The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 2, 2015, 04:42 AM   #26
mag1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Posts: 140
"Of course many firearms registration systems did not record the suffix letter on Lugers (hard to read anyway, in many cases) so there was the possibility of repeats every 9999 units "

A friend had this happen. He sold a Luger at a show and some time later got a visit from the police. Seems the buyer showed the Luger to a friend who claimed that was his Luger stolen years before and still had the police report with the serial but just the numbers.

My friend explained the repeating serial number situation to the police and since the report didn't list the maker or complete serial the matter was dropped.

I've also read that way back (maybe 20s, 30s?) when Colt duplicated serial numbers they'd sell those firearms overseas.
mag1911 is offline  
Old August 2, 2015, 08:10 PM   #27
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,813
Quote:
Interesting, correct me I'm wrong, but isn't there some federal reg somewhere that indicates semi-autos have to have serial numbers stamped or otherwise permanently attached to different parts of the gun?
I recall a proposed law that included pistols having a "hidden" serial number, somewhere not commonly visible, but I don't believe that passed.

I do recall hearing of a fellow who had some trouble with the police over "duplicate" serial numbers. He had a S&W .38SPL, and the police had a record of a S&W .38 cal, ser#xxxxxx as stolen. The numbers were the same. It was the police records that were incomplete, listing only the maker, caliber and #. When deeper investigation revealed that they were two different models of gun it was resolved, but it took an investigation, because of the sloppy manner the police used to record the information.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old August 2, 2015, 09:12 PM   #28
rtpzwms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: OTS
Posts: 1,035
Quote:
So when you see a listing on a match set of firearms and it reads; Matching Serial numbers, what they really mean, is Consecutive serial numbers.
I'm not sure how he did it but.... I ran into a gentleman at one of the local gun shows. He was selling 4 Matching Serial Numbered guns. All from the same manufacturer and I was interested in the pistols. He explained that they were all ordered on the same day as a special order. And that he had expressly asked for the serial number be the same. If I remember correctly it was initials and birthday. I saw this just back in January of this year.
__________________
Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want.
rtpzwms is offline  
Old August 3, 2015, 11:06 AM   #29
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,813
The same make & model gun cannot have matching serial numbers. When someone says "matching" in this context they mean consecutive.

HOWEVER, different model guns CAN have the same (matching) serial numbers. I once saw a cased set of a baby Browning, a .380, and a Hi Power, all with the same serial #.

(don't know if it came from Browning that way, or if a very serious collector created it), but I did see it.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old August 4, 2015, 09:08 PM   #30
ronl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Posts: 1,100
I do know that during WW2 there were serial number overlaps in both Garand and 1911A1 production. Both the Garand and the Colt 1911A1 I own are in that category. Winchester and SA produced Garands with identical serial numbers, as did Colt and Remington Rand. Would be something to own two different Garands or 1911A1's with the same serial number, different makers.
ronl is offline  
Old August 4, 2015, 11:30 PM   #31
rtpzwms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: OTS
Posts: 1,035
44 amp:
Quote:
When someone says "matching" in this context they mean consecutive.
in what I personally saw they were NOT consecutive they WERE MATCHING. I found it very odd myself if I had not seen it myself, I too would have been skeptical.
__________________
Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want.
rtpzwms is offline  
Old August 5, 2015, 12:20 AM   #32
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
If that is the case then they would have had to be different models, or perhaps the serial numbers on each gun had a different prefix or suffix added to differentiate them. Since 1968 it has not been legal for a manufacturer to put the same serial number on two different guns of the same model.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old August 6, 2015, 10:10 AM   #33
SaxonPig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Posts: 1,900
I think it's already noted...but...

The GCA of 1968 mandates unique serial numbers on all guns. No dupes allowed under federal law. This is why S&W changed from the S prefix on N frame models to an N in 1968. They had used the S prefix on K frames in the late 1940s so it would be possible to have two S&Ws made 20 years apart with the same serial if they didn't change.

Before this law serial numbers were not required and many inexpensive guns didn't have them. I have owned several 22 rifles made long ago with no serials. In the "bound book" these are listed as "N/A" where the serial goes.

If a gun was stamped with a number, it is illegal to remove or deface it even if the gun was made before the law required a serial. Some people think a gun with a removed serial is OK if made before 1968...not so.
SaxonPig is offline  
Old August 8, 2015, 02:42 PM   #34
KEYBEAR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,059
At one time I bought and sold High end Trap Guns . I had two of the same make one was number 4 and one was number FOUR . This was about 10 years ago .
KEYBEAR is offline  
Old August 8, 2015, 04:17 PM   #35
longknife12
Member
 
Join Date: March 13, 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 95
About 40 years ago...or so......I was contacted by a fed agency reference a Colt Det Special I had purchased less tax. That number and about 2 tons of weed had been picked up off coast. After a lengthy conversation, agent admitted they had 3 pistols with same SN. 2 went to Govt and 1 to me... I had sold mine to a narc.. Guess
I was convincing.......never heard any more!!!
Dan
longknife12 is offline  
Old August 9, 2015, 07:18 AM   #36
SaxonPig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Posts: 1,900
They had 3 pistols with same SN? The odds say that didn't happen. Something else was going on.
SaxonPig is offline  
Old August 9, 2015, 07:30 PM   #37
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
I think the name appeared only on the barrel and there were a number of other models that differed in only minor details That means it would be possible to "change the model" by installing a different barrel. As you say, it wouldn't be terribly likely for there to be a triplication, but it could happen.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07049 seconds with 10 queries