December 29, 2012, 12:12 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2012
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 223
|
Odd ball Enfield
I just bought this odd ball Lee Enfield No4 Mk1 ROF(F) 17.25" barrel.
Anyone have any ideas about it. |
December 29, 2012, 06:24 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2006
Location: West virginia
Posts: 653
|
Cant really tell but could this have been a jungle carbine at one point? Someone may have cut it down at one point also.
__________________
Kill em all and let God sort em out! USAF |
December 29, 2012, 06:43 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2012
Posts: 397
|
While this is almost certainly a homemade "Bulldog" type cut down no.4, I have seen images of a relic No.4 barreled action dug up on a WW2 European battle field that had been shortened in the same manner and a Grenade launching tube afixed to the muzzle.
Speculation at the time was that rifle had been a one off modification for a special purpose, perhaps as a compact anti-tank grenade launcher, or for use in launching heavy smoke grenades to mark a LZ. British Paratroopers had been engaged in battle on that spot, but little other information was available. If the cut end of the fore end and handguard show raw wood its most likely a very recent modification. If the cut ends show significant aging then theres a slim possibility that the alteration may have been done while the rifle was in service. Cutdown rifles are a fairly common concealable self defense weapon in a number of third world countries. Among confiscated weapons in Pakistan and Afghanistan were many cut down 11mm Mausers and other shortened rifles. I've seen images of many home Bubba'ed cutdown No.4 rifles over the years, and at one time a similar but longer barreled "Bulldog" was offered for sale by importers. There had been several types of prototype Bulldog conversions of the No.4 while the No.5 carbine was in development stages, but so far as I can tell these are all in museum collections. Similar very short Bulldog conversions of the M1917 rifle are among the more oddball exhibits at the Springfield Armory museum. There used to be a photo collection of these exhibits online, but that site went down many moons ago. |
December 29, 2012, 01:00 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Thanks for sharing, cool gun regardless of its pedigree and or authenticy.
|
December 29, 2012, 05:24 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
I know little about enfields and I could be completely wrong here but with the solid bolt handle(knobs not hollowed out) the bolt is from a number 4 rather than number 5 jungle carbine. also, the number 5's handguards were not long enough for that one to belong so it is also more than likely from an number 4. add to that the front stock band and front sights are from the number 4 and it has L style rear sights(american made MK1*), this is definitely not a number 5, unless someone took a great deal of time to strip a number 5 receiver and replace all the parts with various number 4s which would be a huge hassle with almost nothing to gain.
however the brass ring on the stock is something that I've only seen on older designs like the RIC carbines and and number 1 rifles. I would wager that this is just a parts rifle, assembled from a huge stack of parts and cut down since there is little collectors value in it. I however love my enfield and would love to build myself a great little brush gun like this one. it probably kicks like a freaking mule but I bet it sure is fun. be sure to post a range review on this little bad boy.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
December 29, 2012, 05:47 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2008
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,347
|
Tahuna nailed it. It is definitely a number 4, or at least it is now. Should be interesting to shoot...
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ VIGILIA PRETIUM LIBERTATIS "The price of liberty is vigilance" America is at an awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. |
December 29, 2012, 06:35 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2012
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 223
|
Odd ball
Haven't shot this one yet, I think it will be loud and with a pretty good fireball. I like it Kind of a "(British)Bulldog". The receiver is marked No4 Mk1 ROF(F) which I think means it was made in Liverpool at Royal Ordnance Factory (Fazakerley).
Not a Jungle Carbine, some one said it may have been modded by "Century Arms". |
December 29, 2012, 06:45 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2011
Posts: 133
|
Gasmandave - you are correct mate, ROF (F) indicates made at ROF Fazakerley. National munitions plant, north end of my home town, Liverpool.
To pronounce like a native, keep emphasis even and hack the 'k' like a Dutchman choking on a 'g', or Daffy Duck being throttled. Cracking, interesting little rifle you have. |
December 29, 2012, 07:07 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2012
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 223
|
Been debating putting a scope on it...my eyes are not what they used to be
|
December 29, 2012, 07:17 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2012
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
I have seen a SMLE MkI buttstock (the early type of English Walnut with extra lightening tunnels drilled under the butt plate) fitted to a no.4, how it got there is unknown. The butts aren't entirely interchangable, but are easily fitted to the other type action bodies. Some butts made specifically to be used with either type rifle without alteration were manufactured during WW2. While throat erosion is the most common damage to Enfield bores due to hard use, damage to the crown and rifling within several inches of the muzzle is nearly as common, and due entirely to improper cleaning practices. It was said that a recruit who did not know how to handle the pull through could do more damage to the bore in five minutes than decades of service with tens of thousands of rounds fired. I've run across more than a few otherwise very nice bores with the crown worn into a lop sided oval and little or no rifling for the last six inches. This comes from dragging a grit laden pull through out the muzzle without making sure to pull the cord straight out. The occasional use of jointed steel cleaning rods by third world users does even more damage. Then only a inch or so of the rifling at the muzzle is damaged counter boring can save the barrel, if damage extends further back cutting the barrel back is often the only way to obtain useful accuracy. Fore ends damaged in bayonet practice are fairly common, and one may find one dirt cheap in a smith's parts bin. If one wishes to build a snub nosed Tanker or Bulldog as a knockaround beater they should start with a pre-disastered barrel and a fore end thats ready for the scrap pile. If one wishes to build a shorty with bayonet lugs and sight locator lugs intact, you can turn down the cut down barrel's muzzle then bore out the chopped off muzzle section to a slip fit and silver solder in place. This can also be done if fitting a custom tightbore barrel, to preserve the original configuration. High Force 44 is the best silver solder for this sort of work. |
|
December 29, 2012, 08:13 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,477
|
Within the last 10 years or so, a number of companies have been offering "Tanker" versions of surplus bolt action rifles as a means of offering something new to the gun buyer.
I've seen these #4 and even #3 Lee Enfield's shortened to "Tanker" carbines as well as US Model 1917's and various 98 Mauser's. |
December 30, 2012, 12:33 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,482
|
I suggest PMing Tikirocker about your rifle. He is a veritable encyclopedia on all things enfield, but I have not seen him around lately.
|
December 30, 2012, 09:58 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 909
|
PM received, reply sent ... Happy New Year all!
Tiki.
__________________
The Lee Enfield forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewforum.php?f=27 Surplus Rifle Forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/index.php |
January 1, 2013, 11:58 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,482
|
So, we've seen the range report, but what was the history on it?
|
January 1, 2013, 01:08 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: December 11, 2005
Location: ohio
Posts: 38
|
I had one of these back about 5 years ago, nice con no disk, all matching, crowned, no cut marks, nice shooter for 100.00
|
January 1, 2013, 02:51 PM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
Check out Ian Skennerton's The Lee Enfield Story, page 434. There is an "Experimental No. 1 Shortened & Lightened Rifle." Except for the disk, it looks just like the one in the image.
Markings are: MA Lithgow SMLE III* 1944 A few were made in England but a batch of 100 were made in Australia for army trials in 1944. Serial numbers are preceded by "XP" and were numbered from 1 to 100.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
January 1, 2013, 03:07 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
4v50 Gary,
if I recall correctly the number 1 enfield's bolt face is larger than the number 4's which mimics the same contours as the bolt body. also the decockers are rounded on number 1s. unless they also tried updating the sights on the experimental number 1s they would have barrel mounted rear sights instead of reciever mounted like the one in the picture. the magazine is also consistent with a number 4 rather than number 1. the front sight post, forward stock band... all are parts consistent with a cut down number 4, I could see little use in the australian military experimenting with converting a number 1 to a number 4 when the time and money needed could have just been better spent adopting a modified number 4 instead.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
January 1, 2013, 03:17 PM | #18 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
The "No. 1" should not be mistaken for an earlier No. 1 rifle that was modified but rather as meaning experiment No. 1.
The bolt knob in the image is round (but I can't tell if its hollowed out). The decocker is like that found on the later MK IV and the Australian Jungle Carbine. Ditto with the front sight band. The magazines are the same too. Suggest you get the book via interlibrary loan.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
January 4, 2013, 02:53 PM | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Posts: 1
|
scope
I am also looking to put a replica scope mount on my enfield #4 mk1, but the bad part is i am looking to spend about 100 (college budget). any ideas where to look.
__________________
-Jack |
January 4, 2013, 05:26 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
A replica isn't going to happen on a $100. budget. You might get a no drill no tap add on though.
There are several under $100, but none replicate the original in look or function. They do let you add a scope but in ways different from the screw in pads of the original system. B-Square makes one for about $50 (although I don't care for it's quality). There are a couple of others that use the rear sight axis pin & charger bridge that work fairly wel, Do a quick google & you'll find them easily.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
January 4, 2013, 06:01 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: Sweet Home
Posts: 886
|
I bet that thing puts out a huge fireball.
__________________
Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. |
January 4, 2013, 11:37 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2012
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 223
|
Bama Shooter, I thought it would kick like a mule, be loud, and emit a large fireball but I got none of that when I fired it. Although I shot it around 2pm in the afternoon on a sunny day. I've seen pictures of Mosins and they have a pretty good fireball but this one didn't. I was shooting MilSurp ammo (1964) so who knows.
|
January 5, 2013, 08:29 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,482
|
You're killing me! What did you learn from Tikirocker WRT the pedigree of your unusual rifle?
|
January 5, 2013, 08:51 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,217
|
I dont know anything about it. But, I have the same rifle. Only diference is that mine has had the wood removed from the top of the barrel and stained to a redish hue.
__________________
Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it. Milton Freidman "If you find yourself in a fair fight,,, Your tactics suck"- Unknown |
January 6, 2013, 01:39 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2012
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 223
|
globemaster3, Tikirocker just said that it was a "Mutt" and to re-barrel it and put on new furniture and then it might be worth something. Here's his qoute "The rifle is not original or a legit Lee Enfield item, rather these rifles were cut down post war and sold by certain companies in the U.S and retailed as novelties with names like "Tankers" and "Tanker Cabines" etc. These never existed, were never issued by any Commonwealth nation who used the No4 and are a complete fiction.
If you ever get a hankering to restore it, replace the shortened barrel and fit a replacement fore-end and hand guards - I wager you'd add more value to it than what it is worth in its current form." Cheers, Tiki. \I guess he didn't like it. I think it has a bit of "cool" Factor and I'm leaving it like it is. By the way, the brass disc has nothing on it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|