June 14, 2011, 04:47 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Thanks for the excerpt, Brent.
younggunz4life, I think you and some others really need to re-check the concept of "brandishing." Making a weapon ready when somebody else has already attacked people, or obviously prepared to attack people, is not "brandishing" in any jurisdiction of which I am aware. People on TFL throw "brandishing" around in all sorts of ways, that actually don't apply. So, the guy has stabbed some people, and folks here think the owner was unreasonable in having gun in hand? Really? Then, it also turns out the guy has a gun. I wonder if the OP actually read the article about the incident before he posted.... |
June 14, 2011, 04:59 PM | #27 | |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
MLeake is very correct and I cringe to hear the term "BRANDISHING" used inaccurately...
So without further ado I give you a fair definition of the word... Quote:
|
|
June 14, 2011, 05:13 PM | #28 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/artic...0_MEDICI832088 Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
||
June 14, 2011, 06:14 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
mleake, hogdog
Quote:
my response was not to any actual story or other posts: my reply was to the original post quoted above. I was under the impression when I read it that man got out of his car with a gun...and thats when my wheels started turning to the possible "personality" that got out of the car with gun in hand(one example of many: loud, verbal communication as clubowner gets out of vehicle with gun). I know I mentioned in my hurried post when I was running late that there wasn't enough info for me & it would've been nice to observe that one from afar. anyways, maybe brandishing was incorrect wording, but brandishing comes in many forms. that being said, it does seem @ this point like the club owner was more of the hero type than thug type. all the best
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
|
June 14, 2011, 06:37 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
caught up on posts
hogdogs: I do not feel I used the term brandishing inaccurately. It is possible you misinterpreted my post.
mleake: No, I didn't know of the stabbings and such either. My viewpoint was from a different angle, but its good the thread has been pulled more compactly together. all the best. GO BRUINS!
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
June 14, 2011, 06:41 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
younggunz4life, the drunk had already stabbed patrons; the club owner had been told the drunk was assaulting people with a deadly weapon. When he arrived, and the guy was still there, exiting his vehicle with weapon drawn was prudent, given the information the owner had at the time.
A prudent draw, when deadly force has already been employed, is NOT brandishing, so you did use the term inaccurately IMO. "Brandishing" implies intent to create a disturbance or unlawfully threaten people. In this case, the drunk had employed deadly force, and was armed and aggressive. Display of a weapon in order to ward him off would not qualify as brandishing. Drawing the weapon, to be prepared against an attacker who has already displayed willingness to employ deadly force, is also not brandishing. |
June 14, 2011, 06:46 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
mleake, I guess its my turn to go under your microscope? lol. no, all kidding aside- you have the right to your opinion. all I knew when I read the thread starter(or interpreted the thread starter) was that a man got out of his car with a gun in his hand(brandishing a gun) because a man was drunk and disorderly outside his business while cops were on the way. thats why I asked: "what's the point of the weapon being brandished?" in my 1st post.
of course, it is obvious there were other, more serious mitigating factors present during this incident(as you have pointed out)
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
June 14, 2011, 06:48 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
It's not a matter of "my" microscope; it's a matter of your using a term that has legal meaning and weight.
Brandishing is an unlawful display of a weapon. Sometimes, words matter. |
June 14, 2011, 06:50 PM | #34 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
Neither is exiting your car to enter your business with a firearm in hand but carried discretely.
Brandishing is a term with very specific parameters to qualify for its use. Brent |
June 14, 2011, 07:22 PM | #35 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
Let me try this one more time
OK, you were right // mleake said:
Quote:
I DIDN'T EVEN REALIZE IT WAS A REAL INCIDENT. I THOUGHT THE OP WAS JUST THROWING OUT A 'STAND YOUR GROUND' SCENARIO. Quote:
good to know I can explain things to you // again, obviously there were more serious factors going on that I didn't realize originally in this real life, true event. ALL THE BEST, GUNZ
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
||
|
|