|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 4, 2013, 05:43 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2012
Posts: 388
|
'I will break your finger' says the instructor to the student
My friend recently took a shooting class. The instructor told him - 'If you do that I will break your finger'. The context was that my friend put his finger on unloaded gun at the range while the gun was pointed down at target. Friend feels that Instructor was too kind of racist and should have been polite. I don't know if it is that. what do you think?
|
November 4, 2013, 05:57 AM | #2 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,591
|
Quote:
ETA: Quote:
__________________
- Jon Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation. 9mm vs .45 ACP? The answer is .429 Last edited by WeedWacker; November 4, 2013 at 06:09 AM. Reason: Additional info |
||
November 4, 2013, 06:34 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 7, 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 2,736
|
I teach firearm safety. I would never use words that threaten an individual if he/she broke one of the commandments of firearm safety during a training class. If someone told me they were going to "break my finger", I'd probably offer to let them try. What I would do, and have done, is threaten to have them leave the class for making too many repeated safety violations or not paying attention. I have every right to do that. If they fail to follow instructions a warning may be given. Repeated failure could result in dismissal from the class. I'd need more info to decide about the racial bias. Was language used that was racist? Just feeling like you were discriminated against for being warned about making a safety error isn't discrimination.
|
November 4, 2013, 07:53 AM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
The instructor needs to work on his instructional techniques. Threatening someone is unacceptable.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
November 4, 2013, 07:54 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
|
I can't say much about the instructor's response to your friend's unsafe actions since we don't have all the details, but I must admit that I'm trying to figure out how "If you do that I will break your finger" can be considered racist?
Do only people of a certain race have fingers where you live? |
November 4, 2013, 07:57 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
|
Quote:
|
|
November 4, 2013, 08:17 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2006
Location: Pennsy
Posts: 720
|
Without more testimony about the incident it would be premature to make judgment. The tone and volume of the warning, the physical expression, even the distance between the individuals are important pieces of evidence.
That said any time an instructor, range/safety officer encounters a safety question their response must be immediately and resolute. New shooters do not always appreciate the inherent dangers of what may appear to be a minor indiscretion. The range officer will always be seen as the 'bad guy' by the person receiving the admonishment as no one wants to be called on the carpet. But safety rules are in place for everyones sake. In the order of responsibility it's OIC'S [officer in charge] range. They are ultimately accountable. No instructor, range officer,block officer or director ever wants an injury to occur on their watch.
__________________
David NRA Benefactor Member Distinguished Rifleman #731 Presidents 100 |
November 4, 2013, 08:19 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,969
|
Seems the instructor needs to work on his communication skills and the student needs to work on his listening skills. oh, what WeedWacker said too.
|
November 4, 2013, 08:34 AM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
|
hmmm this is such a funny loaded question that i just got to say something.
if a cashier swipes their carton of milk twice, is the cashier racist? if the automated checkout line breaks out mid transaction, is the automated checkout line racist? if their box of "super winky wunder cereal" come without the promised toy in it, is the cereal box racist? |
November 4, 2013, 08:45 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
How is this a "race" issue? Is your friend Taiwanese and does the instructor have something against Taiwanese people?
Moving past race, I have several comments: 1. You do not provide enough information for anyone to opine on what your friend was doing that caused the instructor to make the comment. Was the gun at rest? Firing line cold? Did your friend touch the gun with his index finger? Was he playing with the gun when he shouldn't have been? Was he holding the gun, pressing the trigger while the line was cold? Did he violate a particular range rule? Did he read the range rules? 2. Any instructor who threatens to break a student's finger for any reason is a blowhard idiot who has less control over his mouth than your friend apparently has over his itchy trigger finger. The best way for your friend to handle the situation is immediately comply with whatever rule he was apparently breaking. Then, after the lesson go up to the instructor privately and express to him how unprofessional it was for him to threaten to break someone's fingers. Most likely your friend is paying for the instruction, and the instructor isn't a government paid military drill instructor. If the one-on-one conversation with the instructor only elicited more snarky remarks from the instructor, then write a letter to the company he works for. If he's just some one-off independent instructor, and your friend doesn't feel confronting him would do any good, then just safely pack up your things and leave. |
November 4, 2013, 08:49 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
I'm confused.
Why do you think an admittedly over the top instructor was being "racist" be enforcing range safety rules? Was race an element of the situation?
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 4, 2013, 08:53 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2012
Posts: 527
|
how many times was your friend given the instructions before the "threat"?
did your friend touch the weapon again? how old are you and your friend? |
November 4, 2013, 08:55 AM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
'I've had some VERY good classes (notably at Gunsite from Herschel Davis and John Bowman) where a good part of the instructor's banter was technically a "threat". I would very seriously doubt that the instructor was really going to break the student's finger."
That kind of comment tends to immediately establish an adversarial relationship between the shooter and the instructor. That's rarely the type of relationship that is beneficial to the shooter. When I was teaching I would NEVER think to make that kind of statement.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
November 4, 2013, 09:42 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2012
Posts: 388
|
I will let you guys know all you ask, after I talk with my friend. And that will be tomorrow. Yes, he paid for the classes. It was a beginners shooting class.
|
November 4, 2013, 09:44 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: Stillwater, OKlahoma
Posts: 8,638
|
That's the old drill sergeant mentality,,,
That's the old drill sergeant mentality,,,
It's a holdover from times when former military were the norm at gun ranges. It's just stupid to continue that type of range management. I've run into it and will never put up with it,,, It is as unacceptable as a range master I knew of in Riverside, California,,, This man would put his hand on his holstered 1911 while yelling in your face R. Lee Ermey style. No one has the right to yell at you,,, Or threaten you in any manner,,, Whether it be verbally,,, Or implied. It is simply bad behavior and should not be allowed under any circumstance. Aarond .
__________________
Never ever give an enemy the advantage of a verbal threat. Caje: The coward dies a thousand times, the brave only once. Kirby: That's about all it takes, ain't it? Aarond is good,,, Aarond is wise,,, Always trust Aarond! (most of the time) |
November 4, 2013, 09:54 AM | #16 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
It depends entirely on the relationship/interactions between the two parties. If they're bantering back and forth, if their personalities "align", there's a lot to it. It's like one guy says to another "I'll kill you!" Are they best friends or worst enemies or something in between? Completely changes the situation. Was this instructor growling between his teeth or laughing out loud? Was there a context to a prior statement that had the whole class laughing?
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
November 4, 2013, 10:29 AM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,477
|
Quote:
That said, I join with others who are wondering just how a simple, physical threat is "racist." |
|
November 4, 2013, 11:34 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 7, 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 2,736
|
Quote:
|
|
November 4, 2013, 11:35 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,903
|
I find the "break your finger" remark to be just fine -- said in obvious over-the-top-banter -- and far less humiliating than "I will eject you without refund."
Sorry troops. That's my take. (and hardly "racist" -- which has become a catch-all Red Queen throw-down card these days) |
November 4, 2013, 11:42 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2013
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 165
|
Assuming no racism, I'd want to know the tone of the instructor's comment. The words were clearly out of line but I'd want to know the tone before judging. If it was harsh, then totally out of line. The instructor could have gotten his point across in a much more polite manner.
On the other hand, the words could have been said with a clear understanding that the instructor wasn't going to break the person's finger. Sounds like that wasn't the case though. |
November 4, 2013, 12:23 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
I agree on the "racist" part. It is becoming a meaningless term as its applied to so many things that have nothing at all to do with race. I also notice the OP did not respond to my question if there was an actual element conducive to racism involved.
Would I instruct this way? No! Absolutely not. There are two basic instructional techniques. Supportive & instructive. In this technique you encourage correct performance by positive reinforcement & reduce negative traits by explaining why they are bad things. This is done so the student understands, not just follows "Monkey see, monkey do" mindlessly. The second is more military in its concept. basically "Do it because I'm the instructor & that's the way I say it should be done! (based on the instructor's assumed higher level of knowledge & experience.) Physical threats have no part, even in jest, in a civilian training program of any kind. The instructor needs what Wal-Mart calls "Corrective Counseling for success". If a physical threat were acceptable he'd be getting a punch in the jaw.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 4, 2013, 12:32 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Is that any different than when a student inadvertently sweeps someone who says, "If you do that again, I'm gonna' take it personally?"
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
November 4, 2013, 01:11 PM | #23 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Let's sidestep the race issues, folks. They're not relevant.
I have heard that accusation made simply because the accuser didn't get the result they wanted from an interaction. At this point, we're dealing with a "my friend said this happened" story, and we don't know if that's even remotely what happened.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
November 4, 2013, 01:34 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
If friend was offended, the simple solution was to stop right there, get a manager, demand money back for reason's stated and find a different place to take his shooting class.
Sounds as though this instructor has just not yet addressed the 'right' person in this threatening 'wrong' way. |
November 4, 2013, 02:02 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,591
|
I think the problem is the syntax, context, and environment which we are not privy to. The instructor, as stated, could have been attempting to use hyperbole in a humorous context, but he failed in communicating his intention. The other option, which has been mentioned and is no less a possibility, is that the instructor is a dip stick.
However, I would agree that bodily threats do nothing to teach and/or correct a mistake which is the opportunity for learning.
__________________
- Jon Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation. 9mm vs .45 ACP? The answer is .429 |
|
|