|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 6, 2009, 01:50 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2007
Posts: 472
|
.38 / .357 Bullet Design ---
What would be the best lead bullet to use for self defense and
hunting in .38 / .357 cal ---a Semi wadcutter design or the RF Round Flat Nose design , both in 158 gr. weight ? Thanks |
March 6, 2009, 10:06 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
|
If you are trying for maximum power, the WFN design does leave a little more space for the powder and allow for a little more velocity at the same max pressure. Some guns shot them great, while others shoot the SWC shape better. Also, LBT's "ballistic wadcutter" is even better than the WFN design with respect to leaving more space for the powder. It is essentially a wadcutter that has a very slight rounding to the nose edge and crimps as far out of the case as you can fit in your cylinder. Its only problem is that it will start to tumble after about 90 yards, so it is not a long range round. But, it has the widest nose (meplat) of any bullet shape.
If you are not worried about max velocity, then just pick a bullet shape with the widest flat area at the nose. (Flat area around the shoulder of the bullet, like the ring that cuts paper on the semiwadcutter shape, doesn't add anything to the wounding capability in flesh.) Again, plain wadcutters (NOT hollow-based) can be loaded hot if they are hard-cast lead, and they have a tremendous wounding effect. But, they are not long-range bullets. They lose velocity rapidly and also become unstable at a little more than 50 yards. If you want to spend more on bullets, Speer now makes Gold Dot bullets that are designed to expand at all sorts of velocities, inlcuding expanding bullets for short-barrelled .38 snubbies. SL1 |
March 6, 2009, 12:22 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
My vote goes to the SWC.
In my 20 years in LE in Anchorage, I had to put down 8 moose after a Moose/Car incounter. My Service revoler was the Smith Model 28 357, I found the SWC best as I never had to shoot one twice. I also carry SWCs in my 642 pocket pistol. Its my SD load but I do a lot of camping, horseback riding etc. and like to supplement my dinner with camp meat, I.E. cotton tails. I found the SWC works pretty good there too. I use the 150 grn (lvman 358477) cast bullet. The reason being, fixed sight revolvers are sighted in by design for a certain bullet. Most for the 158 grn. Using lighter bullets will cause them to shoot low. The recoil caused by the bullet weight is used to sight in a fixed sight pistol. The 158 grn is the norm, but not allways the case. My 642's sight works with the 150s. The WCs I cast for practice also throw (with my lead mixture 150s grns. There fore the point of aim is the same as my carry bullet. I've tried differant HP bullets, they dont always expand in my short barreled 642. My SWC bullets dont always expand either. I'm of the opinion that a SWC that dosnt expand is better then a HP that dosn't expand. JMHO
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
March 6, 2009, 04:54 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2008
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 259
|
I shoot 158gr. SWC in my 638 snubby for the same reason as kraigwy with regard to fixed sighting. IMO, 158gr. cast SWC is the mainstay of 38/357 caliber and the standard by which other bullets should be judged. They're not the best at everything, but do a lot of things really well; the most versatile.
|
March 6, 2009, 07:56 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,943
|
Buy an older Lyman 357446 single cavity mould and have it hollowpointed. Load it over 5.0 of Unique in the 38, and 13.5 of 2400 in the 357. CB.
__________________
If you want your children to follow in your footsteps, be careful where you walk. Beware the man that only owns one gun; he probably knows how to use it. I just hope my ship comes in before my dock rots. |
March 6, 2009, 11:59 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2007
Posts: 472
|
Thanks to everybody-You guys Always come through with All the Right
Answers. One more question--- Would a lead casting mixture of 2% Tin 6% Antimony 92% Lead Make for a good mix for a .357 Magnum in the 1250-1350 fps range using Lee Alox for lube and hopefully little or no leading ? Thanks Again |
March 7, 2009, 12:12 AM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,024
|
Elmer Keith developed the .44 magnum using 20:1 lead tin. Your alloy is harder than that, so yes, it will be fine.
SL1, What weight and length is the ballistic wadcutter? It would have to be pretty long to start tumbling, I should think? I presume it is slowing into transonic velocities at 50 yards.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
March 7, 2009, 09:30 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
|
Unclenick,
You asked: Quote:
Since he makes the molds, he will give ou whatever weight you want, within reason. So, your speculation about trans-sonic speed causing the instability is reasonable. Most wadcutters are launched at subsonic speed for target loads. I have never shot my normal target wadcutters at 100 yards to see what happens beyond 50 yards, where mine seem very accurate. If the subsonic wadcutters also tumble beyond 50 yards, then it is a shape thing. If they don't then I suspect that Smith's addition of a round edge on the nose only increased the BC so that they got farther out before going trans-sonic. SL1 |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|