The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 16, 2015, 11:57 AM   #1
Armorer-at-Law
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 465
ATF To Join NYPD In Fighting NYC Gun Crimes

CBS2 Exclusive: ATF To Join NYPD In Fighting New York City Gun Crimes

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2015/06/...atf-gun-crime/

From the article:
Quote:
Those agencies are mounting a first-ever anti-gun initiative in high-crime areas.
(Emphasis mine.)
Quote:
“Of course, when the ATF gets involved with our resources and our tracing expertise, we’ll be able to figure out if weapon is part of an interstate trafficking operation,” Mulham said.
A pretty bold statement from an agency that released hundreds of firearms into the hands of people expected to traffic them to Mexican drug cartels with no plan to "track" them, only to trace them when they show up at crime scene.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns, and money...
Armorer-at-Law.com
07FFL/02SOT
Armorer-at-Law is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 12:01 PM   #2
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,236
Guns are strictly controlled there

Should be a gravy job

Wink wink jab jab
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 12:16 PM   #3
csmsss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
ATF fighting gun crimes or gun OWNERS? Past experiences would suggest the latter.
csmsss is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 12:39 PM   #4
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Quote:
“Of course, when the ATF gets involved with our resources and our tracing expertise, we’ll be able to figure out if weapon is part of an interstate trafficking operation,” Mulham said.
In other words, let's blame all the guns traced to out-of-state sources and blame those states for our problems. Michael Bloomberg mined that strategy quite well, going so far as to set up highly illegal stings at gun dealers in Georgia and South Carolina.

Quote:
And when the feds get involved, Mulham warned, “In many cases, the punishment is more severe.”
On the prosecution side, it would be nice if they got involved now and then. I'm all for punishing those who use guns to commit criminal acts. The problem is, the gun charges are frequently dropped as part of a plea package.

Quote:
“They can be people with non-violent backgrounds, but have a felony nonetheless, and now arrested with a weapon.”
Newsflash: they don't need the federal government for that. Most states have their own laws to prosecute felons in possession of firearms.

I don't know. This whole thing smells like a publicity stunt and little more.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 03:21 PM   #5
357 Python
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2007
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 941
With their efforts in "Fast and Furious" and the death of a Border Patrol Agent the BATFE should arrest itself.
357 Python is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 03:40 PM   #6
ronl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Posts: 1,100
Stupid is as stupid does. I just have to shake my head sometimes. I guess it's more of Bloomberg's obsessive-compulsive reaction to the private ownership of guns. Like most every "crime" initiative they propose, it probably has very little to do with real crime on the street. I'd like to see how much impact it has and get the real numbers from someone, not NYPD or ATF. Another waste of taxpayer money. NYC went to the dark side many years ago, they get what they deserve.
ronl is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 04:26 PM   #7
Tinbucket
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2015
Posts: 355
ATF to Join NYPD in Fighting NYC Gun crimes

What possible new could they do?
They can go about harassing the few permitted Owners and recending permits and seizing their guns.
How is it the Federal Government's perview to go after anyone owning, possessing or bearing a firearm?
Our Government ought to be going after NYC for denying Citizens their Rights.
Are they going to pick up Bloomber's program of sending Agents, undercover to deceive and make false statements to buy firearms in other states?
There should be some warrants ,in Tn, Va etc for Bloomberg and his agents for buying firearms, with false identities and lying on BATFE forms, several years ago.
The only ones they could go after is ones that own firearms.
They are not going to stop traffic, invade homes, and stop pedestrians and conduct a 100% accountabilty search like Maryland did on the Interstate?
Maybe they will do a rewards for tip line?
Tinbucket is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 06:39 PM   #8
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Quote:
They can go about harassing the few permitted Owners and recending permits and seizing their guns.
Given that the state maintains a registry of pistols and "assault rifles," it's possible the ATF would jump at the chance to do some picking over that list.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 06:51 PM   #9
csmsss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
Quote:
Given that the state maintains a registry of pistols and "assault rifles," it's possible the ATF would jump at the chance to do some picking over that list.
Can there be any doubt that they are already in possession of it and have been since its inception?
csmsss is offline  
Old June 16, 2015, 10:06 PM   #10
bandaid1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 116
Tom: "Given that the state maintains a registry of pistols and "assault rifles," it's possible the ATF would jump at the chance to do some picking over that list"

This was on the same line of thought I had. However, recently NY was told to hand over the numbers for how many "Semi Auto Rifles" people registered and the number is probable low. Maybe they are bringing in the AFT to go after those that did not register. With the ability to access licensed dealers records (throughout the USA) that might be their intention.
bandaid1 is offline  
Old June 17, 2015, 10:54 AM   #11
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
Wasn't it the case that the Feds couldn't keep registrations of firearms. Thus, would having a copy of a state's list be banned from the Feds?
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old June 17, 2015, 12:41 PM   #12
csmsss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
Quote:
Wasn't it the case that the Feds couldn't keep registrations of firearms. Thus, would having a copy of a state's list be banned from the Feds?
Because they've been so trustworthy and respectful of faithfully honoring the constraints they're supposed to operate under? Hahaha.

Actually, they're prevented from creating their own registry. I'm pretty sure the law is silent on them reading databases created by other agencies. And all that would need to be provided to the feebs is a user account with access to the data. I have no doubt a few bright BATF database developers have developed any manner of relational queries that allows them to combine SAFE databases with existing ATF records.

Last edited by csmsss; June 17, 2015 at 12:58 PM.
csmsss is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08467 seconds with 10 queries