|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 11, 2009, 06:14 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 9, 2001
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 89
|
My first C&R order came today.
I ordered two Hex receiver 91/30s. And I agreed to sell one to my friend. I don't know why, I guess I should have ordered 3 so I could keep 2.
But I got them today and they are great, but I have to decide which to keep. They are basically the same, both are great and in very good/excellent condition. But bluing is only worn on the end of the barrels, and a few spots here and there. The big difference is one is from 1929, and has beautiful wood. The other is from 1922 and has nice wood, but has some repairs in a few spots. This one also has a few more things stamped into the receiver. I wanted the opinion of some other collectors and what might be worth more or what might be deemed as more collectible. Or what some of you prefer. I was leaning towards the 1922, just because it is older, but man that other one sure is nice to look at. It's already beginning. I got the license in October and I put off buying because I was short on cash, and now I have started and already today I have checked every website I can think of looking for something else.
__________________
Gun Control Means hitting your target Sorry my e-mail doesn't work. E-mail me at: [email protected] |
March 11, 2009, 09:28 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 2,011
|
The bug has bitten
Keep the purty one
Now go have a look at the cz 52 they are a hoot. And pretty cheap to shoot.
__________________
ricklin Freedom is not free |
March 12, 2009, 08:18 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 616
|
Quote:
+1 on the CZ-52. CZ-82 isn't bad either.
__________________
No matter how big and tough you are, when a two-year-old hands you a toy phone you'll answer it. |
|
March 12, 2009, 08:58 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
March 12, 2009, 03:25 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,573
|
Definitely shoot them both ... if the 1922 shoots better, then drop it into the 1929 wood and keep THAT one ... these are certainly rearsenaled rifles anyway, so I wouldn't think that there is any chance that the wood is original on either one. This way, you get the benefit of being the one who has the C&R.
As for next acquisitions, if you reload, the Nagant revolvers are a steal and are a nice match for your new rifle. Also, along those lines, don't overlook the TT-33's that are out there right now ... much nicer IMHO than the CZ-52's and are every bit as good. Saands |
March 12, 2009, 04:20 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: December 9, 2001
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 89
|
I went with the older one. It really didn't matter to me. It may have a few spots where the wood was fixed, but it still looks really nice.
I think my next purchase might be an M95, I have an Austrian M95 already, but I figured one of them M95/34s or maybe a Hungarian would be alright. Just something to add to the collection that isn't expensive. Or maybe an Enfield, or spending a bit more and getting a K98.
__________________
Gun Control Means hitting your target Sorry my e-mail doesn't work. E-mail me at: [email protected] |
March 12, 2009, 09:40 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 616
|
Quote:
FYI - I think I've read in several places that there's no such thing as a 95/34. Apparently it's a distinction that some importer made up.
__________________
No matter how big and tough you are, when a two-year-old hands you a toy phone you'll answer it. |
|
|
|