger worry? The remote lightening strike odds of an over penetrating pellet hurting an innocent, are of birdshot, given all we now know of its shortcomings, failing to stop a determined possibly drugged or psychotic assailant?

If we were going to choose a new defense round for our favorite .45 or 9 mm would we pick one that tests showed didn't penetrate deep enough to reach the vitals? If we were going to pick a new deer hunting load would we pick one that failed a penetration test? So why would we pick a defense shotgun load that constantly fails penetration tests? Why?

I'll ask again if someone out there has test showing birdshot delivering adequate penetration lets see them.

Lets see some proof that bird shot is suitable for defense besides wishful thinking and stories of people being killed by it. I can tell relate stories of people being killed by pellet guns, but that doesn't make them proper defense tools.







100_0715.JPG
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."- Thomas Jefferson
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
(>_<)
nate45 is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 07:34 PM   #84
Homerboy
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,320
Birdhshot MIGHT drop a guy dead, but buckshot and slugs WILL, and IF the guy dies 30 seconds after I shoot him with birdshot, how many shots can he fire back at me in that meantime?

If you're trying to save your life and the lives of your wife and children, I would NOT rely on birdshot. Sorry, but my life is worth more then the POSSIBILITY of shooting through a wall. If I lived in an aprtment (and I used to), I would not opt for a shotgun if I was afraid my buckshot would penetrate a wall. I would get a .38 with Glaser ammo and call it a night.
Homerboy is offline  
Old November 21, 2008, 08:56 PM   #85
GreyOne
Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 19
I have seen a few SG shooting with birdshot. One was a suicide who put it in his mouth and created a V shaped trough- he was DRT. Another was shot in the abdomen at about 3 feet through a screen door. His intestines were a mess and he ended up with a colostomy bag. About a year later I heard he decided to eat a .45 because the pain was too much.
Bottom line, an attacker may be wearing a heavy wool or leather coat, and that will reduce penetration a good bit, especially with bird shot. If you ever face an attacker who is high on drugs, you will find not much effect from your "rack" sound (I am really tired of that foolish meme) and you may find he does not notice the pain and bleeding of a shallow bird shot wound. Use buck shot if you plan to defend your family- go with bird seed er shot if only your own sorry tail is at risk.
GreyOne is offline  
Old November 22, 2008, 12:28 AM   #86
Ricky B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2002
Posts: 251
Quote:
It was true in California when I was there a few years ago
Sorry, but you were misinformed by someone. It is not true now, it wasn't true then, and it has never been true in CA.

Here is the text of Penal Code §198.5:

Quote:
Any person using force intended or likely to cause death or
great bodily injury within his or her residence shall be presumed to
have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death
or great
bodily injury to self, family, or a member of the household when that
force is used against another person, not a member of the family or
household, who unlawfully and forcibly enters or has unlawfully and
forcibly entered the residence and the person using the force knew or
had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry occurred.
None of that looks like a rule that "you are required to exit your home and leave it to the BG to ransack and steal rather than have a deadly force confrontation."
Ricky B is offline  
Old November 22, 2008, 06:37 PM   #87
Katrina Guy
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2006
Posts: 315
Bird shot for home defense?

SOMEone's seen Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds" recently huh.
Katrina Guy is offline  
Old November 22, 2008, 10:18 PM   #88
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
Rick - thanks for the correction
oneounceload is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 02:53 AM   #89
Ricky B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2002
Posts: 251
You're welcome. And in this vein, here's an item from News of the Weird:

Quote:
In October, the local government council in Worcester, England, ordered Bill Malcolm to take down the 3-foot-high, barbed-wire fence he had installed to deter the thieves who had broken into his storage shed three times in the previous four months. According to the Daily Mail, the council said it feared the government would be sued by a wounded trespasser. [Daily Mail (London), 10-8-08]
Ricky B is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 08:45 AM   #90
alloy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
Pit Bull ammo...gimmick or viable as a choice?

http://www.ammunitiontogo.com/catalo...pecialtyexotic
__________________
Quote:
The uncomfortable question common to all who have had revolutionary changes imposed on them: are we now to accept what was done to us just because it was done?
Angelo Codevilla
alloy is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 12:42 PM   #91
Jay1958
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 274
There are lots of choices for those concerned about over-penetration, without resorting to birdshot.

Low-recoil buckshot has the dual advantage of reduced penetration (due to lower muzzle velocity) and lower recoil to make followup shots easier.

Also, 00 buck is not the only buckshot available. 1 Buck and 4 buck both use smaller pellets and have lower penetration of walls, etc. If you are still worried about it, go with BB loads. Smaller than buckshot, but bigger than "birdshot".

Check out this link for comparative sizes:

http://www.ammobank.com/shotsize.html

Personally, I use #1 and #4 buckshot for SD purposes, but that's just me. I don't have any children in my home, and my wife and I sleep in the same room.
Jay1958 is offline  
Old November 23, 2008, 01:19 PM   #92
Ricky B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2002
Posts: 251
Pit Bull ammo

Interesting combo, six 00 buck pellets and a 3/4 oz. slug. Being able to fit a 3/4 oz. slug in with six pellets into a 2-3/4" shell makes me wonder if the slug is simply a flat lead disk, which is probably accurate enough at near-contact distances but may veer unpredictably at, say, 30 feet.

All that the site's listing says about velocity of this ammunition is "loaded to the max load." So one question is whether the velocity is adequate, and assuming it is, this thing must kick like the devil.

Before relying on such a load, it would be wise to test it thoroughly, but at its price (plus my guess at what the shipping would cost), it's going to cost in the neighborhood of $4 per round. That makes testing a bit expensive but not out of the question.

I think, however, that a 3" shell with 12 00 pellets will solve whatever problem this product is marketed to solve (and might even kick less).

Last edited by Ricky B; November 23, 2008 at 01:34 PM.
Ricky B is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05598 seconds with 9 queries