September 29, 2012, 09:35 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Posts: 132
|
Pinned Barrels on S&W
Was looking at model 60-3 chief specials 38 5 shot on line some have pined barrels some don't what is the difference? Seems like the ones with out the pin cost more. Is one better than the other? Is it a new safety issue for + P? I like the ones with out the pin.
|
September 29, 2012, 09:43 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
For many years, S&W fitted their barrels rather loosely and kept them from unscrewing by using a cross pin. As you note, that was costly and they were the only revolver company to do that. But in recent years, S&W has gone to the simpler method of torquing the barrel shoulder against the frame. Yes, it is a cost cutting measure, and like other such measures has a lot of folks ranting about TEOTWAWKI since S&W quality has gone to heck in a handbasket.
But a company that can't or won't come up with innovative ideas to keep costs down will soon be remembered by another word - bankrupt. Jim |
September 29, 2012, 09:48 PM | #3 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Neither approach is better; the company simply moved towards a more efficient approach. The same goes for not counterboring chambers any more--it wasn't necessary, and it just added to the cost. There really isn't any difference in function, accuracy, or durability.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
September 29, 2012, 09:56 PM | #4 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Well, no. The barrels were not a crush fit and once the pin was driven out, the barrel was put in the barrel vise and a hammer handle or a piece of 2x2 through the cylinder window used to turn the frame off the barrel. Trying that with a new S&W will result in a badly bent frame.
I agree there is no practical difference. Jim |
September 29, 2012, 10:01 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Posts: 132
|
Dose the pin date the gun?
|
September 29, 2012, 10:24 PM | #6 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
I could be wrong; I've heard it both ways. Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
September 29, 2012, 11:59 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Savannah TN
Posts: 1,220
|
Actually, the pin does more of less date when it was made. They stopped pinning barrels and counterboring the cylinders sometime around 1982.
Whether they are better without the pinned barrels or not, the fact is that the pinned barrel models are more desirable than the unpinned variety. Those looking to collect S&W revolvers will generally pay a premium for the earlier guns over their later cousins. That's why the prices were higher for the earlier guns. The same can be said for the S&W's with no MIM parts or the internal locks. There is a perception that the revolvers that were made before those features were introduced are better made and there are people out there that won't own the latest production models. I personally see no real functional difference between the early vs the later guns. I do however, collect pinned barrel Smiths and prefer the 5 screw models. |
September 30, 2012, 05:32 AM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
The difference is in the amount of torque used to tighten the barrel down, Tom.
The older guns didn't use nearly as much torque. Jim is correct that you can often remove the barrels on the older guns with very little pressure. The major problem with the new style is that there is no absolute reference to indicate when the barrel is screwed on straight. For years after dropping the cross pin S&W had problems getting the barrel screwed on so that the front sight was vertical. When I was working for the gun shop in the early 1990s we sent quite a few back to the factory that had front sight cants of 10 degrees, or worse.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 30, 2012, 05:36 AM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
"Dose the pin date the gun?"
Yes, it does. S&W dropped the pins (and the recessed chambers on the centerfire magnum revolvers) around 1983. In some models it happened earlier, in others later. Some revolvers also show one feature and not the other. They're called, roughly, transitional models.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 30, 2012, 06:38 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Posts: 132
|
How about + P in the S&W model 60-3 SS chief special 38?
|
September 30, 2012, 08:08 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Savannah TN
Posts: 1,220
|
The SCSW does not mention a +P rated Model 60 until the guns made from 1993 on. However, if someone has a copy of the literature that came with an earlier gun, it will mention as whether the heavier loading can be used.
|
September 30, 2012, 09:13 AM | #12 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
September 30, 2012, 09:45 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
Most guns with pins are likely to be of better quality than those without the pin. Not because of the pin but because of cost cutting in other areas leading to poor quality on some guns.
|
September 30, 2012, 10:07 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
My 19-3 pinned & recessed is a work of art.
My 1995ish 640 just works...both are fine guns without locks. I see no reason to buy new ones when the old ones are better and cheaper. Maybe S&W should try listening to their customers. They have a good thing going. Maybe they could shrink the number of models and increase quality and volume to be more profitable?? |
September 30, 2012, 11:07 AM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
|
One thing I have noticed regarding pinned/non pinned S&Ws is that most of the non pinned crush fit barrels have a slight constriction where the frame's threads surround the barrel shank. Most of my S&Ws are P&R models but I have a couple of newer ones (post 94) and you can clearly see the constriction where the frame "crushed" the barrel. It does not seem to be enough of a problem to affect the bullet's engagement with the rifling after squeezing through the tight spot but I feel the old method was better. The old P&R Smiths were assembled with greater care than the current ones and the fit and finishing is better and you almost never got an old one with a trigger pull that really needed any further "enhancement".
|
September 30, 2012, 07:37 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2005
Location: North Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 4,767
|
Quote:
I like the pinned barrels better, but I won't turn my nose up at a nice unpinned one.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 (NKJV) |
|
September 30, 2012, 09:09 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2012
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 2,989
|
I might add the current method of fitting barrels is adequate so long as its the original barrel installation. I had a Model 29 fitted at the factory with a 5" full lug barrel, a factory retrofit. After a few thousand rounds being fired, by barrel canted slightly until I ran out of windage adjustment in the rear sight. So, took the gun to my gunsmith and had him realign the barrel and dirll and pin it. Problem solved.
Bob Wright |
October 1, 2012, 04:13 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 234
|
Lotta misinfo here.
On the older model S&Ws the one piece barrels were threaded into the frame - the cylinder gap was checked and the fixed sights were checked to make sure they weren't canted. Then the barrel was pinned to make sure it didn't move. This was before CNC milling machines were common and handfitting of parts was still the norm. The pin disappeared when they went to more efficient methods. |
October 1, 2012, 08:37 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: December 28, 2008
Posts: 18
|
Also, IIRC, only the magnum and rimfire calibers had recessed chambers. For example, my model 25-5 is pinned but not recessed. I think 22s are still recessed to prevent damage to the face of the cylinder from firing pin strikes, while on magnums the reason was in the event of case head blowouts which was really not needed.
|
October 1, 2012, 09:17 AM | #20 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
|
CNC machines may be more efficient but they're not necessarily better unless production quotas are more important than quality fitting.
|
October 1, 2012, 09:27 AM | #21 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
I may be mistaken about this, but I'm pretty sure that S&W stopped pinning the barrels BEFORE CNC machinery was rolled out to the company.
It was done, so I'm told, to make sure that their production techniques would accommodate dropping the pin. For a number of years, given just how many guns came from the factory with misaligned barrels, I'd have to say that their automated processes took a long time for them to figure out. We were still seeing more than an inconsequential number of guns with canted barrels up through 1997 or so. It wasn't uncommon for us to have to send 1 in 20 to 1 in 30 revolvers back to the supplier.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
October 1, 2012, 10:25 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2008
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
|
|
October 1, 2012, 12:09 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Not close enough to the beach
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
|
|
October 1, 2012, 12:30 PM | #24 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
October 1, 2012, 02:58 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
It's all about cost cutting. I've only owned one that I finally had to get rid of, no good and no luck with S&W service. it was a Bangor Punta model 24. No pin. I finally traded it in on a Colt. I have 5 later model guns, took me 10 years to buy another new one tho. I would rather have a used gun with a pin. The 5 newer guns all would function and are accurate, sent 2 back to factory( one is still not right but it's no longer out of time) , I'm using one as is. Another I bought used and it's really a good shooter. Number 5 went to the local S&W repair center, they scratched it for me.
I guess we should be glad S&W still makes revolvers, I just can't love a Ruger D/A Revolver, Colt quit. |
|
|