|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 11, 2012, 10:44 AM | #76 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
John,
I cannot see the data, I am not a member of the high road. Unverifiable data is meaningless. The police shooting stats on the other hand can be easily verified.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
July 11, 2012, 11:35 AM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 4, 2012
Posts: 203
|
A lot of theoreticals at play based on a spreadsheet. An interesting spreadsheet though that causes some sobering thought but doesn't necessarily reflect reality.
One thing that jumps out though is capacity matters. I hear a lot of scoffing from people about double stack magazines or why you even need more than six shots. Shooting in the heat of the moment is not the same as shooting at the range. Someone who is a proficient shot at targets may not find they are anywhere near as proficient when adrenaline is pumping and weapons are drawn. Your first shot is probably going to miss unless we're talking point blank. There was a reason I wanted at least 10 rounds in the magazine when I selected a .45 The second thing that occurs to me that capacity or not, your odds of winning a fight against multiple armed opponents are not good. If I was armed with a pocket pistol, my most likely weapon, then we're talking 6 rounds of relatively low caliber. If I'm looking at two or more assailants then my tactic is fire and retreat. I want it to be clear I am not worth the trouble. However, due to the first point I am starting to rethink my opinion that I won't need a second magazine. Reloading is a dodgy prospect but it seems that 6 rounds isn't going to do the job. As mentioned before, there is also a lag as I am not going to instantly jump into the role of shooter. You hope that once you pull a gun the bad guys will back down. If it comes to shooting, his buddy or buddies will retreat. Survival looks pretty grim if the second assailant decides to attack. Maybe off topic, but I think your best weapon is situational awareness. The idea of armed is for a worst case scenario, but you should also do everything you can to avoid a worst case scenario. I'd love to say I'd have my .45 on me at all times, but practicality will overrule that. The Texas summer months are too brutal to always wear clothing that makes concealment of a compact pistol possible. Also, this ain't Hollywood. I don't like my odds if outnumbered. I do wonder if most people have been like myself and thought mostly about self defense scenarios against a lone attacker. Maybe a better question is how often do violent crimes occur with a single perpetrator versus multiple perpetrators. |
July 11, 2012, 01:49 PM | #78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
Quote:
Don't: go to Stupid Places with Stupid People and do Stupid umm... >Stuff< and you greatly decrease your chances of needing your weapon in the 1st place. But this data and discussion is prompting me to think again about getting a S&W 642/442 and trying harder to do decent with it so that I will have an easier to carry backup gun.
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
|
July 11, 2012, 10:58 PM | #79 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
July 12, 2012, 08:55 AM | #80 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 1,321
|
Yesterday, I used a shot timer to conduct a speed & accuracy test of 4 different Glock pistols: 29SF, 30SF, 27, 26.
* Edit: all of those ^ have a NY trigger (8#) The 2nd shot times were not all that different, but consistent accuracy was. I put a 6" circle on a larger target placed 6 yards (18 feet) away. My goal is to keep all shots on the 6" circle, with the least amount of time from 1st - 2nd shot. The 29 SF magazines had a Pearce +0 baseplate with room for pinky, the 30 SF had flush fitting magazines; I can't stand the pinky pinch from the 10 rounders. Both the 26 & 27 had Pearce +0 baseplates with pinky rest. The extra recoil generated by the 10mm and 40 S&W over 45 and 9mm rounds showed its self in this drill; the 29 and 27 misses were further out of the circle and the overall group measurement including those misses was larger; the 30 and 26 kept any misses very close to the 6" circle. Basically, I shot the 30 and 26 insignificantly faster, but noticeably more accurate for 8 timed pairs (16 rounds) each. I'm not quick at anything and I don't use a timer often (disclaimers), that being said, the average shot times (using full power HP ammunition) were .33 sec for the 30 SF (flush fitting magazine) and .25 sec for the 26 (pinky rest). The main thing I noticed was that the misses with the 30 & 26 only missed that 6" circle by about an inch, would still be a pretty good hit; not so for the other two, they each had a couple of shots land several inches away. I had been packing the 29 and 27 due to their greater power and I knew I was about as quick with them; but, despite the power advantage and near equal speed, accuracy can't be ignored. I'm gonna start carrying the 30 and 26. I'm really not warm & fuzzy about packing a 9mm but it was the fastest & most accurate and took noticeably less effort to keep the front sight on target. Thanks timer???
__________________
Strive to carry the handgun you would want anywhere, everywhere; forget that good area bullcrap. "Wouldn't want to / Nobody volunteer to" get shot by _____ is not indicative of quickly incapacitating. Last edited by CDW4ME; July 12, 2012 at 09:06 AM. |
July 12, 2012, 09:05 AM | #81 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
I had the exact same realization several years ago.
I switched from G23 & G27 to G19 & G26. I felt I would be more "effective" with the 9mm even though the .40 and .45 had more "power".
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
July 12, 2012, 10:43 AM | #82 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
Quote:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publicatio...aspx?ID=202511 https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publicatio...aspx?ID=203152 Some good info on studies done for the Justice department. This is why "proper" training is important.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
||
July 12, 2012, 03:01 PM | #83 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Quote:
Thus, the G26 (extension plate) and an extra mag isn't that much of a hassle.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
July 12, 2012, 04:13 PM | #84 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,247
|
Going on a bike run to the eastern part of the state (Hot) and have decided to carry my Kahr P9, 8 + 1 rounds 9mmHSC and three backup mags, two in the concealed carry vest and one on the belt. I considered the G27 but its just to much, albeit not by much for biking in this weather....in twenty years of such trips never needed a gun, most of the time just extra weight that turned out to be not needed....Still I take it along....
|
July 13, 2012, 08:30 AM | #85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 1,321
|
I can conceal the glock 26/27 with minimal clothing.
Two options: -untucked loose fitting t-shirt and shorts using a Fist kydex clip-on holster appendix IWB -untucked loose fitting t-shirt and gym / sweat shorts using a Smartcarry Unless you are going around shirtless, that ^ is a minimum of clothing. Tucked-in shirts are a major hindrance to my CC and I ONLY reluctantly tuck in my shirt at work, where I can't carry anyway.
__________________
Strive to carry the handgun you would want anywhere, everywhere; forget that good area bullcrap. "Wouldn't want to / Nobody volunteer to" get shot by _____ is not indicative of quickly incapacitating. |
July 15, 2012, 12:09 PM | #86 | |||
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think comparing old police statistics to new ones and contributing the difference to gun changes is extremely flawed. Being a police officer used to be, say a lifestyle. The percentage of officers who were shooters was much higher. As pay and benefits have increased dramatically the last few decades police forces are much more diverse. My local PD has a CPA on it now. Maybe this is just a local trend or a misconception, but I know some of the older/retired officers locally agree. Agree with CDW4me and suggest anyone carrying a higher powered round than 9mm run a similar drill with a convertible gun. I would say that without a doubt the drill has enough value to me that buying a barrel for a friends convertible gun to run the drill then giving it to them would have been worth the experience(I had a Glock 27 myself). I don't own a 45, although I have fired one a few times here and there. Although the recoil is more mathematically it seems much more manageable than 40SW. Some years ago I was taking some martial arts training with a little with edged weapons thrown in. My foreign instructor made a point of making sure that we didn't limit ourselves to the weapon. Make that big slow swing of the sword at someones head and when they lift their arms up to block it put your foot in their rib or such. In the US it seems most have a more one dimensional training such as is found in fencing or boxing. The point here being, maybe you only get the on hit in a non-vital area. Your opponent is weakened and has a very vulnerable wound. Maybe they are crawling away, or maybe they are hit in the leg and you can make a hasty retreat. If not then your 5 shot revolver with a 3% chance of getting 2 hits on both opponents may have at least dropped it from two opponents to one that is injured. The lesson I learned from Lance Thomas is that as often as not, winning is just losing less. Last edited by johnwilliamson062; July 15, 2012 at 12:16 PM. |
|||
July 15, 2012, 02:44 PM | #87 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
Since you have advanced martial arts training and practice whom would you consider to have the advantage in a fight with someone who has taken basic self defense training? What does this mean to you and me? With proper training and a proper mindset you are preparing yourself to win.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
July 15, 2012, 04:49 PM | #88 | ||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
|
Quote:
The point was that taking capacity to an extreme ("huge round count") isn't a solution all by itself. It takes a balance of capacity and skill. Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
||
July 15, 2012, 06:54 PM | #89 | ||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
His buddy may retreat. He probably will, if he sees that as his best chance of escape and survival. But if he needs your car to get away, he may not. If he is already within closing distance with a blade, he may decide that neutralizing you would give him a better chance than running and giving you a chance to shoot him. |
||
August 7, 2012, 05:18 PM | #90 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,424
|
I wish that this tread would become a "Sticky".
It could be used as reference for those who are considering what rounds count their handgun should have. Also, it could be referred to for those considering carrying extra mags or speed loaders.
__________________
NRA Life Member - Orange Gunsite Member - NRA Certified Pistol Instructor "When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society,
they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it." Frederic Bastiat |
August 7, 2012, 05:31 PM | #91 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
|
|
August 7, 2012, 07:41 PM | #92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 199
|
I think a hit rate for the police of 30% is quite good. If you think about it, their context and rules of engagement are quite different than the average CCW holder. It's the job of the police to chase down and apprehend bad guys. Bad guy's will run, shoot, do anything to avoid getting caught. However, once a bad guy runs from a CCW holder, the CCW needs to quit shooting -- the threat is over. The CCW holder will not be following the bad guy with a mission of getting them off the street.
The police face a much harder task than the average CCW holder. The average CCW holder might pull his weapon and catch an aggressor unaware, and a bad guy will never be an easier target than they are at that moment. An aggressor with any brains is going to get the heck out of their and move on to easier pickings. The CCW holders job is done at that point, but that is where the job of law enforcement is just beginning. It is much harder to track down a bad guy and apprehend him than it is to defend one's self against an assailant looking for easy pickings. Of course I have no data or experience to back my view. it's just a slightly different perspective on the original analysis. Thanks to the original poster for giving us all a lot to think about. |
August 8, 2012, 09:27 PM | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,560
|
No shortage of experts here...
The police can not use deadly force to apprehend. Ther greatest majority of police involved shootings are self defense shootings, as are CCW carriers. There's not great difference in police and civilian shootings other than a police officer is more likely to have one. |
August 8, 2012, 10:55 PM | #94 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
|
Quote:
If a TX LEO is:
The LEO can lawfully use deadly force to make the arrest or to prevent an arrestee from escaping. In the simplest terms, if the person in question committed a crime involving deadly force then a TX LEO can use deadly force to apprehend that person if he reasonably believes that there's no other way to make the arrest. SUBCHAPTER E. LAW ENFORCEMENT Sec. 9.51.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
August 9, 2012, 06:26 PM | #95 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,560
|
Ya know what John?... Your absoloutly correct. When the perpetrator pose a life threat to an individual, 0r the public at large a Police Officer may use deadly physical force to apprehend him/her. Like a person carrying a bomb, or one who is on a rampage employing deadly force.
Or a corrections officer or parole officer preventing an escape. So it in the state I hail from... Though I have never seen it used except for a state corrections officer. |
August 9, 2012, 09:54 PM | #96 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
|
Quote:
Frankly, I think from a practical perspective, an officer who shot a criminal fleeing would be in hot water and a civil case would certainly ensue, but as long as the circumstances fit the letter of the law, a criminal conviction would be difficult to obtain.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
August 10, 2012, 05:19 AM | #97 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
The problem with statements like this about when a person, even including a law officer, is allowed to use deadly force, is that typically he probably has seconds to make a decision. They will then be judged by people who weren't there and who have all the time they want to decide whether or not his split-second decision was the right one. This isn't so much a case of what the rules are or whether they are good or not but rather a case of life won't always be fair.
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
August 10, 2012, 10:34 AM | #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
Don't forget that the hit rate for LEO shootings also includes officers who may have been shot and are returning fire after being hit, with the resulting reduction in accuracy.
But that is something that people need to take into account. By definition, a CCW carrier is probably going to be a reactive shooter even more so than a LEO. He/she may have already been shot or under fire by the time they draw their weapon. Situations where CCW holder have their weapons drawn and trained on a target before the "action" starts are going to be few and far between other than home defense. This is another reason that your training regimen should also include firing one handed, weak handed and from the ground if at all possible. This means you need to have a weapon that you can control and that will function for you in these types of situations as well. Two handed Iso/Weaver stances squared up to a stationary single target are not going to be the norm.
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
August 10, 2012, 12:01 PM | #99 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
http://www.policemag.com/Channel/Pat...8-25-2008.aspx
More interesting info inline with data presented here as well as the importance of shot placement to end a fight and firing from unconventional positions.
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
August 11, 2012, 05:05 PM | #100 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Great thread. I'll cast my vote for it being made into a sticky or linked somewhere for future access. Not only does it give a good rational basis for assessing needs for future CHL holders, it also prevents some good rational reasons why magazine capacity bans could end up killing a lot more people than they save.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|