The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 26, 2016, 06:47 PM   #1
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
Do you see a problem?

I was shooting my old Smith & Wesson Military and Police .38 the other day. After the last cylinder full I fired, I couldn't swing the cylinder out. I started taking it apart that evening. Everything seemed okay, just couldn't get the cylinder free. I finally pushed really hard with one hand while rotating the cylinder while I held the latch down as hard as I could. It finally opened up and this is what I found. Sorry for the poor pictures.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2016-08-26-183847.jpg (59.0 KB, 327 views)
File Type: jpg 2016-08-26-183857.jpg (51.5 KB, 295 views)
File Type: jpg 2016-08-26-184724.jpg (58.6 KB, 278 views)
Hdonly is offline  
Old August 26, 2016, 07:14 PM   #2
lee n. field
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 12, 2002
Location: The same state as Mordor.
Posts: 5,568
Looks like a cracked forcing cone. Yeah, that's a problem.
__________________
"As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. "
lee n. field is offline  
Old August 26, 2016, 07:24 PM   #3
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
Yes. It plumb hurt my feelings.
Hdonly is offline  
Old August 26, 2016, 08:15 PM   #4
357 Python
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2007
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 941
How old is this revolver? The reason I ask is that when I worked private security there was fellow that carried a Colt .38 Special that he claimed would fire 357 Magnum rounds. I said no way but later found out I was wrong. There was a time that cylinders for old .38 Specials were drilled straight through. A 357 Magnum could easily be chambered in these old cylinders even though they are not safe to shoot. I imagine that someone did just that, fired a 357 Magnum or more through the cylinder. The cylinder seems strong enough but the forcing cone failed. I don't know if this is the case but it could be one possibility.
357 Python is offline  
Old August 26, 2016, 08:26 PM   #5
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
It was built in the early 1900's. It's a S&W Military and Police. Only had .38 specials in it for the last 25 years since I have owned it. I have read that because of the way they ground the bottom of the barrel flat to clear the cylinder pin when closed, it weakens that part of the forcing cone. Previous owner may have fired +p or hot handloads and cracked it. If cracked, then if finally eroded through and opened up the crack. New barrel time.
Hdonly is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 12:22 AM   #6
gbran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Location: Middle California
Posts: 364
You're a lucky feller.
gbran is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 09:12 AM   #7
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
Found a new 5" barrel for a little over 30 bucks. Present barrel is a 6". From all I have read, it should fit without having to change anything else.
Hdonly is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 09:19 AM   #8
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
Little JB Weld will fix that right up.

__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 09:43 AM   #9
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
Haha. JB the magic glue. JB, some bailing wire and duct tape. If you can't fix it with that, it can't be fixed!
Hdonly is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 11:58 AM   #10
jaguarxk120
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,619
You can get a new M&P 5 inch barrel from Numrich for $35.
jaguarxk120 is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 12:12 PM   #11
bedbugbilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2009
Posts: 3,287
Replace the barrel and keep on shootin'. Barrels are available and it should be an easy switch out for a good pistol smith. You probably are used to the 6" barrel but I love my M&P 5" much better that I like my 6: barrels - can't really say why but my 5" is the first on I grab to go shoot lead downrange. Good luck!
__________________
If a pair of '51 Navies were good enough for Billy Hickok, then a single Navy on my right hip is good enough for me . . . besides . . . I'm probably only half as good as he was anyways. Hiram's Rangers Badge #63
bedbugbilly is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 02:05 PM   #12
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
Ordered a new unused 5" barrel yesterday @ $34.40 + shipping. I like this old Smith too much to stop shooting it. Has the best trigger of anything I own.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PB070095c.resized.JPG (199.3 KB, 83 views)
Hdonly is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 05:25 PM   #13
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,753
Quote:
How old is this revolver? The reason I ask is that when I worked private security there was fellow that carried a Colt .38 Special that he claimed would fire 357 Magnum rounds. I said no way but later found out I was wrong. There was a time that cylinders for old .38 Specials were drilled straight through. A 357 Magnum could easily be chambered in these old cylinders even though they are not safe to shoot. I imagine that someone did just that, fired a 357 Magnum or more through the cylinder. The cylinder seems strong enough but the forcing cone failed. I don't know if this is the case but it could be one possibility.
That really sounds like one of the very early Colts chambered in 38 long colt. IIRC they used a hollow based bullet that would expand to fit the cylinder and bore from an undersized bullet and they were drilled straight through. But shooting 357 through it was a very bad idea.

HDonly is that last picture a picture of your gun with the new barrel installed?
ThomasT is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 06:46 PM   #14
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
No, that's an older picture. I haven't got the new barrel yet. My gun has only had .38 special fire in it for the last 25 years. Can't say what may have been through it before that. I just checked. Mine is not drilled all the way through. .357 will not chamber all the way.
Hdonly is offline  
Old August 27, 2016, 09:02 PM   #15
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
Up to about 1903, the .38 Colt DA had no shoulder in the chamber. They were stated as being chambered for the .38 Long Colt, but in fact were drilled straight through and would accept both the .38 Special and the later .357 Magnum. They would usually take standard .38 Special OK, but .357's would often destroy them. About 1903, Colt caught on and cut shoulders in the chambers to allow use of .38 Special (but not .357), but never changed the markings (though they did change the advertising).

Jim
James K is offline  
Old August 28, 2016, 04:23 PM   #16
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,753
Here is more information on the 38 long colt and it says that the cylinders were bored straight through.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.38_Long_Colt
ThomasT is offline  
Old August 29, 2016, 09:11 PM   #17
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The change to the chambers and barrel was not exactly held secret by Colt, but it was not given a lot of publicity either. A few military users knew, but most were pleasantly surprised to find that the new revolvers (with the revised chambers) shot much better and both accuracy and range scores improved dramatically. I don't have the serial number of the changes handy, but a glance in the chamber(s) will easily reveal the new form.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old September 3, 2016, 07:55 PM   #18
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
Finally got the barrel in. Spending this evening polishing the machine marks out of it. By hand of course. Kit to cut the barrel extension length and forcing cone is pricey. Maybe I can make the tools on my lathe and mill. All it will take is time and some studying. I have never done this before although I have read the instructions that comes with the tools over and over. I am sure I can do it. The question is can I do it right the first time?haha
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2016-09-03-193446.jpg (57.9 KB, 43 views)
Hdonly is offline  
Old September 5, 2016, 12:29 AM   #19
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
Getting closer to having my Smith & Wesson back together. The barrel came out easy. Drove the pin out. Popped the barrel just a little right where the ejector rod locks up on the barrel with a small plastic faced hammer and it came right loose. I really didn't think it would be so easy to loosen up. I had planned on building wooden blocks to lock the barrel and build a wrench and blocks to fit the frame. Not needed. I had read that the older Smith barrels weren't that tight because of the pin. Well, they aren't that tight. When I screwed the new one in and lined it up for the sights, I had between .004" and .005" cylinder gap. Only problem is I still have about a .012" gap between the frame and the boss of the barrel. Not enough to go around again. If I shim the barrel I can make everything come out just right. If I remove the barrel and take the boss down with my lathe, I will have to cut the barrel gap and re-cut the forcing cone. I vote to shim, but maybe I should go over to the Smithy forum and ask some questions.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2016-09-04-155447.jpg (49.9 KB, 42 views)
Hdonly is offline  
Old September 5, 2016, 07:58 AM   #20
old bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Not close enough to the beach
Posts: 1,477
O/P sure looks like a cracked forcing cone. If so it's NO longer safe to shoot. Sorry, model 10's are great all around, use, revolvers.
old bear is offline  
Old September 5, 2016, 09:02 AM   #21
Hdonly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
old bear, I guess you didn't read my last post just before yours?
Hdonly is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09139 seconds with 9 queries