|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 27, 2012, 03:40 PM | #76 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Quote:
As it stands, Judge Stegner agreed with Tribble's argument and disallowed all monetary claims from the University of Idaho. That's a big win for Aaron. |
|
January 28, 2012, 12:55 PM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
|
Wow, that is a big win. Hope his appeal works too. Aaron is going to be a good gun rights lawyer don't you think?
|
February 2, 2012, 11:20 AM | #78 |
Member
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Location: Florida, near the mouse
Posts: 76
|
Oops!
Why was I thinking this was in Federal court? Thanks for catching my error. So, I hope that the Idaho Supreme Court can right this wrong.
__________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. ~ Groucho Marx |
March 13, 2012, 02:53 PM | #79 |
Member
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Location: Florida, near the mouse
Posts: 76
|
Any Update?
I'm curious if the parties were ordered to appellate court mediation? Has an Initial Brief been filed yet?
__________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. ~ Groucho Marx |
July 16, 2012, 07:59 PM | #80 | ||
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Plaintiff/Appellant Arron Tribble filed his opening brief today at the Idaho Supreme Court.
A look at the TOC is instructive of what Aaron is claiming: Quote:
Quote:
The Regents will respond on or about the 15th of August (Idaho uses the same briefing schedule as the Federal Courts, at this level), barring a motion to extend time to file. Last edited by Al Norris; July 16, 2012 at 08:09 PM. Reason: clarification |
||
July 16, 2012, 10:19 PM | #81 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
Yeah, it seems pretty clear cut, in light of Heller and McDonald. Self-defense in the home has been explicitly protected.
|
July 16, 2012, 11:47 PM | #82 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
|
under "in re Brickley" (1902) the Idaho State Supreme Court has already ruled that a local government cannot ban possession.
|
August 11, 2012, 01:48 PM | #83 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Tribble gets a boost!
I seem to be falling behind. sigh.
Back on July 19th, the NRA filed a Motion to file an amicus brief and a Motion to participate in the orals. The amicus brief was attached to the motion as appendix A. The file has been uploaded to Google Docs and is here. It's a scanned copy and is 12MB in size, so it cannot be uploaded to the site. You can read the brief there or download a copy for your own reference from Google Docs. In its introductory statements, the NRA opines: Quote:
Earlier, in this thread, I posted what I thought were the errors of the district Judge. Although Aaron covered some of those errors, the NRA covers many of the rest. Including that the Idaho Supreme Court need not reach to the Federal question, but merely find in favor of Mr. Tribble on Idaho Constitutional grounds alone. This because Article I, section 11 provides more protections than does the Federal Constitution. |
|
August 11, 2012, 10:59 PM | #84 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2012
Location: Kitsap County, WA, USA
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
|
|
December 22, 2013, 12:38 PM | #85 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
This is a long overdue update.
Way back in Sept. of 2012, Mr. Tribble moved out of Campus Housing, thus mooting the case. No word was ever received from Mr. Tribble about this and his FB pages were taken down. I have tried for the better part of a year to contact Mr. Tribble. All attempts at communication have been refused. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|