|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 13, 2015, 07:54 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Fired case law in MD killed by new Gov.
Finally this thing was a dodo from day one & now its dead as one.
I still want to know how there was no money for it when there was a $35.000 charge for every case submitted. Where did the money go?
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
May 13, 2015, 08:31 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: Cowtown of course!
Posts: 1,747
|
Quote:
Glad to see this fall to the way side. Now if a few more would follow suit.
__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearms Safety, Pistol and Rifle Instructor “Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life......” President John F. Kennedy |
|
May 13, 2015, 10:56 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
That's a lot of administration for something that consisted of dropping the sealed envelope in a 55-gal oil drum & ignoring it!
Since 2000 the totals have been: 304,548 rounds submitted, @ $35 per. that comes out to $10,659,180.00. Now they're looking for funds to dispose of them. Err, ummm. IT'S BRASS, SELL IT!
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
May 13, 2015, 11:56 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
Holy Smoke! Even New York dropped the fired case business a few years ago. Maryland if really slow to catch on.
__________________
Jim Page Cogito, ergo armatum sum |
May 13, 2015, 12:15 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 5, 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 474
|
link to story from few months ago:
http://www.capitalgazette.com/news/p...,4874803.story one quote: "The state collects the bullets." another: "As the firing pin hits the bullet," oh my.....umm...the bullet is long gone by the time the shell casing is sent to the state or left on the ground.... |
May 13, 2015, 12:27 PM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
The Maryland program is called MD-IBIS. It has been a failure. In fact, its failure was acknowledged by the director himself in 2004:
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
May 13, 2015, 03:34 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Nope, it was just "case collection", nothing more was done ever. Rumor has it that every barracks in the state has several 55-gallon drums of un-logged, never opened "official sealed envelopes" of the submitted cases.
The reason they never got any hits was because they never entered the data.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
May 13, 2015, 04:19 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 5, 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 474
|
for sale: once fired brass, mixed manufacturers and mixed calibers.....
|
May 13, 2015, 06:47 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Since $35 was collected for a complete process of case origin and data logging, which sounds as if it was not done, you Marylanders should demand an audit and file claims for thousands of full or partial refunds. Your fees were earmarked legally for expenditures pursuant to the program, and nothing else.
You have legal standing if you paid the fee. Complaints for waste, fraud, and abuse could be a good idea, too. When the pols realize they're going to spend lots of money defending failure, maybe they won't be so quick to enact stupid laws, next time around. |
May 13, 2015, 06:53 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
|
|
May 13, 2015, 11:35 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
True enough, but they would rather spend it on their pet projects, not on dealing with blowback.
Up here we're looking at spending $100 to give low-income folks a $20 rebate on their $60 car tabs. The people who wrote the law are under scrutiny, and they don't like it. Do the same in Maryland. Make 'em sweat. |
May 14, 2015, 02:06 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 1999
Location: Longmont, CO, USA
Posts: 4,530
|
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
__________________
Gun Control: The premise that a woman found in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is morally superior to allowing that same woman to defend her life with a firearm. "Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house." - Jules Henri Poincare "Three thousand people died on Sept. 11 because eight pilots were killed" -- former Northwest Airlines pilot Stephen Luckey |
May 14, 2015, 05:37 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
|
I never heard of that law. it sounds like complete insanity.
since criminals use stolen guns more often than not, who is this law designed to burden? sounds like a silly law enacted just to further roadblock gun ownership, not actually make anyone safer. it sounds like the 26 times the program has helped link guns to a crime, was after they had possession of the actual gun used and forensics were ran as any other police department does it. am I reading it wrong, or did the data base of logged cases NEVER actually help solve a crime?
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed Last edited by Tom Servo; May 14, 2015 at 10:38 AM. Reason: Let's not suggest that |
May 14, 2015, 07:22 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Its a matter of record. Never, not even once.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
May 14, 2015, 07:23 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
|
May 14, 2015, 08:39 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: July 13, 2011
Location: MD *gah*
Posts: 57
|
As a MD resident, I'm still amazed they actually repealed it... since when did they EVER admit to making a mistake (even by implication, as is the case here)? They usually just keep insisting "just a little more money will make it work".
Gaah. I gotta move. Last edited by Tom Servo; May 14, 2015 at 10:37 AM. Reason: Politics |
May 14, 2015, 10:25 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Not to drift into politics here but the change of Governor was a major player in the decision.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
May 15, 2015, 12:49 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
|
Md gets the message that these systems are expensive and useless. I am pretty sure that NY did as well, millions of dollars and no "hits" later. California though has doubled down. AG Harris declared in 2013that "microstamping" technology was generally available, and therefore all new pistols had to comply with the microstamp law enacted in 2007. [Now it turns out that her declaration is in jeopardy, as the law requires the case to be stamped in two places, but the "generally available" technology is not only experimental, it only stamps the "case" in one place--the primer. But that is a different story.]
So how is this microstamping law any different than anyone else's casing library? Theoretically it would be easier to identify spent casings, but there is the same old problem that most crime guns have been stolen--so knowing who was the original owner tells the police absolutely nothing (in most cases) that will assist them in identifying the shooter. Which means that California is doubling down on a program that cannot possibly work. |
May 15, 2015, 07:25 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
They took in literally millions of dollars to drop envelopes in big cans. That was it.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|