|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 29, 2011, 11:07 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2009
Location: SW VA
Posts: 491
|
OK, I'm being lazy here
What is the trans-sonic velocity range in FPS?
__________________
___________________ "I'm your huckleberry." |
January 29, 2011, 11:51 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: January 30, 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 46
|
Wikipedia says 1,126 f/sec - at 68 degrees F and presumably at sea level. Altitude, temperature, and even Barometric Pressure can change that figure considerably...
__________________
If it's incoming - DUCK! |
January 29, 2011, 12:04 PM | #3 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
I believe the general range is roughly from mach .8 to mach 1.2.
Mach 1 at standard atmosphere and sea level is 1,116 fps, so "transsonic" would be from 892 fps to 1339. However, that is the area generally used in aviation, where drag begins to increase drastically at the low end up to the point where all airflow around the aircraft becomes supersonic at the high-end. I assume that a bullet will have a much lower range of speed where the instability would be a problem.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
January 29, 2011, 12:10 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,824
|
Its faster than the winged velocity of an unladen European Swallow.
Airspeed can also be predicted using a published formula. By inverting this midpoint Strouhal ratio of 0.3 (fA/U ≈ 0.3), Graham K. Taylor et al. show that as a rule of thumb, the speed of a flying animal is roughly 3 times frequency times amplitude (U ≈ 3fA).5 We now need only plug in the numbers: U ≈ 3fA f ≈ 15 (beats per second) A ≈ 0.22 (meters per beat) U ≈ 3*15*0.22 ≈ 9.9 ... to estimate that the airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is 10 meters per second. Sorry, couldn't resist carry on, nothing to see here
__________________
Chief stall mucker and grain chef Country don't mean dumb. Steven King. The Stand |
January 29, 2011, 02:35 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,883
|
This is "Trans"sonic.....
The front half of the bird is supersonic. The back half is subsonic. Peetzakilla's +/- 20% Mach is a nice round esimate for flow effects in general. But numbers vary dramatically from application-to-discipline: http://search.aol.com/aol/imageDetai...ary-online.org But the fighter shot also shows why you want to minimize the chances of your bullet dropping back through this transition if you are looking for long-range precision Last edited by mehavey; January 29, 2011 at 02:53 PM. |
January 29, 2011, 02:44 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2009
Location: SW VA
Posts: 491
|
Mehavey
I've had the privilege of seeing that sight at sea (USS Roosevelt) - both by an F-14 and F-18. The 'Cat was by far the more impressive of the two. Thanks guys - now I can transliterate to my Barn Swallows from that Eurotrash bird!
__________________
___________________ "I'm your huckleberry." |
January 29, 2011, 02:47 PM | #7 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
Well, technically, it's the air that's "half" subsonic and "half" supersonic. That pilot would be having a very bad day if half his plane was faster than the other half!
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
January 29, 2011, 03:16 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,883
|
For y'all's explosive viewing pleasure...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a32z-HZlq1o&feature=fvsr (More reasons not to have bullets go trans-sonic if you can avoid it.) Last edited by mehavey; January 29, 2011 at 03:27 PM. |
January 29, 2011, 03:26 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2005
Posts: 2,017
|
Quote:
__________________
"Why is is called Common Sense when it seems so few actually possess it?" Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. |
|
January 29, 2011, 03:58 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
|
to estimate that the airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is 10 meters per second
Awesome movie is was. Could watch it over and over. Cracks me up everytime i watch it
__________________
NRA Certified RSO NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional |
January 29, 2011, 04:45 PM | #11 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
January 29, 2011, 04:56 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2005
Posts: 2,017
|
Wait--we're getting off-track here. We need to pull it back on-topic a little...
A TRANS-SONIC COCONUT! Now THAT would be something, wouldn't it? Especially if there were a swallow involved...
__________________
"Why is is called Common Sense when it seems so few actually possess it?" Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. |
January 29, 2011, 05:03 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
|
"The front half of the bird is supersonic. The back half is subsonic."
Hummm...there's an interesting concept in there somewhere. |
January 29, 2011, 05:04 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
|
A TRANS-SONIC COCONUT! Now THAT would be something, wouldn't it? Especially if there were a swallow involved...
Only if the coconut was being transported by the Black Knight While chasing the swallow
__________________
NRA Certified RSO NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional |
January 29, 2011, 05:08 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2005
Posts: 2,017
|
Or... How about a trans-sonic COW!! I want THAT catapult!
Holy-hell, the OP probably thinks we've all gone completely off the deep end...
__________________
"Why is is called Common Sense when it seems so few actually possess it?" Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. |
January 29, 2011, 05:30 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2009
Location: SW VA
Posts: 491
|
Actually, no. What an unexpected treasure trove of tid-bits about trans-sonic, um, objects.
Now, I'm thinking Cat-in-the-Hat... the blur of the red and white strips as he transitions through the compression wave
__________________
___________________ "I'm your huckleberry." |
January 29, 2011, 06:25 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
|
Egor started it.Ya ,It's all his fault,,Ya lets blame him,,Shame on you Egor
__________________
NRA Certified RSO NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional |
January 29, 2011, 07:33 PM | #18 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
You know how you prove that a coconut is transonic?!
It'll turn you into a Gnut! (but you'll get better!)
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
January 29, 2011, 09:54 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2009
Location: SW VA
Posts: 491
|
buzzkill warning
RANGE YARDS MUZZLE 50 100 200 300 400 500 600 1000
VELOCITY FPS 2700 2602 2504 2314 2132 1951 1778 1617 1117 VELOCITY FPS 2600 2501 2405 2219 2038 1861 1694 1536 1078 So, if I'm understanding this right, the 168 SMK Federal GMM will transition out of supersonic around 958 to 993 yards, and become inherently less stable at those ranges (give standard normal atmospheric conditions). Coconuts, however, with their substantially better BC will remain supersonic out to about 1100 yards. Yes?
__________________
___________________ "I'm your huckleberry." |
|
|