|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 17, 2013, 05:16 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Surprisingly even-handed Bloomberg article
My dad found this. It was a bit of a shock, coming from a Bloomberg publication. The article actually makes a case of sorts for lawful gun ownership, by looking at numbers of defensive gun uses:
http://www.businessweek.com/articles...n-self-defense The author finds Gary Kleck's estimate of 2 Million defensive gun uses per year to by high, but he finds David Hemenway's estimate of 100,000 per year to be low. (Personally, I find it enlightening that a strident anti-gunner from Harvard concedes 100,000, yet still favors much stronger gun control...) The author opines that 250,000 to 370,000 is probably a more accurate estimate. I wonder if Bloomberg ever reads his own magazines? |
February 17, 2013, 03:07 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Here's a dumb question. I know that Kleck's figure of 2 million DGUs/year includes incidents in which a gun was produced but not fired; I've been poking around the various .gov sites which report National Crime Victimization Survey data, on which Hemenway based his estimate of 100,000 DGUs/year, and I can't for the life of me find any info on how the NCVS defines a "gun use."
Is their definition the same as Kleck's, or does it include only incidents in which a gun was fired? Excuse my ignorance -- someone here must know this...
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
February 17, 2013, 08:49 PM | #3 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
That said, I'm always leery of arguing from the standpoint of gun control as social policy or crime prevention. The rebuttal is always, "well, that's still 11,000 murders! If we can only save one life..."
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
February 17, 2013, 09:03 PM | #4 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
February 18, 2013, 05:39 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Spats, I use similar arguments.
However, a dyed in the wool anti would counter with, "I would not feel safe allowing my child to play at your house, knowing that there are guns there." And Tom, while I understand the potential downsides to a numbers game, I still think it's informative that the antis do NOT have numbers on their side, even if we use their own preferred sources. |
February 18, 2013, 10:18 AM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
February 18, 2013, 06:17 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
We'll see what happens when my boy is old enough to have school friends. (It'll be a while; he is still under development, due date late April.)
But several of his cousins-to-be are military brats. My local friends who have kids are all gun owners. I guess the odds are we will eventually encounter a really gun-shy parent, but those are probably less common around our neck of the woods than they might be, elsewhere. |
February 18, 2013, 07:28 PM | #8 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
February 18, 2013, 08:17 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Probably not; then again, Little Rock did give us the Clintons, and thus the 1994 AWB and the S&W ILS.
For that matter, I live in a farming area a ways north of KC. Gun politics in the city itself are more variable. |
February 18, 2013, 09:23 PM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Yeah, ya got me on that one.
I would also guess that gun-shy parents, while rare in LR, are more common here than in our less populous areas.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
February 18, 2013, 10:48 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Posts: 37
|
We are new to our neighborhood and were a bit worried about our neighbors, who's kids have become our kids best friends. They have 4 girls under 10, and we have 2 girls under 10. The parents are very over protective.
Fast forward 6 months and the dad just got his FOID card to be able to buy a gun, and he wants to go to the range with me! |
|
|