|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 25, 2013, 09:37 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2013
Posts: 7
|
Remington 700 .308 (Factory)
Hello shooters,
I am new to this forum so I hope this is the right place to post this. I bought a new Remington 700, .308 with a 20" Tactical Barrel - 1:10 twist. Has a Weaver T-Series 36 power scope on it. The gun shoots terribly at anything other than 100 yards even with hand loads. Factory loads were 167, 168 & 175 gr Lapua, Federal & Black Hills in that order. I measured the case neck OD after firing at ~0.345". This is about ten thousandths more than a loaded factory cartridge neck size OD, (average I measured betwen Federal, Black Hills and Laupua was about 0.335 - 0.338" depending on manufacturer). It is so wide that I can drop a bullet into the fired catrdridge! Never had a .308 before. I am a 6.5mm Creedmoor enthusiast at the moment. I am asking you .308 experts if this is excessive exapansion or is this normal for a factory chamber? BTW, I plan on replacing the barrel with a custom one, but I just wanted to know. My goal is improved accuracy out to 600 yards. I know what does improved mean? OK, 1 MOA at 600? Thanks in advance for any advice / help you guys can provide. |
June 25, 2013, 01:39 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
|
June 25, 2013, 02:26 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 963
|
Yes, Common for a bullet to be dropped in a fired case. Yes, There is room for improvement, Bedding, Free floating and Some polishing of the bore. Ect…
Unless it's a freak on nature, 1 moa @ 600…. Not likely… with a factory barrel.. And Well, You Sir, Have Great expectations or are one hell of a Shooter.. |
June 25, 2013, 02:33 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 755
|
See I am going to have to disagree with TATER. I have an SPS Tactical AAC-SD and it is still MOA or slightly sub MOA at 600 with my hand loads. I have owned two of these and both are great shooters. If you change the barrel, go through the works with lapping and truing it. I have a custom 300WM that was built as a bench rest rifle by one of my close friends, it is better than 1/2 MOA at longer ranges than 600 yards...
__________________
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 25, 2013, 02:58 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
1 MOA is 1 MOA as far as the rifle is concerned - it's the variables introduced by the human frailties of the shooter that makes it a more difficult accomplishment than 1 MOA at, say, 200 yards.
|
June 25, 2013, 03:07 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 963
|
Yes,
But, His designation starts at 600. That would reshuffle the clock.. 1 moa at 600 would translate to .165 min. at a 100.. Would it not? Last edited by TATER; June 25, 2013 at 03:28 PM. Reason: Clarification, |
June 25, 2013, 03:26 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2012
Location: San Joaquin Valley, Calif.
Posts: 482
|
No, MOA is about 1" at 100 yds, 2" at 200 yds, 3" at 300 yds and so on & so on. At 600yds, MOA would be about 6.6"...
Let the "IPC" begin... |
June 25, 2013, 03:44 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 963
|
Ya'll are right, I was assuming the OP was calling for 1" at 600, Otherwise he would have
Said MOA or better.. and left out the 600. Last edited by TATER; June 25, 2013 at 03:58 PM. |
June 25, 2013, 03:55 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
Quote:
Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
|
June 25, 2013, 03:57 PM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2013
Posts: 7
|
Tater,
I know I'll never get 1 MOA with my current barrel. I meant with a custom and having it trued, etc. etc etc. It has a custom stock with aluminum bedding. The guy who sold it to me did that at least and it is free floating. BTW I get sub-MOA at 600 with my Creedmoor. That's easy. I've seen guys with 308's do it all the time. Going with Krieger, 26", 1-10 or 1-11 twist. Have 30" Krieger on my Creedmoor and I love it. Thanks all...... |
June 25, 2013, 04:06 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 963
|
No,No, Forget what I said, I was working from a false presumption. CharlieDeltaJuliet is absolutely right..
I have a buddy that routinely outshoots me with SPS and a Loupold fixed 10X.. |
June 25, 2013, 04:10 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Yeah, 1" at 600 yards would be, well...I don't think there's a shooter on earth who could do that other than by sheer luck.
|
June 25, 2013, 04:42 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
|
Re: Remington 700 .308 (Factory)
|
June 25, 2013, 05:23 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 755
|
Trust me TATER, I see what you thought, that's what I read it as at first. Back to Buskeen, you should be able to get 1 MOA out of the rifle. If it is new and is not shooting 1 MOA, I would call Remington. They might have a look at it and test fire it. Both of the SPS Tactical I have owned (previous and current) shoot about 3/4 MOA from the factory. I will try to get the video camera out with it this weekend and show how it groups. It is a great shooting factory rifle.
__________________
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 25, 2013, 05:36 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,137
|
Quote:
Most factory rifles nowadays are easily capable of MOA shooting. That wasn't the case 30 years ago, but nowadays most of us take a 1-inch rifle as a basic requirement for bolt rifles. Try the rifle before you take the barrel off. It may surprise you. |
|
June 25, 2013, 09:21 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2012
Location: Southern Appalachian Mtns
Posts: 1,520
|
Quote:
Groups do often open up relative to MOA at longer ranges but it is usually due to either wind, the shooter, or the optics.
__________________
DEO VINDICE |
|
June 26, 2013, 02:01 PM | #17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2013
Posts: 7
|
To CharlieDeltaJuliet and PawPaw.
At what distance is that? Nice group PawPaw but no distance shown. I suspect it is 100 yards? Mine will shoot 1 MOA at 100 yards all day; but not at 200 and beyond. Get over 3" groups at 200 yards and 5" groups at 300 yards. Best I can do even on a high $$ Sinclair Bench Rest with all the bells and whistles. I think it is a crappy chamber so it is going in the scrap bin with other factory barrels. I might make a lamp out of it or something. LOL! I bought the gun because I got it with scope, case, McMillan bipod and custom stock, never been shot for $700. Couldn't pass it up,if you know what I mean. |
June 26, 2013, 03:18 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,137
|
Quote:
|
|
June 26, 2013, 03:26 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 755
|
It shouldn't change that much past 200.. That is weird. I would call Remington. They might want to look at it. I don't have pictures of my groups from my .308. But it is still sub MOA at 600 yards. That is as far as I have shot it.
__________________
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 26, 2013, 03:34 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 755
|
Here is a three round group at 100 yards though with my custom 300WM. Customizing the rifle might get you better results but I am still puzzled by he loss of accuracy.
Here is he same rifle at 302 yards(3 shot group) on a steel man sized target. Mind you, this was the builders competition rifle. The center shot is hard to see, the other two bent he metal around it. Close up of it
__________________
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 26, 2013, 03:36 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 755
|
Your rifle should be an MOA rifle. Most are out of the box nowadays.
__________________
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 26, 2013, 03:37 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Traditionaly, one MOA in the USA shooting sports was exactly 1 inch per hundred yards of range. That was based on small bore and high power rifle targets' scoring rings spaced in even inches apart and originated over a hundred years ago
'Twas also based on scope sights with external mounts (Sidle, Lyman, Unertl, El Monte, Fecker, Remington and others) with each click on their 40 tpi screws moving the tube .0002" inch and with the standard 7.2" mount spacing it moved impact exactly one inch at 100 yards. .0002 is 1/3600th of 7.2 inches just like 1 inch is 1/3600th of 100 yards. And metallic rear sights Redfield, Lyman, Gates, Vaver, Warner and others) with their 40 tpi adjustment screws turning 1/3 revolution across 4 clicks moving it .0083333333" which is exactly 1/3600 the distance of the standard 30 inch sight radius of target rifles; 3 MOA per full turn of a knob. Is this so darned hard to use????????? A couple of decades ago, this was no longer toloerated by folks who didn't shoot smallbore or high power matches. They had to have the trigonometric values used because they could not comprehend such a simple way of moving sights and bullet impact. But they had no problems with two standards for miles (nautical versus stature) nor mil standards of which there were 4 different ones on this planet. End of rant. |
June 26, 2013, 03:48 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,137
|
Rant on, Bart.
I tried to explain this very thing to a Tank Gunnery instructor one day and he just about blew a gasket. When we got into minute-of-arc, he really freaked out. Mils is mils, and inches is inches, until they ain't. |
June 26, 2013, 04:05 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 7,097
|
Bart B.
I know true mils (6283 mils), US Military Mils (6400 mils), Soviet Military Mils (6000 mils), and I had to look up the obsolete Swedish Mil (6300 mils). Of course this was all developed for artillery folks and not rifle shooters. Lots of MOA reticle/MOA adjustment scopes are hitting the market now, as many people are intuitively more used to MOA than mil math. Jimro
__________________
Machine guns are awesome until you have to carry one. |
June 26, 2013, 05:01 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Then there's the coaching problems with four or six riflemen on the team and they all don't have the same sight adjustment changes due to sight radiuses as well as lead screw tpi or revolution clicks. One click could be anywhere from 1/6 MOA to 1/2 MOA depending on what's on the gun. With two different ones on the line shooting pairs, when the coach says "One click left" for wind corrections, bullets from both don't make the same change in impact.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|