The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 1, 2014, 10:15 AM   #26
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,606
Holder as a Supreme Court Justice? One never knows in politics, but I find it hard to believe that someone who was forced to resign as Attorney General because he was in contempt of Congress would be confirmed by the Senate.
natman is offline  
Old October 23, 2014, 05:03 PM   #27
pnac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Posts: 550
Obama Asserts Fast and Furious Executive Privilege Claim for Holder’s Wife

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/20...olders-wife-2/
__________________
In my hour of darkness
In my time of need
Oh Lord grant me vision
Oh Lord grant me speed - Gram Parsons

Last edited by Evan Thomas; October 23, 2014 at 05:41 PM. Reason: removed conspiracist comment.
pnac is offline  
Old October 24, 2014, 08:36 AM   #28
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
Why? Neither the wife nor mother has any official standing or position?
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old October 24, 2014, 08:49 AM   #29
KyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
Quote:
Why? Neither the wife nor mother has any official standing or position?
Just guessing but IIRC at least one former president has asserted executive privilege for a non-employee advisor to the president. Suppose for example, one wanted outside advice on foreign affairs and consulted a former secretary of state. That may or may not be a legitimate and valid use of executive privilege. I don't know. However, I seriously doubt President Obama is seeking advice on the ATF's gun-running from Eric Holder's wife. It's laughable.
KyJim is offline  
Old October 24, 2014, 11:50 AM   #30
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
Quote:
Why? Neither the wife nor mother has any official standing or position?
Why claim executive privilege for non-governmental employees or the spouse/family members of governmental employees? The only reason I can see it that they know something the executive branch does not wish publically disclosed.

I leave it to you (and Congressional investigators) to determine just what they might know that the Executive Branch doesn't want us to know...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is online now  
Old October 24, 2014, 04:04 PM   #31
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
A bit like "Taking the 5th" then.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old October 26, 2014, 09:23 AM   #32
barnbwt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
I suspect the emails to mama contain no state secrets, but rather shed an embarassing light on the internal crassness of the AG office. Just like how the non incriminating Nixon tapes revealed he swore like a sailor constantly behind closed doors (Blago's wiretaps showed that, too). Since executive priveledge now covers anything embarassing (or incriminating), that's why mama and wifey are covered

Time for a second select committe, methinks...

TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things."
-- Alex Rosewater
barnbwt is offline  
Old October 26, 2014, 12:41 PM   #33
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
What I'm curious about are the "talking point" emails that go back to February 2011. Remember that Holder told Congress he was unaware of Fast & Furious until "a few weeks" before his testimony in May 2011.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old October 26, 2014, 01:18 PM   #34
DUB
Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 43
fool

If people think you are an absolute fool,just take your toys and go home!!!
DUB is offline  
Old November 4, 2014, 06:26 PM   #35
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
In an "election eve dump," the DOJ has released 64,280 pages of the requested documents.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old November 4, 2014, 06:57 PM   #36
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
I can't help but wonder how many "Magnum 44 sharpies" died in the redaction process.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old November 4, 2014, 09:49 PM   #37
ThesNazud
Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2013
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by wogpotter
I can't help but wonder how many "Magnum 44 sharpies" died in the redaction process.
Lol, I can just imagine the writers cramp involved...
ThesNazud is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06740 seconds with 8 queries