The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 2, 2013, 05:05 PM   #1
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
1866 versus 1873

Those of you who know about both, can you provide a comparison? Lets consider only clones for this discussion unless you speak of features of the originals which are pertinent. I have been wanting an 1873 but I found an Uberti 1866 which should go pretty cheap.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 07:01 PM   #2
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,195
1866 is a brass frame which is heavier. The 73 has side plates which are removable which help with clearing jams and make cleaning easier.
Hawg is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 07:14 PM   #3
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,862
I'd go with a Henry '66 instead of the '73 Winchester. Certainly the Winchester is more modern (loading gate, closed bottom magazine), but I'm into the Civil War.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 07:27 PM   #4
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
two pertinent responses...Thanks

How about feed problems. Smoothness of the action.

The 66 goes new for about 130.00 less than the 73. Probly has more to do with the marketplace than the cost to manufacture (I am guessing).

The one I am looking at is in 38-40. How about any experience with that cartridge.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 08:08 PM   #5
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,195
The 1866 is a Winchester and has a loading gate. The Henry was an 1860. Production ceased in 1866 a year after the war.
Here you go Doc. Everything you ever wanted to know about the 38-40. http://www.chuckhawks.com/38-40win.htm
Hawg is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 09:44 PM   #6
Crunchy Frog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
No personal experience with the .38-40 but in case you don't know, the name of the cartridge is somewhat strange. It is derived from the .44-40 (the original chambering of the 1873 Winchester. The .44-40 was a .44 caliber bullet over forty grains of black powder. You'd think the .38-40 was a .38 caliber bullet over 40 grains of powder, right? Wrong! It's a .40 caliber bullet over .38 grains of black powder. According to Larry Potterfield, anyway: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8Zd0lZk-B8

My "main match" rifle is a Uberti 1873 chambered in .357. After my wife started shooting with me, I lucked into a Uberti 1866 chambered in .38 Special in a local pawn shop and bought it for her. I had to because she was about to take my '73!

Just for information purposes, the "real" 1866 Winchester was chambered in .44 Henry (same as the 1860 Henry rifle), a rimfire cartridge that is not being made today. According to the Uberti website, their reproduction 1866 rifles are available in .38 Special, .44-40 or .45 Colt. I have heard of other chamberings such as .44 Special and others may be out there.

The Uberti '66 and '73s are similar in several respects and both are fine. Mechanically they are pretty much the same which means they are distressingly stiff out of the box given the price but both slick up great if you will fork up a little more money. Both of our rifles eat ammo like candy. Personally I prefer the '73 but I got such a great deal on the '66 that I snapped it up.

As Hawg Haggen (howdy, Hawg) pointed out, the brass receiver makes the '66 a good bit heavier and it has a different balance point than the '73. Since I bought the '66 for my wife, who is kind of petite, this was a consideration, especially since the one I found is a "short rifle" with a 20 inch octagon barrel with a little .38 caliber bore. The rifle was a good bit heavier than my '73 with the same tube. I ended up having the '66 barrel bobbed to about 17 inches.

One mechanical difference is that the '73 has a lever safety that prevent the rifle from firing unless the lever is fully closed (there is a small spring loaded plunger behind the trigger that is depressed by the lever when closed). The '66 lacks this feature so there is some risk of an "out of battery discharge" if the trigger is pressed before the lever is fully closed. Some of the older (much older) Uberti 1866 reproductions had a lever safety but this feature actually first appeared on the 1873 Winchester rifle. I would not dismiss the '66 on this basis (else I would not have purchased one for my wife) but it's a comparison point.

There are more variations of the '73 available. For example you can choose between a "straight stock" or a "pistol grip stock" on the '73. All of the Uberti '66s I have seen are straight stocked. You can get the '73 chambered in .357 (the '66s are .38 Special) and Uberti offers the '73 carbine in .44 Magnum. Some of the '73 have blued receivers but most have the very attractive "color casehardened" (OK, it's a faux finish) finish on the receiver. The '66s have a brass receiver and some folks really like that so that's a subjective comparison point.

My Uberti '73 is the single most expensive firearm I have every purchased. It has been worth every penny. My wife thinks her '66 is the cat's whiskers. You can't go wrong with either.
Crunchy Frog is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 11:08 PM   #7
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
CF....

Thanks a lot for the data.

I guess I might as well admit that I will prolly do like your did and wind up wif both of them.

Situation is that the 66 I am looking at is at a pawn shop as well. The asking price is 900.00. At that price I would simply add a hundred and thirty and buy a new one from Buffalo. This rifle is not in perfect shape and the 38-40 chambering would add yet another bullet I would have to be prepared to reload.

The action is stilll tight and the inside of the receiver is nice and clean. The brassis dull. The wood has some bruises in it that would take refinishing to get out. There is a large engraved inscription on the right side of the receiver which I think was put there after the purchase. That is a turn off. This thing could clean up into a nice rifle, but it isn't worth 900.00.

I saw the rifle about three months ago and asked for the bottom line. The owner told me he'd come off his price by fifty bucks. I declined so he knows I am not interested at 850.00. Just went to the shop again today and the rifle is still there with the same price. I am going to give it another coupla months and see what happens.

I am happy to have y'all's comments. You have told me what I needs to know.

I know the owner will come down but I don't know how much.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 11:41 PM   #8
vostracker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 416
Both

I agree with what Hawg and Crunchy said. You need both anyway!

Last edited by vostracker; December 2, 2013 at 11:41 PM. Reason: add info
vostracker is offline  
Old December 3, 2013, 01:14 AM   #9
Crunchy Frog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
Keep in mind that the .38-40 ammo, or components to reload it, are going to be significantly more expensive.

Also .38-40 (like .44-40) is a bottlenecked cartridge with a thin case neck so it's a little more complicated to reload. No carbide dies so you have to lube the cased before resizing.

Black powder shooters like these cartridges because the thin wall cases make a good seal in the chamber, preventing gas and fouling from flowing back into the action.

If you are not a black powder shooter I would pass on this rifle even if it were not significantly overpriced.

I'll send you a PM.
Crunchy Frog is offline  
Old December 3, 2013, 09:11 PM   #10
vostracker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 416
caliber

I'd think about saving up and getting a new one in a caliber you already have. I've been weeding out some of my collection a little at a time to consolidate my calibers. Good luck!
vostracker is offline  
Old December 3, 2013, 09:50 PM   #11
Beagle333
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Auburn, AL.
Posts: 2,332
Fortunately, Starline makes and sells new 38-40 brass.
__________________
.
.
.
Have a Colt and a smile.
Beagle333 is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 08:09 AM   #12
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
I have about decided….

To steer clear of the used 66 in FL primarily because of the caliber. I have a Henry in .357 and traded it away for a .45 LC.

If this guy won't come down from 850.00 my opinion is that the rifle is overpriced.

But even at a good price, the idea of beginning to reload a seventh different round is not a choice I would willingly make.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 12:11 PM   #13
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,719
I just negotiated a price and contracted to buy a used Uberti .38-40 saddle ring carbine a few minutes ago for $625, shipped.

The problem is some gaudy inscriptions on each side...



... I think I can live with it though.

This one was also in a Florida pawn shop, but I don't think it's the same one because the seller was originally at $699 + shipping.
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 01:16 PM   #14
Crunchy Frog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
You could purchase new sideplates to replace the engraved ones but I doubt it would be cost effective.

At least it's not someone else's name engraved on it.
Crunchy Frog is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 05:11 PM   #15
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
JBar...

That is it!

Dade City, FL



When I make my monthly excursion to the University Main Campus, I stay at a Hampton Inn about a quarter mile from it.

Do you live close by?
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 05:13 PM   #16
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,719
Wow, he came down a BUNCH!
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 05:16 PM   #17
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
Yes...He dropped the price a good bit

When I visited the shop, the 899.00 price tag was still on it. that was about two or three days ago.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 07:02 PM   #18
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,719
Do I live close by?

No.

I live in the foothills of the Great Divide near Helena, MT.

I have seven other .38-40 rifles and three Ruger Vaquero .40 S&W/.38-40 convertibles, as well as many, many dozens of bags of WW brass. Sportsman's Warehouse closed it out a few years ago, and I bought every bag left in the warehouse for something like $9.17 a bag.
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 07:42 PM   #19
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,719
It was won by a Cowboy Action Shooter by the name of "Whitehair Trigger".

http://sassnet.com/forums/index.php?...1#entry2771307
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 10:17 PM   #20
Crunchy Frog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
Small world, right?
Crunchy Frog is offline  
Old December 5, 2013, 07:46 AM   #21
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
Yep...Small world...

I am happy that someone got it who would rally use it and appreciate it.

As I said previously, I had about decided not to buy it because of the various aspects of the rifle. (Wrong caliber for me, condition and price, which actually turned out not to be a factor.)

I am also happy to learn that the owner of the shop has figured out how to reach a larger market. He is a decent guy and deserves to be successful.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 5, 2013, 09:17 AM   #22
Bootsie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2007
Location: Hofheim/Germany
Posts: 102
According to the few gunsmiths I know who are initiates of repairung and tuning cowboy guns here in Germany they advise:
# over the years Uberti changed both their Win 66 and 73 significantly. This implies no more spares might be available for earlier production rifles or carbines. The 66 was made from as early as 1963 if memory serves.
# due to this situation these smiths refuse to tune or repair Uberti lever guns with a prefix before "W" in front of the serial number because modern made parts will not interchange.
Bootsie is offline  
Old December 5, 2013, 11:02 AM   #23
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
Good, Wolf

I don't know the age of that rifle, but I did handle it and the action is relatively tight. By that I mean appears to be in good condition and appears (to me) to have been used little.

It is a nice rifle. I think JBar will be happy with it. He got it for what I consider to be a good price.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath.
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old December 6, 2013, 12:23 AM   #24
Crunchy Frog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 591
1866 versus 1873

There are some older Uberti rifles circulating that don't match up to the recent imports. A friend has an early '66 that he cannot upgrade. I passed up a .38 caliber 1866 carbine because it was an early import. Not cheap either!
Crunchy Frog is offline  
Old December 8, 2013, 04:16 PM   #25
John Barleycorn
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2013
Posts: 7
BP clean up

I think the 73 is easier to clean after shooting BP.
John Barleycorn is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10412 seconds with 8 queries