|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 25, 2016, 09:57 PM | #26 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,674
|
Everything gets a velocity increase from a longer barrel, even loads optimized for handgun barrel lengths. How much of an increase varies.
The problem with a semi carbine in .357 Sig or 10mm is there is no purpose built carbine for them, and adaptation of existing designs is ...cumbersome. I expect you could do it with an AR, the drawback being a lot of excess..space and material. Blow back is possible, but would have to be too heavy to be popular, if even practical. So, locked breech is the way to go, but its still going to be heavier, more complex, and more expensive than alternatives (like lever guns) Also I would be quite surprised if the .357 Sig matches the .357 Magnum outside of the 125gr load in any barrel length.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
May 25, 2016, 10:13 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
Yeah I was thinking something along the lines of the Ruger pistol cartridge carbines or Marlin Camp Guns of the past. I wouldn't expect the Sig to outperform the Magnum but I think it would easily surpass a similar rifle in 9mm. 9x23 comes to mind also. I had a 9mm Camp Gun years ago, it was a really fun way to burn through one hell of a lot of 9mm ammo!
__________________
Walnut and Gloss Blue, mostly! |
May 26, 2016, 03:53 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2007
Posts: 1,707
|
Warning... thread drift
Some anecdotal information, or grist for the mill I suppose. I had an acquaintance who was a cop in Oklahoma years ago. They had M1 Carbines as patrol rifles. He was called out to dispatch a rabid dog. He told me he shot that dog several times with the carbine, and it would scream and yell and what have you and finally went down.
-This could be a testament to poor marksmanship, or it could be evidence of poor performance from that cartridge. I wasn't there. However, having observed him shoot other rifles, I concluded for my purposes that the cartridge itself did not perform very well. I have shot coyotes with the 357 mag from a long gun, and put them down with one shot. I know that it is an effective cartridge in that application. FWIW. |
May 26, 2016, 10:22 AM | #29 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,674
|
Quote:
First off, we don't know what ammo was used. Odds are even or better it was FMJ, which is never a good performer on smaller animals. ' Second, there is no mention of where the bullets hit, and even good shots MISS sometimes. And while it is quite possible the cartridge didn't perform well (because of an improper bullet for the target), It's also possible they weren't good shots, despite the shooter being skilled. As an example, one time, ages ago, a friend was visiting, we were plinking off the back deck, and got a call from the neighbor to come over and dispatch a skunk. My friend was using a Marlin .357 Mag carbine. I was wearing (and not planning to use) a Ruger Blackhawk .45Colt. Range was short (20-30 feet), my friend shot, skunk "hunched" and continued on. Second shot, same result. 3rd shot must have clipped the spine, as skunk's back legs stopped working. At this point, my friend asked me to finish the skunk. (said he was worried about ricochet..) Small argument, but I took over. One round (in the head) was all that was needed. My friend, who was a big fan of, and a good shot with the .357 lever gun, failed miserably that day. Poor choice of ammo (158gr SWC Win Luballoy is NOT good for small game, it just sails right through), and poor shot placement (all his shots went in behind the diaphragm) led to a wounded animal that should have been, and could have been dispatched with a single WELL placed shot. The rifle was "on", he was a good shot, but for some reason, he couldn't make a good shot on that skunk. Now if I just said "shot 3 times and not dispatched" you might conclude the .357 "failed", but the reality is that it didn't fail, it wasn't allowed to succeed. One round in the right spot would have done it. One round of a JHP probably would have done it very impressively. Multiple shots, and not getting the job done was the fault of the shooter, not the cartridge, in this case.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
May 26, 2016, 01:40 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,272
|
.30 carbine v. .357/125
I've shot quite a bit of .30 carbine FMJ at paper. I've shot .357/125 from a Marlin lever carbine at all sorts of ferals and pests. Given my lack of field experience with the carbine on game, I can't say how effective a .30carbine HP might be as a field round.
I can tell you with much certainty that the .357/125 from a carbine is grim death on critters around 100 lbs and under. The 125 JHP, driven 500 fps or so faster than its design threshold for expansion, is plain destructive, absolutely violent. I've no doubt it would serve well as a SD and medium hunting load as well, but I'd use a heavier bullet on deer myself. I'm thinking that 2000 fps for the .357/125 is a conservative estimate, and one might just push the .357/110 gr slug even faster. My manuals show 23---2400 fps as possible w/ the 110, can't say what factory ammo would do. The rim on the .357 (or any rimmed ctg) as an auto loader is the issue. I've read somewhere that the Duraganov mag, and the PSL mag, which used the rimmed x54R cartridge, took some serious design work. The Brits made the .303 (also rimmed) work in the Bren gun, as well as their 10 rd SMLE bolt rifle. And S&W had a taget auto that fed rimmed .38 wadcutters ,and the big Coonan auto pistol makes the .357 rim work too. So it can be done. Ruger solved the issue with their first semi .44 carbine by using a tube/shotgun/lever style mag, and the rotary box with the second version.(M99?) What the heck do I know, but I'm thinking that the rotary box, ala 10/22 second gen .44 carbine M99, might be worked out to serve as a higher capacity extended version, like the more recent hi-caps that serve in the 10/22 family and are so popular these days. Had Ruger done that with the second gen .44 carbine, and painted it black with a rail, had a folding pistol gripped stock as an optoin, and it might well have sold better. Coopers "Thumper" , from Ruger. Use the wood stock and a flush 5 rd mag, and us brush hunters would have the carbine we like too. The other issue is demand. Ruger stopped their SA pistol cal carbines, the PC , and both generations of .44, cause they apparently could not sell enough of them. I suspect they would not sell many .357's either. I believe the cowboy shooters, and the link to the old west, still carries the lever carbines in .38/.357. There is no such link to the mag pistol caliber SA carbines, who have to compete with full blown AR types and cheaper to shoot 9mm types. |
May 26, 2016, 06:07 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Quote:
Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
|
May 27, 2016, 04:56 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2007
Posts: 1,707
|
Quote:
Nonetheless, I do have personal experience with the 357 in a lever gun on coyotes. It is a remarkably effective cartridge/firearm combination in that application. Granted none I shot were rabid (that I know of), which may be a mitigating factor, but they were canids with similar structure to other canids, and they go down right smartly when shot with a 357 magnum 160 grain RNFP cast bullet. Probably much more smartly with a hollow point. |
|
May 27, 2016, 05:37 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
Why would a cast RNFP be so much more effective than a HP? Penetration shouldn't be an issue here, pistol bullets at rifle velocities land like a bomb. I had an H&R Topper in 44 magnum that I was loading 200gr Hornady HP's. These were incredibly destructive on varmints and feral animals. Would have ruined a deer.
__________________
Walnut and Gloss Blue, mostly! |
May 27, 2016, 09:33 AM | #34 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Aw, Guv, don't shoot Bambi in the eating part. No meat damage, that way.
|
May 27, 2016, 10:11 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
It was like a Hydrogen Bomb!
Maybe a little exaggeration there.
__________________
Walnut and Gloss Blue, mostly! |
June 1, 2016, 09:55 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
The one on the left has; -Higher pressure -More case capacity (if I'm not mistaken) -More OAL flexibility (max bullet weight) -Larger bore diameter (powder energy efficiency for a given barrel length) Not sure why there'd even be a question (unless this is yet another "that widdle round couldn't even punch a Chicom's wool jacket" nonsense query --file that with the NYC 9mm's that supposedly couldn't get through duck cloth ) TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|