May 9, 2012, 05:18 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 416
|
Paramilitary Training??
Caught this in the news. Some White Supremacist idiots were arrested in Florida. What stood out to me was one of the charges filed against them, "Paramilitary Training". Not sure what the specifics are on that charge/law, but how far of a stretch would it be for that to include "Tactical Training"??
Just something to ponder!! |
May 9, 2012, 05:27 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 2,016
|
http://www.times-standard.com/staten...onspiracy-case
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member USN Retired |
|
May 9, 2012, 07:46 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 416
|
Florida law
Skadoosh: Thanks for clarifying the law. I have no problem in the individuals being arrested for their crimes, I just thought tcharge listing, "Paramilitary Training" brought up an interesting situation where one could include tactical training into it.
I have met some individuals who think and see any type of "Tactical Training", such as a tactical carbine/shotgun courses as paramilitary type training!! With todays liberal views and political correctness I could see this happen. Maybe Claire Wolfe might chime in with her thoughts!! |
May 9, 2012, 08:42 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
The larger question is if going out on the mesa and unloading a bunch of Wally World ammo is enough for Homeland or some other agency to "send in the scoops? Do you have to shoot in a formally regulated environment? Is it the wearing of the camo? Black rifles? Three or more shooters? Doing push-ups?
What makes it paramilitary? What is the trip wire for the offense. When does it stop being plinking, and become a crime? |
May 9, 2012, 09:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Skadoosh nailed it earlier. The full text of the relevant law is here, but the important parts are that for the training to be unlawful, the person conducting it must fall under the "knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder within the United States" wording of the law.
Also, further down in the law, it explicitly says that "training or teaching of the use of weapons to be used for hunting, recreation, competition, self-defense or the protection of one’s person or property, or other lawful use" is strictly NOT prohibited by the law. |
May 9, 2012, 09:39 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 2,016
|
I think the point here is that taking a snippet from a larger context causes undue anxiety where there should be none...
__________________
NRA Life Member USN Retired |
May 9, 2012, 10:17 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 416
|
Clarification
ScottRiqui: Thank you for the site which states the law.
|
May 9, 2012, 12:16 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
Confusing.
What I found most confusing was the FBI connection, and Florida laws. There
doesn't seem to be any federal charges. Is this policy for the FBI with their apparent manpower shortage to investigate state law infractions? |
May 9, 2012, 04:40 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
To avoid "double jeapordy" Feds will usually defer prosecution to a local jurisdiction in order to have a fall back case if things go poorly at a State trial. The other way is that they'll let the jusidiction with "the most teeth" take the first bite.
That's how the Army convicted a retiree a few years back of murder after North Carolina failed to convict. No double jeapordy because of two different jurisdictions. Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
May 9, 2012, 05:56 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
Thanks for the clarification!
It looks like you really must have some kind of history to be affected. These
guys were originally a California problem that migrated east. I guess if you act like a jerk long enough, eventually it catches up to you. Facial tats really are some kind of self identifier or what? |
May 9, 2012, 06:34 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2010
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,293
|
I will reserve judgment until trial...I can see it now
"Yeah Mr. Skinhead, i'm a skinhead too and I hate Obama. Can you teach me how to shoot?" "Sure I can" "Freeze , FBI Agent!" Seen it too many times where the government "upfront" seems to have a good case but they end up pleading the guys out on much less severe charges because the case is BS. On a curious note, I wonder how many Occupy types fall under this law. After reading the Florida Law excerpt I imagine you could use it as a catch all to arrest all sorts of Occupy types for teaching others to make a device that can be "capable of causing injury". |
May 10, 2012, 07:18 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 761
|
I can only imagine Jethro and Cletus running around in XXXL BDU pants, Ted Nugent T-shirt, trucker hat and old-school LBE, doing "tactical" maneuvers. Like the wannabes I see at my range rolling around on the ground like a beached whale trying to engage 100-meter targets like they see on TV.
I don't know whether to laugh of call the Marine Mammal rescue line.....
__________________
"Our contract called for 16 cases of rifles and ammunition for $10,000 dollars, not a machine gun...........That is our present to the General"-Pike Bishop “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” |
May 10, 2012, 07:54 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2004
Location: Plain Ol', TX
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
__________________
-A conclusion is not a destination, it's simply a convenient place to stop thinking.- -Reading a thing doesn't automatically make it so; repeating it doesn't necessarily make it any truer.- -Every Texan should be a member of the Texas State Rifle Association. |
|
May 10, 2012, 08:46 PM | #14 | |||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
Quote:
IMHO, the issue isn't the paramilitary-ness of "tactical" training (since "tactical" usually isn't well-defined by the places that purport to offer it, either), but the intent behind the training. Those state laws I've seen generally paralleled Florida's, which means the arrest isn't because of participating in paramilitary training, but doing so with the intention of causing civil unrest. In other words -- training to be a terrorist. So the real concern is how broadly that might be construed, and what level of proof a jurisdiction must produce to support a charge that "paramilitary" training is for the purpose of creating civil unrest. |
|||
October 5, 2012, 01:50 AM | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2012
Posts: 2
|
Were these people really arrested because of this??? I did not see ANYTHING in this video that shows they were planning acts of violence. Even the informant was asking if certain things were legal, most likely because he knew they were opposed to doing anything illegal. Are we NOT in America? Do we NOT have freedom of speech? Weather that includes a demonstration or speaking our minds, it is within our rights as Americans.
The 1st Amendment: FREEDOM OF SPEECH. The 2nd Amendment: THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS So why are these people really being arrested? Weather you agree with their political views or not you cant deny they are within their rights as Americans and nothing here proves otherwise! Watch the videos, make your own conclusions! http://www.wftv.com/videos/news/raw-...graphic/vd5St/ |
October 5, 2012, 07:35 AM | #16 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Likewise, the 2nd Amendment is still subject to quite a bit of regulation. Quote:
We're not on the jury, and we haven't seen the indictment, so we don't have all the facts. However, prosecutors don't usually bring a case unless they've got some evidence.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
October 5, 2012, 07:46 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: East Texas
Posts: 407
|
The intent, knowing or having reason to know is a big qualification.
If someone who had been an infantryman wanted to take a couple of gun buddies out and show them how to assault a bunker using a big cardboard box a baseball and their favorite long guns it wouldn't be a crime unless they were planning on assaulting the post office or something. If, as is much more likely, the guy was just showing off or trying to give them a feel for how the Army or Marine Corps trains, it wouldn't be a problem. Unless one of them had a heart attack while doing three to five second rushes. |
October 5, 2012, 01:03 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Posts: 550
|
__________________
In my hour of darkness In my time of need Oh Lord grant me vision Oh Lord grant me speed - Gram Parsons |
October 5, 2012, 01:20 PM | #19 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
Should make for interesting cases in court ... |
|
October 5, 2012, 02:21 PM | #20 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
An element of many crimes is intent. Prosecutors often are able to prove intent to the satisfaction of a jury.
In this case, we probably don't have all the information, but it's quite possible that the training included literature or documentation from which an intent to "further a civil disorder" could be inferred.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
October 5, 2012, 03:36 PM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 10, 2009
Posts: 974
|
a 500 round brick of bulk 22 lr is considered a "well supplied arsenal".
just owning a pressure canner, or canning jars, makes you a "survivalist". heck, just knowing not to use certain leaves as toilet paper in the forest makes you a 'survivalist". |
October 5, 2012, 05:51 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2012
Posts: 2
|
Obviously no one here knows the facts or what other evidence there might be. The point however, was, the public "evidence" like the undercover videos taken by the informant, in my opinion do not show "paramilitary training"
I also highly doubt that a handful of people were planning to shoot up a government building in hopes to start a race war. What I've seen so far is a group of people shooting on their land like many of us do. The only difference here is these people have views that many dont agree with. Also keep in mind when there is an informant involved there are lies. These informants need to make a case so they can make good on their deals to lessen their own sentences. |
October 5, 2012, 06:40 PM | #23 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
October 5, 2012, 07:00 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
Frank, you are absolutely correct. That is why I keep telling people to stop issuing conclusions about the Martin case. We just don't know all the facts and the evidence.
__________________
Jim Page Cogito, ergo armatum sum |
October 5, 2012, 08:20 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
One should read http://www.amazon.com/Lone-Wolf-Terr.../dp/0826518559
There are documented cases of individuals or small groups who do plan small attacks for religious, racial, ecoterrorist, left wing, right wing or messages from Mars reasons.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|