The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 20, 2011, 11:00 AM   #1
Winchester_73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
Mauser 1934 - many questions

I have the chance to acquire a Mauser 1934. I know some parts had the SN, or at least part of it. So I have the following questions:

1) Which parts have all or part of the SN?

2) Were the grips serial numbered?

3) Were any recently imported to the US? My friend said some were.

4) Where should I look for an import mark?

5) How are original mags marked?
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west
Winchester_73 is offline  
Old February 20, 2011, 03:37 PM   #2
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The full serial number is on the left of the slide and the back of the frame. The last four are on the barrel lug, the sear, the side plate and the disconnector. The grips are not numbered. The most common magazine is the round front, with banner, but I have seen plain ones that seemed to be original. They were not usually numbered although some police issue guns had the last three of the serial number on the bottom front.

I don't recall seeing any recent imports, but there may have been some. The import mark could be anywhere on the gun.

HTH

FWIW, all those Mauser pistols, including the HSc, are highly collectible, but IMHO are poor pistols for serious purposes, being complex and prone to breakage.

Jim

Last edited by James K; February 20, 2011 at 03:54 PM.
James K is offline  
Old February 22, 2011, 08:34 AM   #3
Winchester_73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
Thanks Jim. Now that I know what I need to know, of course the seller has yet to get back to me. They are neat little guns. The Germans made great guns, for the most part.
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west
Winchester_73 is offline  
Old February 22, 2011, 12:13 PM   #4
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
"The Germans made great guns..."

Unfortunately, IMHO, those Mauser pistols were not among them. I never understood how a company that designed and made THE definitive bolt action rifle made such poorly designed pistols. The old WWII movies always seemed to have Peter Lorre as the German spy, and he always had a Mauser. I thought it was a good thing he never had to shoot anyone as three springs would break if he did.

Even the fabulous C96 (Broomhandle) was an obsolete POS by 1910 and it was only because Mauser tied pistol sales to rifle sales that anyone bought them at all. Even the Luger is a better gun than the Broomhandle.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old February 23, 2011, 11:10 AM   #5
Winchester_73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
Quote:
Even the fabulous C96 (Broomhandle) was an obsolete POS by 1910 and it was only because Mauser tied pistol sales to rifle sales that anyone bought them at all. Even the Luger is a better gun than the Broomhandle.
Tell you what Mr. Keenan, you can have the French handguns and I'll take the German ones.

I'm pretty sure the broomhandle which was a "POS" by 1910, by your undertanding was one of the first select fire handguns ever made, which IMO, is a big advantage for the time. The luger should be compared to period revolvers or the 1911 as nothing else is a fair comparison.

What exactly, by your definition, makes the Mauser pistols so terrible? I'm curious...The basic design was originated in about 1910 or thereabouts so I think the age of the firearm, for WWII, should be considered. Perhaps it wasn't a great design by then, but how many handguns were at that time, when they're about 25+ yrs old?

Kind of reminds me of my uncle who criticizes the Winchester 1873 for the toggle action design compared to the 1892 when the 1873 was almost 20 yrs its senior, ahead of its time and one of the best selling, most infamous rifles of all time. The times have to be considered in these scenarios...
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west
Winchester_73 is offline  
Old February 23, 2011, 11:36 AM   #6
jal5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 419
I enjoy shooting mine at the range, not regularly but occasionally. That firing pin is a pain to replace at least on mine as I had to modify one purchased since this gun was a vet bring back a looong time ago.

If you do dry fire it make sure you use a snap cap as the fp is prone to breaking!

Here is a link to my posts about it-
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=348415

Joe
__________________
We live in the greatest country on Earth- always be thankful!
jal5 is offline  
Old February 25, 2011, 03:50 PM   #7
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
Perhaps "POS" wasn't the best term to use for the 1896 Mauser, but it was obsolete by 1900 as far as I'm concerned. It was a product of the 1890's, when auto loaders were in their infancy, was a machinist's nightmare and was, in fact, a relatively weak design due to the fact that a small piece, known colloquially as a "bolt stop" was all that kept the bolt out of your forehead.

Browning realized early on that utilizing a small piece of metal to keep a recoiling part out of your face wasn't a good idea and subsequently remedied the problem. Mauser kept the 1896 limping on until the 1930s, with large scale sales mostly to the Chinese.

The 1910/1914/1934 design by Josef Nickl was equally as bad with more complicated machining, fragile springs and a lockwork that wouldn't function if the sideplate wasn't tight enough. Even worse, an idiosyncrasy of Nickl's design was that the slide was released when a loaded magazine was inserted, automatically chambering a round. I can't account for every Mauser 10/14/34, but I have personally witnessed at least 6 guns over the years that have had AD's because of that feature.

Certainly can't fault the workmanship, though.
gyvel is offline  
Old February 25, 2011, 04:08 PM   #8
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
Quote:
Kind of reminds me of my uncle who criticizes the Winchester 1873 for the toggle action design compared to the 1892 when the 1873 was almost 20 yrs its senior, ahead of its time and one of the best selling, most infamous rifles of all time. The times have to be considered in these scenarios...
FWIW, if I'm not mistaken, the toggle design of the 1873 was originated (or inspired, if you prefer) by Walter Hunt's design, ca. 1848, and was carried over to the pre Civil War Volcanic and Henry firearms. Winchester kept the toggle design limping on until 1919 simply because it was profitable, not because it was a particularly great design.
gyvel is offline  
Old February 25, 2011, 04:14 PM   #9
Winchester_73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
Quote:
Winchester kept the toggle design limping on until 1919 simply because it was profitable, not because it was a particularly great design.
But because it sold so well, and made such a reputation for itself, it was a great design, which is my point. Its not the best, but its certainly a great one. Not every gun maker even has 1 model which is as successful to the company. The toggle design of course had its limitations, but on the other hand, the gun was designed for black powder pistol rounds. But, the model 1876 may have caused a lot of the toggle design criticisms since the more powerful rounds could have possibly helped that gun to fail internally.

But I digress, I hope to get this mauser this week or next. I will post pics when I do.
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west
Winchester_73 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06750 seconds with 8 queries