The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 18, 2013, 04:31 PM   #1
rick bruton
Junior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2013
Posts: 5
m1 garand

im told that you should not shoot modern 30-06 ammo in an m1 garand, anyone have any knowledge regarding this?
rick bruton is offline  
Old March 18, 2013, 04:39 PM   #2
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
M1 garands require cartridges loaded with powder with a specific burn rate. most factory hunting ammo does not have the proper burn rates so the gas pressures can damage the op rod during cycling. most people that hunt with M1s reload for it.

you can buy some M1 match ammo, pull the bullets and replace them with hunting bullets of the same weight.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old March 18, 2013, 04:50 PM   #3
Orlando
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2, 2009
Posts: 352
Use Surplus M2Ball , modern commercial ammo that is specifically made for the M1 Garand (Hornady and Federal both make Garand specific ammo)or install a adjustable gas screw and shoot commercial ammo of your choice
Orlando is offline  
Old March 18, 2013, 11:06 PM   #4
chris in va
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
That's your best route...get an adjustable gas plug that allows the use of commercial ammo. They run about $40.
chris in va is offline  
Old March 19, 2013, 07:20 AM   #5
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
As long as the ammo's loaded with powder with burn rates in the IMR3031 to IMR4320 range, it's just fine. Hundreds of thousands rounds of commercial .30-06 ammo's been fired in Garands over the years. But it's powder met this criteria.
Bart B. is offline  
Old March 19, 2013, 07:58 AM   #6
Fishbed77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
Somewhere there was a list of Garand-safe commercial ammo floating around. I'm pretty sure plain old Remington 150 grain Core Lokt was on that list.
Fishbed77 is offline  
Old March 19, 2013, 08:15 PM   #7
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
4895 powder in the GI load gives about 2,000 psi at the gas port. Slower-burn powders can be higher, putting excessive force on the operating rod--which can bend it.

The adjustable port takes care of this problem, when properly adjusted per the instructions.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old March 19, 2013, 09:06 PM   #8
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
But please note that bending the op rod is the worst thing that can happen and even that has more effect on accuracy than on reliability or safety.

Several years ago, some ammo made for MGs was released by DCM and used in M1 rifles with the result that some op rods were bent.

A four square loony immediately took to the internet to claim that the op rods had broken, and that hundreds of shooters had died with pieces of op rod in their heads. By the time he got done with his silly nonsense, he was claiming that tens of thousands of GI's in Vietnam had been killed by their own M1s,* that there was a big cover-up by the evil Republican administration (George H.W. Bush, IIRC) that the fields of Vietnam were littered with dead bodies with op rods protruding from their foreheads, that he had personally seen thousands of dead (he apparently had never been in the service or in Vietnam), etc., et ridiculous cetera.

*The M1 was little used in VN; it was obsolescent for U.S. troops and the Vietnamese preferred the carbine, which was more suited to their stature.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 20, 2013, 10:22 AM   #9
Superhornet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 292
Mr. Eatman---- I think gas port pressure normally at 6000 + or - 2k for proper operation.
Superhornet is offline  
Old March 20, 2013, 10:35 AM   #10
gdvan01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2006
Location: Home of the first First Lady
Posts: 463
http://www.garandgear.com/index.php?...arand&catid=39
__________________
NRA Endowment Life Member

Proud Son of a former Tomb Guard
gdvan01 is offline  
Old March 20, 2013, 02:41 PM   #11
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Gas port on 30 caliber Garands' is about 10,000 psi inside the barrel. On the 7.62 NATO versions, it's about 7,000 psi; the reason their ports needed opening up a bit. Peak pressure inside the gas cylinder's about 1,000 psi for both rounds.
Bart B. is offline  
Old March 20, 2013, 07:17 PM   #12
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
I've always heard and read 2,000, but I'm not about to argue. The main thing is to avoid the slower-burn powders where the burning curve peaks later in the bore and the pressure is thus higher at the port.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old March 22, 2013, 04:57 AM   #13
radom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2000
Posts: 1,353
You can shoot any factory 06 ammo you want in the things if you dont mind having to pick up the opp rod and stick it back on the gun every other shot. Stick with 147-150 grain slugs and M-2 level loads. IMR 3031 is a good starter load powder to use in them.
radom is offline  
Old March 22, 2013, 11:30 AM   #14
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
that's an interesting assement considering that black tip penetrators are 167 grain and are considered M1 safe...
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old March 22, 2013, 06:16 PM   #15
shep854
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 632
Very interesting...I was recently asking similar questions and was told the bullet weight was the determining factor--don't shoot bullets above 170gr through a Garand.
__________________
Powder smoke- The Smell of FREEDOM!
I don't shoot to kill; I shoot to live.
Registration? NEVER!!
shep854 is offline  
Old March 22, 2013, 11:01 PM   #16
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
Quote:
Very interesting...I was recently asking similar questions and was told the bullet weight was the determining factor--don't shoot bullets above 170gr through a Garand.
also wrong. Hornady lists bullet weights all the way up to 178gr for the M1 specifically. the burn rate of the powder and pressure levels are what determines M1 safe loads or not.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old March 22, 2013, 11:09 PM   #17
shep854
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 632
Thanks, tahuna. The varying quality of information is why I strive to stay with MILSPEC ammo for my Garand, which is essentially a plinker for me.
__________________
Powder smoke- The Smell of FREEDOM!
I don't shoot to kill; I shoot to live.
Registration? NEVER!!
shep854 is offline  
Old March 22, 2013, 11:20 PM   #18
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
there is a lot of misinformation out there about US military arms in general with the M1 bearing the brunt of most of it. many reloading manuals have a short essay for each cartridge and just about every 30-06 section I've read descibes the issues with reloading for the M1 to some detail, while most are brief and do little more than tell you to stick to mid range loads using specific powders, Hornady devoted an entire section to M1 safe loads separate from the standard 30-06 section.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old March 22, 2013, 11:23 PM   #19
shep854
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 632
Absolutely. When I get busy and start reloading, I will definitely stick with the milder side of the reloading charts, for my MILSURP guns.
__________________
Powder smoke- The Smell of FREEDOM!
I don't shoot to kill; I shoot to live.
Registration? NEVER!!
shep854 is offline  
Old March 24, 2013, 10:57 PM   #20
oldgunsmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2013
Posts: 278
180 gr. and heavier bullets have been a no-no in Garands as long as I can remember. There's been a lot written about that over the years.
oldgunsmith is offline  
Old March 25, 2013, 12:25 AM   #21
jimbob86
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
Quote:
That's your best route...get an adjustable gas plug that allows the use of commercial ammo. They run about $40.
A set of dies will set you back 40 bucks or so, too ..... and allow you to make better ammo for less money .......
jimbob86 is offline  
Old March 25, 2013, 10:09 AM   #22
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
Quote:
180 gr. and heavier bullets have been a no-no in Garands as long as I can remember. There's been a lot written about that over the years.
there's also been a lot written over the years that the factor of bent op rods is the pressure at the gas port, slower burning powders or high velocity hunting loads are what causes these. if you use the proper powder and load your casings to allow for the heavier bullet weights without causing too much pressure then it doesn't matter if you're shooting a 150 grain bullet or a 220 grain bullet.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.26218 seconds with 10 queries