|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 2, 2013, 12:53 AM | #1 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Reflections on the L&CR Forum
We are rapidly approaching the 5 year mark, when this, the Law & Civil Rights forum, opened to the public on TFL. Even though this opening post will be rather long, if you decide to comment, you would be well advised to read this whole post.
OK, so its time for reflection. A little over 6 years ago, life in the old Legal and Political (L&P) forum, here at TFL, got very shrill in the (prolonged) run-up to the 2008 elections. It had gotten so bad, that by the summer of 2008, Dave (TheBluesMan) and I were ejecting folks left and right; The Staff at TFL wouldn't step foot in the L&P. The rancor was spilling over into the other forums at TFL. After some discussion and mutual agreement with the rest of TFL Staff, Dave and I closed that forum. The reasons were many. But a brief explanation of the major problems with the L&P forum were:
All of the moderators, and many of our members, have worked hard to make the L&CR forum the premiere discussion forum at TFL. I think it safe to say that to an extent, we have all succeeded. But that success is trivial if we allow certain destructive influences to continue in the manner it has been of late. At this point, I would invite everyone to review the rules (they have always been stickied towards the top of this forums index) for this subforum, as I have just modified them: L&CR Forum Rules | Read First. If you are new to this forum or haven't bothered to read that post, I urge you to do so now. Your active participation in L&CR is dependent upon you understanding the objectives of our owner and founder (p. 2) and the newly highlighted restrictions. In sum, no more invectives; No more immature behavior; No more Godwin's Law violations. Don't understand these terms? Google them. |
December 2, 2013, 03:54 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
|
After taking some time to read through L&P, I must say I notice a marked difference between where it was at when it shut down and where we're at now. Anything mildly political tends to get out of hand but I like to think our successes are do to strong (yet not heavy-handed) moderator interaction. It also seems the attitude of posters has shifted, in some way, for the better.
When I first got into guns and shooting, I was continually amazed at how nice and singer 98% of gun owners and shooters were. Even the big burly guys you'd see holding an AR-15 on TV as a portrayal of evil just ended up being some of the nicest people I'd met. That really made a difference in accepting the hobby, for myself. It's great that this site has a strong focus on being that 98% and being welcoming, polite people even to those who disagree. Unfortunately, it's the other 2% that stick because they're scary. So we have to make up for that. You can have your mod hat back now, Mr. Norris Just the way I see things.
__________________
Certified Gunsmith (On Hiatus) Certified Armorer - H&K and Glock Among Others You can find my writings at my website, pottsprecision.com. |
December 2, 2013, 08:51 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 433
|
If I added up all the forums I belong to (starting with my very first one "RangerPowerSports"), I wouldn't be surprised to see the number top 100.
After reading tens of thousands of threads and typing at least 20,000 posts all across the internet on topics ranging from tropical fish selection, treehouse construction, tire choice, mustache wax, guns, cars, sports, etc... I can honestly say that the L&CR subforum at TFL has proven more useful to me in everyday life than all of the others combined. The average user (me), certainly doesn't see all the work that goes into keeping it civil (I wasn't around for the L&P), but I know the occasional rant-that-quickly-turns-into-a-closed-thread isn't a bad thing at all. What would be a bad thing though, would be to completely deny or censor that current anti-gun politics is being near wholly driven by a very small group of well funded, powerful, and influential individuals who lean left-of-spectrum. A huge part of their playbook is to try and get us to fight ourselves instead of them... "the best trick the devil ever played..." you know the rest. In other words, it would play directly into "their" hands if TFL would completely sensor discussion of "them"... and I think the mods here do a superior job of allowing just enough "discussion" so we never forget why/who/what we're up against, while simultaneously not turning this place into THE BLAZE. |
December 3, 2013, 01:28 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,295
|
one of the main reasons I joined TFL was to hear different perspectives from gun owners. As an individual in anytown America I know a total of 3 gun owners that are close friends. I guess without the L&CR forum I can go back to years of discussion in the darkness of my limited knowledge base on the subject of what is perhaps the one topic that creates the foundation of keeping our 2A freedom alive. All other things being equal, this is the most important forum topic gun owners can be part of. Some of the things I have learned, or become aware of here in this forum I have been able to articulate in private conversations on my own turf.
Last but not least, the moderation I've seen on this forum IS making a difference in the gun community in America. The very nature of owning and/or carrying a gun means putting your attitude in check and taking the higher road. Its a positive experience here to participate in this forum where the moderation assures the civility.
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
December 3, 2013, 07:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
I've been around about as long as the L&CR forum has been here, and I have to say it is by far the best sub-forum I visit on a regular basis. So, many kudos to the mods.
Also, many thanks to the legal minds around here. I've learned a lot! You guys can take a complex topic and boil it down to a level most people can grasp, without losing the finer points, and I really appreciate that. I have also noticed a slight uptick in political ranting. For the most part, the mods seem to keep it in relative check. If you need to bring the "ban hammer" down a little more often or give people suspensions, so be it. The forum is worth having. |
December 3, 2013, 08:46 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2001
Posts: 1,552
|
Quote:
Sometimes you do need to cull the herd a bit to keep it healthy. A sad truth. I sure wouldn't aim to PO the owner/founder. He who has lawyers, guns AND money, not to mention his TV debating skills... (I understand he can shoot a little too.)
__________________
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington, January 8, 1790, First State of the Union Address |
|
December 5, 2013, 07:32 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Looking forward to stringent enforcement of the rules....
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
December 6, 2013, 04:12 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 1999
Location: Longmont, CO, USA
Posts: 4,530
|
There was a time in L&P when no matter how contentious the subject matter everyone acted as gentlemen and gentleladies. THIS would be a good example. There was no name calling, no disrespect, or invective. Everyone stated their case in a mostly reasonable and respectful manner. It was only when certain vitriolic members showed up and started rabble rousing, acting disrespectfully, and agitating that L&P started the downhill slide.
__________________
Gun Control: The premise that a woman found in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is morally superior to allowing that same woman to defend her life with a firearm. "Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house." - Jules Henri Poincare "Three thousand people died on Sept. 11 because eight pilots were killed" -- former Northwest Airlines pilot Stephen Luckey |
December 6, 2013, 06:04 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Posts: 566
|
I was not around for the L & P forum. I have made a few posts in the current L&CR forum. While it is interesting to read the thread titles and some of the threads in the L&CR forum, it is not a place I feel comfortable speaking my mind. Some of the threads read as if and probably are discussions between attorneys; while such discussions may make for a real page turner in a scholarly journal for attorneys and educators in the legal field, they are less meaningful or worthwhile for the "common man" reader like myself.
As an accounting professional with a MPA and some years of varied experience in different areas of accounting, I can read the research published by accounting professors in such scholarly publications as Journal of Accounting Research or Journal of Accounting and Public Policy and understand what these eggheads are talking about. Honestly though, I would MUCH rather read about the same topic in a magazine for the common practitioner like the Journal of Accountancy that presents much the same information in a more easily read and understood (and even applied) format. The Firing Line does have an excellent Black Powder and Cowboy action section and well-attended Classifieds section that make it far and away worth a daily visit, and the L&CR section is worth a quick stop if for no other reason than to find amusement in the scholarly/practitioner review of legal situations that affect not only legal practitioners and scholars but also their potential clients. Keep up the good work. |
December 6, 2013, 07:56 PM | #10 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Law and Civil Rights is, by its very nature, both common and technical law. So yeah, it may be hard to understand at times.
Orangello, when commenting upon the cases I follow, I do my best to make it as understandable to the common person as I can. After all, I am not an attorney or any kind of legal scholar. What I know (and sometimes it's only what I think I know), is based upon watching court cases (and reading the pleadings) for the last 5 years. Even this is only limited to the developing laws in regards to firearms and our rights. Unfortunately, it's a rather technical field and one must learn the jargon in order to understand. So if I'm ever not clear, please speak up! Quote:
And that is why many of the discussions are so technical. |
|
December 10, 2013, 04:13 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,591
|
Quote:
__________________
- Jon Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation. 9mm vs .45 ACP? The answer is .429 |
|
December 10, 2013, 08:50 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
December 10, 2013, 09:36 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,462
|
Al, I note that your post does not invite comment, but that you've left the thread open posting. If you did not intend to have people comment, please indicate that.
I have found you consistently courteous. Quote:
If you find yourself locked out by a barricade of jargon, a request to explain that jargon should be well received. You may need patience to work through it, and it helps to approach such a matter in two separate steps, 1) understand what is being offered, and only then 2) voice any disagreement you may have with it. Voicing your disagreement while simultaneously getting your hands around a point may frustrate a writer who is earnestly attempting an explanation. If you are belittled for asking or misunderstanding a point, that's a problem, but not yours.
__________________
http://www.npboards.com/index.php |
|
December 10, 2013, 11:32 AM | #14 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Zukiphile, If I had not intended discussion, the thread would have been stickied and closed. Leaving the thread open, invites discussion.
This thread acts as an attitude check, in that what I wrote reflects what we mods are seeing. What the members write, reflects on what they are or have been seeing. While entirely off topic, the threads serves both sides, to ensure that the forum is maintaining the goals as stated in the "Read Me First" sticky (which contains the goals and rules for this forum). |
December 10, 2013, 12:15 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 939
|
I don't post a lot in L&CR, mainly because I have limited knowledge of Laws and the Constitution, at least, limited compared to many of the posters here. Having said that, I have never felt excluded from the conversation here. A lot of conversations are very technical in nature, but that's the nature of the beast. A single word change in a 5 page law can dramatically change the meaning of the law. And when you go from actual laws as they are written, into case law, it gets even more technical.
And example, I had recently posted a question on the commerce clause as it was written, because it seemed that the meaning of it was something different than how it was being used. However, case law shows us that legally it does mean something completely different than how it appears to be written. Having said that, I believe I've gotten more useful information out of this forum than any other. I have a far better understanding of gun laws and their implications than before I started posting/reading TFL. And I had thought I had a good understanding then! I was not here for the old forum, and I truly hope we don't have to resort to closing it because of some bad eggs who can't read the rules. I was originally critical of what I believed was heavy handed moderation on this website. I've posted on dozens of gun forums. Yet, this is the one I keep coming back to, and keep posting on. And I believe that same moderation is part of the reason. It really helps keep the topics on topic, and keeps people accountable for their own actions/posts. So having said that, if we need heavier handed moderation here, then I'm all for it. This, at least for me, is probably the most useful forum here at TFL. It'd be a shame if it went away. |
December 11, 2013, 12:52 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
I"m not a lawyer, and I do grope through the language a bit, but it's an informative forum that has been very productive for me. I hit this sub-forum every time I come to TFL.
I mostly have questions, or to research topics to more effectively debate, or to give the status of local gun issues in my state. Or to point out how gun control marketing happens. I see myself as a representative sample of "the normal TFL" reader who takes the time to research 2a topics in depth. edit to add opinion: personally, i don't see too much disrespect, but i'm not a moderator.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
December 11, 2013, 01:33 PM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
It's a fine balance we keep here. These issues are worth discussing, but politics gets the hackles up.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
|
|