The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 26, 2012, 02:56 AM   #1
Nero45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2008
Posts: 265
Custom Handgun just as bad as Handloads for protection?

Ok, from what I've heard/read using handloads for personal protection is a big no no. I'm not going to name names of who has said/wrote this suffice to say I'm not going to try it and find out. However, I got to thinking could that also apply to custom handguns? By custom I'm not talking a title of a model i.e. Kimber Custom II, I mean Caspian or Lone Wolf something that was build out of parts to make a full gun. My thoughts is a prosecutor might try to convince the jury that I, the owner, made or had this gun made with the sole intention of killing the person that was intending to kill me that I most likely never knew before hand. Could this be a possibility or am I just getting worked up for nothing? Thank you.
__________________
Nero45
Revolvers are a disease. Once you buy one your doomed for life!
Within temptation are our lives on this earth until we leave -me
Nero45 is offline  
Old April 26, 2012, 05:03 AM   #2
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,823
IMO, No custom hand loads. Don't give the prosecuting atty or plaintiff's atty (civil suit) anything to use against you.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old April 26, 2012, 06:11 AM   #3
sheepman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2007
Location: Moses Lake WA
Posts: 395
When I do carry it is a box stock gun with factory ammo.
__________________
The best gun is the one you have when you really need one
sheepman is offline  
Old April 26, 2012, 09:02 AM   #4
chewie146
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853
I wouldn't think so. In my opinion, if you are 100% in the right, it shouldn't matter how you defend yourself. However, there are lawyers of all kinds. I believe half of the problems in this country are caused by lawyers. The other half is caused by attorneys.
chewie146 is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 01:22 AM   #5
dajowi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Posts: 1,196
A couple of years ago I went to a workshop presented by the the county district attorney, a prosecuting and defense attorney and several police officers.

The question came up regarding hand loads and self defense. They were pretty clear that it makes no difference contrary to what you see in movies.

They all were in agreement as to what you need to do after a shooting:

1. Keep your mouth shut. The one thing that does send people, (even innocent people) to jail or prison is that they talked without the presence of an attorney.

2. The police just want to finish the paperwork. They will tell you anything in order to do that - even lie.
dajowi is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 01:39 AM   #6
Lost Sheep
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 3,341
Basis in theory, but not borne out in facts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nero45
Ok, from what I've heard/read using handloads for personal protection is a big no no.
In Criminal cases, to even get near the question of "Did the shooter use handloads and what does that say about his state of mind or intentions?" you have to get past the question of "Was deadly force justified or not?"

If deadly force was justified, the question of what the bullet was is generally not a factor. There just isn't any case law to speak of.

That said, I have factory loads for self defense. I don't want to be the case that gets to be the test case.

Now, in a civil case where the AMOUNT of bodily harm to someone who survives a shooting might be an issue, THERE is something (in my opinion) to be worried about. But not that much. Again, case law just isn't there. But individual juries assessing an amount of damage can do strange things.

Rather than what a custom gun says about me, I would be more worried about the skull and crossbones scrimshawed on my grips and the phrase "Widowmaker" engraved on the left side of my barrel and "Kill 'em all and let God sort'em out" on the right, the swastika on my forehead and the devil horns tatooed above my ears.

OK, I got carried away just a little on that last paragraph.

Bottom line is, a justifiable use of force is justifiable. Anything else is just nuance compared to that first threshold.

Lost Sheep
Lost Sheep is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 01:58 AM   #7
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
Is it just me or did everyone miss the OPs actual topic? Custom handguns not handloads.

I have wondered the same thing myself. I hear all the time about the ammo, but why is the same not true for the gun. Sya you improve the trigger pull on it, isn't it just as feasible for a attorney to talk about how the gun was altered to INCREASE IT"S KILLING POWER or if you remove the loaded chamber indicator are you not altering the gun TO MAKE IT MORE DEADLY (in the lawyers eyes
__________________
Find out just how tall I am
By jumping in the middle of a river
TennJed is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 06:10 AM   #8
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
The keyword in most responses is LAWYER.
In reality, there should not be any difficulty with carrying/using a firearm that you are comfortable and skilled with. As it stands, the dog poop lawyers and court system will go to any length to make a dollar off any situation good/bad, right/wrong that they can devise.
I carry a stock pistol with factory made ammo as a concession to the disgusting legal processes that may follow use of this equipment.
Mobuck is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 06:30 AM   #9
baccusboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 2011
Posts: 147
My .45 is over $1,200, and I honestly am beginning to question if it's a wise idea to carry a gun more expensive than a Glock or M&P for self-defense if I might lose it to the police.
baccusboy is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 06:52 AM   #10
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
A lawyer will bring up anything he can think of !!! How about 'it was the full moon !
A good shoot is a good shoot and those facts will win the case .

First get good training , you'll be much less likely to screw up.
Second get a very good criminal defense lawyer -- NOT your family lawyer !
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 07:27 AM   #11
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
Quote:
Bottom line is, a justifiable use of force is justifiable. Anything else is just nuance compared to that first threshold.
That could depend on locality and the proclivities of a DA. I live in a state where your statement would likely apply, but I wouldn't take my chances in a place like New Jersey or Maryland.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 02:51 PM   #12
Archie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 26, 2000
Location: Hastings, Nebrasksa - the Hear
Posts: 2,209
View from an old guy who watches

Criminal Charges:
The standards for a proper self-defense shoot is pretty simple: "Would a reasonable person in the same circumstance believe the assailant presented a threat of death or great bodily harm?"

The exact wording is probably different from place to place, but that's the gist of it nearly everywhere. There may be some jurisdictions that demand 'retreat', but those are local and must be dealt with individually.

Notwithstanding political pressures - like those currently going on in Florida - prosecutors generally have enough to do without seeking out flimsy cases to prosecute. (There can be exceptions, no guarantees in life.)

So, essentially, be careful, observe all the laws involved, and follow a 'reasonable' course of action. (Which is another whole discussion I won't address now.)

Civil Charges:
This is the tricky part. No matter what the circumstances of the event, some of the 'survivors' of the late lamented will sue for 'wrongful death', 'deprivation of company', pain, suffering, and possibly frostbite if they can find a sleazy enough attorney.

The arguments about 'special ammunition' and 'special weapons' may be used - typically in lieu of facts - by the plaintiff attorney. It is only successful if the jury is gullible enough to believe such claptrap.

One attorney attempted to argue - in a wrongful death suit - the respondent (the man who successfully defended himself from deadly force) had accidentally shot the late lamented; and was therefore guilty of negligence. The respondent offered the argument of reasonable defense to a deadly threat and no 'accident' was involved.

I confess I do not remember how the verdict went. I'm thinking the respondent prevailed; the jury believed no accident had occurred. However, it depends on how the jury 'feels' about the evidence and arguments presented.

Of course, the respondent still had the expenses of defending himself. A counter suit was pointless, the 'plaintiff' didn't have enough money to pay attention and the ambulance chaser who represented the plaintiff was irresponsible. Or perhaps just not responsible for the costs involved.

All of this points up the need for serious tort reform rather than concern over ammunition or custom made firearms.
__________________
There ain't no free lunch, except Jesus.
Archie

Check out updated journal at http://oldmanmontgomery.wordpress.com/
Archie is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 05:40 PM   #13
BigJimP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
I choose to carry a custom made 1911 in .45 acp ...and I have no reservations about it .../ if it gets confiscated, then it does...

What will matter most ...is the situation ..and your actions ( if you ever have to use the gun ) ...

who made it / or whether you custom ordered it / custom triggers, etc - is way down the list...but yes, it might be a factor....all the more reason to think this stuff thru before you decide to carry a weapon ( and the civil issues as well as the criminal issues ) ...but strictly speaking a custom gun vs a stock gun ...will make very little difference in my opinion.
BigJimP is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 05:48 PM   #14
glynnm45
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2008
Posts: 4
A+++ for CHEWIE146'S comments. Ever wonder why a HUGE percentage of members of the Legislature/body politic are of that persuasion?
glynnm45 is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 08:11 PM   #15
ClydeFrog
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
Custom modifications, defense-carry rounds....

To answer the member post, no: I don't think a custom or customized handgun will raise red flags or create serious legal problems, IF the owner uses common sense & good judgement.
Some gunsmith work or custom features like to remove the trigger guard or a magazine safety(on a Hi-Power semi auto) or to tape down a 1911a1 grip safety wouldn't be smart in 2012.
If you have a top pistolsmith do the service work or do things that enhance the firearm's safety(like a DA only action) could be defended in open court.

As posted, I agree that using handloaded or reloaded ammunition is not a smart idea for protection/carry guns.
I don't know what "movies" the TFL member is bringing up but I could see lawyers or the media using the ammunition as a motive or sign. True or not, that is the legal & law enforcement system today.

An example would be the Harold Fish(AZ vs Fish) case. The jurors were told by "legal experts" how Fish used Federal Hydra-Shoks & a single action 10mm; neither of which were in use by any sworn LE agency in the US at the time.
ClydeFrog is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 09:46 PM   #16
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,433
The fact is this: anytime you are forced to use a gun to defend yourself there is a chance of legal problems and any choice of guns and/or ammunition could conceivably be used to portray you in a negative light.

Where the real issue lies is at what point does the legal risk outweigh the benefits of a particular gun/ammo choice. For me, personally, handloads have too high a risk/benefit ratio in most cases given the current quality of premium factory ammo. Likewise, there are very few guns which I'd feel the need to modify beyond a set of aftermarket grips before relying on them for self-defense.

That being said, if you feel that a Wilson Combat, Ed Brown, or Les Baer is the best tool with which to defend your life, get the appropriate model and carry it. Likewise, I wouldn't worry too much about a gun that's been accurized, had the trigger smoothed (though not lightened significantly), dehorned, or had a different set of sights installed is likely to be problematic. However, I don't really think that a 1lb trigger, grips with a skull and crossbones, or engraving that reads "goblin smoker" or some such nonsense is a particularly wise idea.
Webleymkv is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 10:41 PM   #17
jfrey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Location: Coastal South Texas
Posts: 557
Like baccusboy, I had the same concerns about carrying an expensive pistol in the very unforunate case I ever had to use it to protect myself or family. Now I shoot my high priced stuff at the range and bought a G19 for carry. Glocks aren't as appealing as one of my high end 1911's but I can get several Glocks for the same price. Everyone has heard of Glocks, but some greedy lawyer could make a senseless case about a pistol made by some manufacturer few people have ever heard of. It's possible even the incenuation could do harm in some jurors uneducated mind. Just my thoughts.
jfrey is offline  
Old April 27, 2012, 11:00 PM   #18
Jeff #111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 25, 2001
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,072
Just get a good, dependable handgun that is common and can be easily replaced. One that you have no sentimental attachment to. I am a cop and we will confiscate the weapon even in a clear cut case of self-defense and you can bet we will confiscate it if there is either a death or injury. It's evidence.

Once the case is investigated (and we will investigate because gosh people lie to the cops. Can you believe that?) and if the prosecutor decides not to press charges or the prosecutor does take it to court and you are found not guilty by a jury you will get your weapon returned. But that might be awhile.Meanwhile the badguy that you might of put down might have friends who want payback. It's possible. So your Glock or Ruger is sitting in the evidence locker. YOu can go get yourself another Glock. And your $12,000 dollar Super Duper Plantinum Combat Custom Tackdriver is still in your safe.

Also just go with modern, high quality factory produced "self-defense" ammo that is made by a well known and reputable company like Federal or Winchester or Hornady or Remington or Black Hills or Corbon or so on and so forth. Why? Because it's made by a reputable company with (hopefully) a good record for dependable ammo.

We're talking something that is meant to be used in a real life and death type of situation. Why play around with custom loads? Unless you're Elmer Keith most of us don't have the type of resources necessary to really test a new design of bullet. The ammo companies do. As a police officer I carry Federal's HST. I don't feel undergunned.

As far as law suits go. Well anybody can be sued by anybody else. It's a reality. That Sword hangs over my head everytime I put on my uniform and go to work. It sucks, but hey it's America.

Last edited by Jeff #111; April 27, 2012 at 11:10 PM.
Jeff #111 is offline  
Old April 28, 2012, 03:46 AM   #19
AZAK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
Quote:
My .45 is over $1,200, and I honestly am beginning to question if it's a wise idea to carry a gun more expensive than a Glock or M&P for self-defense if I might lose it to the police.
If, God forbid, I ever have to use any firearm to defend myself to the point that the police are collecting it as evidence, the last thing that I am going to be thinking about is how my "nice pistol" is rusting away in an evidence locker. Not to mention that $1,200 is not even a down payment on the "vacation tab" that you will be footing for the services of a good attorney.

In my opinion, life is to short to compromise on a firearm. I carry what I shoot well and enjoy carrying. From Ruger to Wilson Combat and in-between.

The odds are that I will never need to use one in a defensive role; however, if I ever do need to, I want one that I know works very well in my hands. I have carried factory loads and reloads, have carried stock and customized guns.

And having sat on several juries, one just never knows what any particular juror is going to "attach" themselves to issue wise. Nor does one really have a clue as to any particular attorney's strategies beforehand.

As has been mentioned previously, was it a self-defense situation that a reasonable person would say likely had cause of fear of serious bodily injury or death. I believe that is the question.
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation...
Elementary Education.

Now, go figure...
AZAK is offline  
Old April 28, 2012, 07:36 AM   #20
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
According to an article in Handloader magazine last year no one has been prosecuted or sued for using hand loads to legitimately defend themselves.

IIRC there was a case where one guy was sued for using excessive force for using a 10mm. They claimed it did excessive damage beyond what was required. Don't know how it came out. Doesn't seem to be much logic there because a 10mm is puny compared to a 12 gauge load of buck shot.

I can't imagine a custom gun would be the deciding factor in whether or not you get sued or prosecuted.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old April 28, 2012, 07:47 AM   #21
jhenry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
I think having a custom handgun is as much of a non issue as having handloaded ammo, assuming the handloads replicate standard stuff.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer
jhenry is offline  
Old April 28, 2012, 07:52 AM   #22
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,815
A couple of things are important to understand here:

First, nobody gets sued or prosecuted for using handloads or for using a custom gun, because neither is illegal or tortious. However, that's entirely different from saying that handloads or a custom gun cannot complicate the legal aftermath of a SD shooting.

Second, the legal problems associated with handloads are entirely different from those which would be associated with a custom gun. The handload problem is an evidentiary one and there's an archive of threads in L&CR where all of those issues are dissected. A custom gun doesn't suffer from the same evidentiary problems that handloads do, but may have its own set of problems.

Hammerhead, that 10mm case is the Harold Fish case.

One of the main problems with the idea that "a good shoot is a good shoot" is that the shooter doesn't get to make that decision. Sometimes, a good shoot is only a good shoot after the responding officers, investigators, prosecuting attorney(s), a judge and jury have decided that it was a good shoot.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some.
Spats McGee is offline  
Old April 28, 2012, 08:43 AM   #23
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,993
Just get a garden variety weapon and garden variety ammo, though it needs to be something you can trust with your life. If you ever find yourself in a situation where you need to justify your actions legally, the people trying to assign guilt to you in criminal court or a civil court will use every angle, however small, to assign that blame or guilt to you. That high dollar pistol that was customized just for you means that you 'were proud of it and wanted to use it'. Those handloads were 'special man-killer' loads. You know those allegations are not true, but everyone else does not know that and beware of the lawyer that puts that thought in their head. Would it go like that? Probably not. Could it go like that? Absolutely. Minimize your exposure.
603Country is offline  
Old April 28, 2012, 09:26 AM   #24
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,786
I have had several dealings with the legal system - none associated with handguns or self defense, for which I am thankful - and my experience has been that lawyers will try anything they think might win their case. The lawyers on both sides are going to try to project an image of you to a judge or a jury, and both sides can be expected to use information of questionable relevance to sway the judge's or jury's opinion of you. That is just the way an adversarial legal system works. If I ever have to use my firearm defensively, I will expect my selection of handgun and ammunition to be brought up, no matter how defensible it may be, and so I make choices that are easily defended.

Mr. Ayoob has written of cases in which a light trigger prompted civil lawyers to claim that an otherwise defensible self-defense shooting was actually a negligent discharge. They don't have to believe it themselves - it is just a tactic that they think might win their case. I don't remember if they won, but defending against such claptrap can be expensive.

My EDC is stock, but everyone gets to make their own choice.
TailGator is offline  
Old April 28, 2012, 10:12 AM   #25
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
Yeah, a light trigger might be the one thing that would concern me. Not just from a legal point of view, but from a tactical one. I can pull a heavy trigger just fine without adrenaline, so a light one is nothing but a liability when the heart is pounding.
Hammerhead is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.12148 seconds with 8 queries