|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 21, 2012, 10:40 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Not Guilty of Making an illegal Firearm by Mental Defect?
I must admit, this case has me baffled. Here is a man, clearly mentally ill, who makes gun in which to kill himself then calls a a suicide hotline as a last grasp. They take him to the hospital for treatment and then
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...R_story_1.html Quote:
For the record the guy is a combat vet with the first Gulf War and Somalia to his record.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
February 22, 2012, 08:36 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
I don't understand the charges. It is legal for anyone who is not a prohibited person to make ("manufacture") a firearm for their own, personal use. Since that is not illegal, how can they charge him for it?
|
February 22, 2012, 09:20 AM | #3 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
State Law likely is the issue.
Can't say what the law is there, but if it's like NJ, you need a license to manufacture a firearm, even if for personal use. Federal Law might be OK with it, but under State Law it might be a criminal act. Willie . |
February 22, 2012, 11:19 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2000
Location: SLC,Utah
Posts: 2,704
|
Federal charges, eh? It's possible that the firearm he manufactured is a SBS or SBR. There's a few other possibilities, including that he's a prohibited person.
MTT TL, some people who are "crazy" are quite functional and rational in areas other than that of their illness. |
February 22, 2012, 01:30 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,184
|
http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke/wb/304757
According to this article they charged him with manufacture and possession of a destructive device. From reading that it appears that the device was designed to be deadly only to the person setting it off. Probably made to kill himself. |
February 22, 2012, 05:21 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
He was also carrying on campus which is against the rules, as well as trespassing.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
February 22, 2012, 05:26 PM | #7 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
The man needs help, not jail. Sometimes our system is really frigged up.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
February 22, 2012, 05:58 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Wait to see what happens. Competent defense and experts could handle this, it would seem.
However, being mentally ill is not sufficient - you have to meet precise standards for such a defense. Don't know the federal rules - probably easy to find. Typically: 1. Know right from wrong. 2. Be aware of the consequences of action. There are other and different versions.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
February 23, 2012, 07:10 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
Being a vet since 1995 didn't keep him from piling up convictions.
He has been convicted of public intoxication, DUI and destruction of property between 2006 and 2010. But who knows how many breaks he's been given already by the system and the local cops. Maybe they just finally got tired of his way of doing things. I know they're tired of cops being killed in Blacksburg and Montgomery County. The last one was in December, so I imagine they take a very dim view of disturbed people with guns on campus. John VPI Class of '72 |
February 23, 2012, 07:14 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
http://m.roanoke.com/mapp/story.aspx?arcID=304757
In his backpack he had "a crude, homemade gun fashioned from a piece of steel pipe, a shotgun shell and a nail rigged as a firing pin." |
February 24, 2012, 11:41 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
No (fed law) about making a gun for your own use, Legal gun that it.
Now if it was a smooth bore pipe to use shotgun shells, under federal law, wouldn't it have to be a certain length, w/18 inch barrel. If it fit in his back pack, then it seems to me it would have been an illegal or sawed off shotgun. Wasn't there, just guessing. Brings up another point. The FBI runs the Hazardous Device School at Huntsville AL. This is the only civilian LE bomb disposal school in the US. One of the things they taught us, was how to make a water cannon, which consist of noting but a short piece of pipe with an end cap, there was a hole in the end cap for the fuse/wire, and a 12 gage shell was fired in the pipe. It was a 12 gage shell full of BP and water is poured down the barrel held in with a proteolytic (rubber). How is that any different then what this guy did?
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
February 24, 2012, 10:05 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
According to today's Washington Post lead editorial, the pipe was 8 inches long.
I need to find the link to this. May I write a new headline for the editorial? WASHINGTON POST SUPPORTS CONCEALED CARRY WITHOUT A LICENSE because he wasn't hurting anybody. Okay, here it is http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...YWR_story.html "Virginia originally charged Mr. Duvall with carrying a concealed weapon without a license — a misdemeanor that carries a possible 12-month sentence and $2,500 fine. Even this charge seems uncalled for, given the circumstances and the fact that Mr. Duvall never threatened or attempted to harm anyone else" |
February 24, 2012, 10:30 PM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
Now, as to his mental state, depression isn't going to be remotely usable. In fact, I have never heard of using the insanity defense for ANY "posession" charge. I guess you would have to be able to proove that he "knew" it was against the law to have it, but didn't "understand" what illegal meant? I mean, how many times have we all heard that ignorance of the law is no exuse? You not knowing owning X is illegal does nothing to change the fact that you own X and it is illegal. Sane or insane, if they proove you own it, and proove it is illegal, you're guilty. Slam dunk. Now, not knowing its illegal (or perhaps being insane) might have an effect on the penalty applied to the conviction, but you will be convicted.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
February 24, 2012, 10:47 PM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
"How is that any different then what this guy did?"
The fact that "Law Enforcement" can break the law anytime they like and that "we the people" cannot? Willie . |
February 24, 2012, 10:57 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Quote:
Of course, and obvious problem with my idea is that with a pipe and a shotgun shell full of blackpowder, there would be nothing keeping you from loading the pipe with gravel or something similar, instead of water. |
|
February 25, 2012, 10:55 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
|
I am thinking that in order for an insanity plea the defendant would have to have been mentaly adjudicated (sp?) at the time he was found in pessesion of the said device. The fact that he volintarily surrendered himself for psyciatric evaluation, and was released on his own accord without being court ordered to a state mental isntitution will kill any attempts for an insanity plea.
Also if he does give a plea of insainity and the cour accepts it. He then has surrendered his 2nd amendment rights anyway. Now if he had been on some type of medication that he was having a bad reaction to there would be a temporary insanity plea. As far as if he had not been, then went to seek help, and showed signs of improvement while taking medication, and showed to be stable enough to be released he may have a defense. On a side note. I have seen veterans turned away from VA care that stated they were suicidal, and wanted to die. (I was standing right next to them when they said it, and were turned away. I had to take them to the emergency room of a hospital, and have a doctor call the judge who then issued a court order for them to be treated.) He does have some things he can use as a defense if he has a good attorney. Though it will take some doing, and a symapthetic jury. I am also sure a mental competence test will be doen before any hearing.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you. Last edited by m&p45acp10+1; February 25, 2012 at 11:03 AM. |
February 25, 2012, 01:10 PM | #17 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
What ever happened to discretion?
How about the guy was desperate, nearly killed himself, gave no indication of wanting or attempting to hurt anyone else, we get him help and the problem is solved? If he had almost killed himself with Tylenol, shall we nail him to the wall because "it is a violation of federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with it's labeling."? How about the next guy who contemplates calling the hotline and then remembers this story and figures, "Oh, hell no. I'm better off dead."? I lose more hope for our future every day. |
February 25, 2012, 02:07 PM | #18 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
While Suicide is seldom a crime (other than in the eyes of the church, etc.) simply because there is no living perpatrator to prosecute, attempted suicide is a crime in many jurisdictions.
And it always involves one's mental state. Generally, forced help is the penalty for that particular crime, rather than jail time. But that is a different issue than making and posessing an illegal firearm. One is not a prohibited person due to mental state until adjudicated one through due process. Based on that the information in hand so far, the charge must be "manufacturing and possession of an NFA weapon" without proper prior govt approval. And for that, I don't see how any mental state defintion would be involved. yes, the poor guy is in a bad way. He needs help more than jail. One would hope the legal system will take that into account. But it doesn't change the fact that he broke the law.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
February 26, 2012, 04:57 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,089
|
Quote:
It's no different than LE having LEGAL access to short barreled rifles, shotguns machine guns, destructive devises, etc. without each officer having to obtain a tax stamp for those items.....its an authorized official use. Federal law clearly exempts LE & military from certain aspects of the National Firearms Act.....this is why LE can get post '86 machine guns when civilians cannot.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|
February 28, 2012, 04:34 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
"What ever happened to discretion?"
They saved his life (according to him), got him off the street (and off the Tech campus where'd he been roaming around armed for a week) and got some leverage on him to get him into treatment. So now the update. From today's Washington Post, page B1. Under an agreement reached in federal court Monday, he will avoid gun charges if he completes court-madated counseling. It seems there's this new thing called "Verterans Treatment Court." If he completes the program the charges will be dropped. This is the first felony case referred to the vets treatment court, which is modeled after drug treatment courts. He has to show up in court monthly for 6 months to update his progress and then the federal charges can be dropped. The state charges were dropped some time ago because the feds wanted the case. Isn't this what everybody wanted, for the man to get treatment? Not a suggestion to get treatment, but ordered to get it? |
February 28, 2012, 05:29 PM | #21 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
The upside seems tremendous. http://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/2018...atment-courts/ Quote:
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
||
February 28, 2012, 05:31 PM | #22 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Sounds like a fair solution.
|
February 28, 2012, 06:53 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Posts: 4,092
|
The fact that the guy was going to commit suicide is important.
He needs psychiatric help. If putting him in jail for a year or two saves his life because he gets treatment,I say jail him. Otherwise he could go off and kill your family. Think of this guy as already dead and you'll understand that everyday he's lived after the attempt is a good one-in jail or not. He needs help and he should be forced to get it. There is no freedom in killing yourself or someone else God forbid because you were messed up in the head. |
|
|