|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 27, 2009, 10:54 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,951
|
ESI Agent: You can blame your situation on Consumer Affairs, Bureau of Security and Investigativ Services
A lot of your problem is with Bureau passed admistrative regulations which have the effect of law although not passed by the Legislature per se.
__________________
http://www.armsmaster.net-a.googlepages.com http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/f...aster270/Guns/ Retired LE, M.P., Sr. M.P. Investigator F.B.I. Trained Rangemaster/Firearms Instructor & Armorer, Presently Forensic Document Examiner for D.H.S. |
September 28, 2009, 06:58 AM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Posts: 5
|
What this Advocate article failed to mention was the way these rogue cops took me into custody.
AFTER their 6 week ROOKIE RESERVE OFFICER checked me out and RELEASED me, four car loads of his thug buddies "captured" me at gunpoint. The first words off the lead officer's lips were "are you a law enforcement officer?" This question told me all I needed to know. They realized I was not a criminal and also conveyed it's their opinion only THEY can carry guns. |
September 28, 2009, 08:23 AM | #28 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2006
Posts: 1,310
|
To mskdgunman:
If you are the LEO you assert yourself to be, you mus know that this statement is totally wrong: Quote:
Your other statement shows another lack of understanding of the law: Quote:
__________________
Caveat Emperor |
||
September 28, 2009, 09:01 AM | #29 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Eastern, TN
Posts: 1,236
|
Quote:
Quote:
You know divemedic, that was my impression as well and I addressed it in my earlier post. Having read these statements, and all the recent case law that is appearing concerning this topic, I can draw only a couple of conclusions; 1) LE agencies are not training their officers on the laws concerning OC, or CC. 2) The agencies are aware of the laws but choose to thumb their collective noses at it in order to forward some "agenda" Or, a combination of the two.
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska - Last edited by OuTcAsT; September 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM. |
||
September 28, 2009, 11:39 AM | #30 | |||
Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 74
|
Mark, thank you for standing up for all of our rights.
Outcast, I agree with you 100%. I cannot even relate how disturbed I am to hear of our LEOs with the attitude of mskdgunman. I would certainly appreciate the opportunity to peacefully, after having fully obeyed the officer, Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I certainly hope you reconsider your position on OC mskdgunman.
__________________
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July; democrats believe every day is April 15." -Ronald Reagan |
|||
September 28, 2009, 01:37 PM | #31 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Posts: 5
|
While I cannot discuss the settlement, I CAN post a pic of one of my new bikes........
|
September 28, 2009, 01:41 PM | #32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Posts: 5
|
Here are two of them............
|
September 28, 2009, 01:51 PM | #33 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Mark, while I understand why you cannot discuss the settlement, unless the court records are also sealed, can you discuss the case?
Such as; 1) The violations in the original complaint, 2) the City's rebuttal arguments, 3) discovery and motions, and 4) anything that happened at trial (assuming it went that far). As I understand it, generally the settlement agreement will state that the City/County/State does not admit to any wrongdoing, regardless of any monetary settlement made. That's a given. I am most interested in items #1 and #2 above. |
September 28, 2009, 01:52 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2006
Posts: 1,310
|
I wouldn't post those pics with a tag on them. This will only make you a target for other police actions.
__________________
Caveat Emperor |
September 28, 2009, 01:57 PM | #35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Posts: 5
|
The ONLY violation I was booked with was 14:95, illegal carrying of a weapon.
If any of you guys read the statute, you'd realize in short order it didn't apply to me. There was NO attorney ( I could find) who was willing to take this matter to trial, so I had no choice but an out-of-court settlement. I know, not my first choice, either. There were no depositions, nothing. The sheriff's office managed to get itself removed as a defendant during the preliminary motions. I have no qualms about posting my plate. If they or any of their thugbuddies want to show their true colors, go for it. |
|
|