|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 30, 2013, 07:21 AM | #76 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2011
Location: The Woods
Posts: 1,197
|
Quote:
That way there would be no restriction on gun ownership, people would be encouraged to take a safety class, and it would be at least partially funded. Again, it would all depend on how (and by whom) it was implemented, but it does seem like it could work.
__________________
si vis pacem para bellum |
|
January 30, 2013, 02:45 PM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2000
Posts: 1,185
|
The antigun support of "gun training" is in adding a barrier to entry - stop casual browsers being able to buy a gun just because they have $500 (compounding the problem of there being too many people who own guns to ban them). I really don't think they otherwise want the next guy going postal to be faster and more effective, that kind of misses the point.
They oppose training being used in a non-barrier form as it compounds the problem (of guns) by normalizing gun ownership and use (see opposition to "Eddie Eagle" ). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|