The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 28, 2015, 04:13 PM   #1
azselectfire
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2015
Posts: 3
Caldwell ear muffs

Hey guys, I have a set of the howard leight (SP?) ear muffs that have worked out pretty well. I was on slickguns this morning and noticed they had a set of the Cadwell low profile muffs on sale at amazon for $18 and was thinking about grabing a pair. Does anyone have a set of these? Do you like them? Should i give them a try or pay a little more for the howards? Here is a link if anyone is interested http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...XPJRHKWISNKH4P
azselectfire is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 06:00 PM   #2
JWT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
I have a pair. They work fine IMO.
JWT is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 08:27 PM   #3
Strafer Gott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
+1 I have worn mine on the range and in the field. Quite adequate.
Strafer Gott is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 09:00 PM   #4
Savage99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Posts: 567
I wear both ear muffs and ear plugs when shooting centerfire rifles at the range.

The cheek piece lifts one muff some when I aim the rifle.
Savage99 is offline  
Old June 29, 2015, 08:08 AM   #5
cc-hangfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2014
Posts: 304
I bought two identical Caldwell electronic ear protection sets about 18 months ago. One is still working fine, the other no longer suppresses sound spikes (I just use that set as ear muffs, no electronics). Their quality/longevity may not be quite up to Howard's.
cc-hangfire is offline  
Old June 29, 2015, 02:33 PM   #6
dyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,310
Similar experience, had 2 pairs for about 7 years or so. One pair's electronics faded in and out after 1 year. I didn't feel like learning how to re-solder stuff but I bet I could. The other still works fine. I don't rely on them alone, and wear plugs and muffs. Over time I feel like the foam has hardened some as I suspect they do on all earmuffs.
dyl is offline  
Old June 29, 2015, 02:45 PM   #7
NINEX19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 470
I have a pair of electronic muffs and really like them.

On the specific pair that you are referencing, my first impression is having those wires sticking out like that is just an invitation for them to get ripped out of their terminations. I have seen others where they are more hidden and molded into the frame to eliminate snagging. JMHO
NINEX19 is offline  
Old June 29, 2015, 06:28 PM   #8
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,485
The ones you show are only 23 dB NRR, not much unless you wear them over plugs. I'd rather have some 30 dB passives than cheap electronics.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old June 30, 2015, 01:22 AM   #9
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,273
plugs

That's what I do, plugs and elec muffs. Generally, I can hear range commands OK with the volume cranked, but have double ear protection

Here's a question Jim.......what is the NR rating of typical plugs when correctly used? And when combined with muffs, does that yield a direct NR total, ie,

Muffs NR.....23
plugs NR....10 (guess)
TOTAL....... 33?????
bamaranger is offline  
Old June 30, 2015, 08:25 AM   #10
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,485
A good plug - and the cheap disposal foam plugs are very quiet - will be around 30 dB, same as good muffs; although you would likely get bone conduction that muffs block.

The NRRs are not additive. I have seen some figures in the range of 5-8 dB added to the better of the two so a 23 dB muff and a 30 dB plug would give somewhere between 35 and 38 dB of attenuation. But that is a log scale so it is reducing the energy to the ear by well over half.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old June 30, 2015, 08:38 AM   #11
Cheapshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
I have both the earlier model, and the low profile. Both have worked great. The low profile however has a much better on-off/volume controll. The older model was too easy to accidentally turn on, leaving the batteries dead when I wanted to use them. The low profile switch is much more positive. Now the only time the batteries go dead prematurely is when I forget to turn them off....Duh!
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING!
Cheapshooter is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04640 seconds with 8 queries