The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 3, 2010, 03:33 PM   #1
Joey V.
Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2010
Posts: 55
Conicals from a single shot pistol? Manual can't be right?

I have a Traditions William Parker pistol 1-20 twist that I have been playing with and so far it shoots like a dream. The manual said it handles 45 grains of FFF with either round balls or conicals. Something occurred to me last night that how can that be right??? This is a .50 Cal and I shoot 300 - 385 grain conical from it with a 45G powder charge. It is devastating and I like to hunt deer at bow range with this pistol load. Now you can't tell me that the barrel pressure isn't MASSIVELY greater with the conical than the round balls? That being said do you think the manufacturer lowballed the max power charge or am I thinking wrong? Do you guys think this is safe for me to do even though traditions said its ok?

Thx
Joey V.
Joey V. is offline  
Old November 3, 2010, 03:40 PM   #2
hickstick_10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2009
Posts: 477
should be safe.

And 45 grains is a very mild/conservative load, so I wouldn't worry to much about the pressure difference.
hickstick_10 is offline  
Old November 3, 2010, 03:48 PM   #3
Joey V.
Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2010
Posts: 55
THANKS!!!!!

I was wondering about the whole max load thing too with modern pistols. I have a pedersoli Howdah pistol that can handle 80 grains per the manual and the barrels on that SOB are only half the thickness of the William parker.

I remember seeing a Myth busters TV episode where they keep adding a 10 grain charge of BP to a rifle to see if it would actually blow up. Conclusion; it didn't... They filled it the entire way to the end of the barrel and seated a ball. In the end they had to weld the barrel to get it to blow and at that only the nipple blowout.....

I AM IN NO WAY CONDONING EXCEDDING MAX CHARGES!:barf:
Joey V. is offline  
Old November 4, 2010, 12:34 PM   #4
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Factory pistols are usually made with the same strength barrels as their rifles so your barrel should theoretically be able handle the same load of powder as their rifles.
The difference in the manufacturer's recommended loads may have to do with liability, accuracy and protecting the wood stock from getting cracked or splintered.
Maybe they figure that there's a percentage of people that will double load their pistol by accident so they cut their maximum charge by 1/2?
Or maybe some of the sidelock pistols just aren't proof tested with the same powder charges as the rifles are?
For instance the Traditions Buckhunter Pro .50 - .54 inline pistols were rated for:

25 - 50 grains for the most accurate load with either ball or conical
80 grains maximum load with either ball or conical


http://www.traditionsfirearms.com/~s...tol_manual.pdf

Last edited by arcticap; November 4, 2010 at 01:40 PM.
arcticap is offline  
Old November 5, 2010, 12:05 PM   #5
orangello
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Posts: 566
Noob here, i thought the max charge was also limited by barrel length due to the comparatively slow-burning nature of BP. IOW, the sidelock's barrel might not be damaged by a charge greater than the "max", but it wouldn't be able to burn all of the charge before the bullet left the barrel. Am i confusing myself again?

My only BP gun is a sidelock pistol from Traditions.
orangello is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04900 seconds with 10 queries