|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 22, 2013, 05:00 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2009
Posts: 313
|
Washington State I-594 is Firearm Registration
Petitioners began hanging out at my local grocery stores and were attempting to get people to sign. I decided to download and read the document that is being proposed and I am EXTREMELY upset at the legislation this is shaping up to be. This video is my partial analysis of the language of the initiative and I encourage you all to read it and please share the video with your friends and lets spread the awareness about this dangerous initiative.
VIDEO LINK
__________________
Please visit my YouTube page at: www.youtube.com/user/savage1r |
July 22, 2013, 05:03 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Savage, please post a link to the document, so we can read it for ourselves.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
July 22, 2013, 05:07 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2009
Posts: 313
|
__________________
Please visit my YouTube page at: www.youtube.com/user/savage1r |
July 22, 2013, 08:39 PM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
Well the first part is really just a copy and paste of Manchin-Toomey.
Quote:
It appears to establish a state BG Check system. Yippie lets waste money doubling down on the same check. Quote:
|
||
July 23, 2013, 11:55 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2009
Posts: 313
|
Yeah. It's just a big mess all around. I'd rather we drum up public support to bury it so it never sees the light of day.
__________________
Please visit my YouTube page at: www.youtube.com/user/savage1r |
July 23, 2013, 12:15 PM | #6 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,802
|
I went to the Walmart the other day, and there was the petition, actually there were two, one on each side of the board. One was about not allowing the govt to seize guns in the event of a disaster. The other was about requiring a background check for all transfers.
After reading both (and the kid with the petition board was only telling people about the seizure one..) I found both contained unacceptable language, and declined to sign either. The one looks like a good idea, but the specific language they wrote into it contains some very bad stuff, potentially...I could not support it as written, and neither (IMNSHO) should anyone else. The other one was basically a state version of the failed Federal background check law, which we neither want nor need. If these make it to the ballot, when the form comes in the mail (they don't let us go to the polls anymore - with a couple of exceptions), I urge all WA voters to vote them both down. A bad law is a bad law. And a bad law with a good sounding title is still a bad law.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|