|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 10, 2009, 06:50 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Obviously trolling here in the original post however I'll play along for a little. I don't know for sure if the .22 caliber bullet is banned in 80% of the States but it is here in CO, the smallest bullet I can use is a 70 grain .243 caliber rifle that must produce 1000 ft-lbs @ 100 yards. If the .22 caliber center fire rifle is legal where you live and hunt then I have no problems with people using it for hunting.
The main problem with the .22-250 since that is the cartridge chosen in the OP is the twist rate. 1:14 or 1:12 may or may not stabalize a 60 grain bullet again since that is what the OP stated he is using. To me 60 grains is on the marginal end of a bullet that will hold together at the speeds that a .22-250 can push it. The only real choice for me if I had to use this caliber is the 60 grain Nosler Partition. If you are going to use a .22 a premium bullet is a must Barnes, Nosler, and Swift are three that come to mind that offer bullets capable of holding together for use on deer, heavy match grade bullets for me are not an option. There is no doubt to me that a properly placed .22 center fire bullet will kill a deer or any other animal. However the bullet selection and twist rates for these cartridges make it a far from ideal selection for me. I'll leave the .22's for targets and varmints and take at least my .243 Win with 95-100 grain bullets for deer sized game. |
August 10, 2009, 08:16 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 186
|
This post was not meant for trolling but only to educate any body else wondering about the capabilities of the cartridge. When searching TFL I saw the question of whether or not the 22-250 was adequate for deer and then the asker being bashed for even considering it. I do wish I had originally included a little more about proper bullet choices ( I may edit it in now) but my original thought was to get across that the cartridge has been used in a large scale for deer successfully without any problem.
__________________
The mightiest oak in the forest was once only a little nut that stuck its ground. |
August 10, 2009, 08:54 AM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,482
|
Quote:
Thanks for the education, though. |
|
August 10, 2009, 09:01 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
|
Except for the following, I agree with you. I'd also keep shots a bit shy of 300 yards, but that's my opinion.
Quote:
I've shot the 22-250 quite a bit, and I know what it's capable of. I also know that my .243 shoots faster by several hundred fps with the same weight bullet, and I wouldn't use it with the same lightweight bullets generally found in .22 caliber. Those 50-70 grain .22 caliber bullets are perfectly capable of taking deer with well places shots, but they won't do as well when bone is hit, and a little extra penetration is needed. Every caliber/cartridge has it's limitations, and each has different capabilities. As long as the shooter recognized and honors the limitations and capabilities of his/her chosen cartridge, then all should go well. For me, I hunt a lot of open country with big canyons to shoot across at times, and I'll stick with the 7mm mag for those uses. Daryl |
|
August 10, 2009, 09:12 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 186
|
Tracking wounded deer has happened in the 22-250 camp but no more that in the 30-06 camp. It is simply not a problem, at least no more than with any other caliber. As I have already said, I have hunted with other calibers and along side other hunters and clubs using larger guns and then with my unusual situation of having to use .22 caliber in my home county has giving me more insight into this subject than most other people. Hunter error is what leads to that problem not it being a 22-250.
__________________
The mightiest oak in the forest was once only a little nut that stuck its ground. |
August 10, 2009, 09:29 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
The .22-250 or any other .224 caliber center fire cartridge is marginal at best for deer sized game. Deer vary in body size by region what may work well for you in NC may not work in Northern parts of the United States and Canada, as well as out in the Mid West and Western United States for white tail deer. To make such a blanket statement as you did is just asking for an argument intentional or not. Before the laws changed in your county were pistol cartridge rifles and shotguns legal during your firearm season?
Bullet selection and shot placement are paramount regardless of what ever caliber rifle you choose. Again some of the bullets mentioned throughout this topic have either been the wrong construction or would fail to stabilize in the .22-250. And a bullet that will work in a .222 such as the 50 grain mentioned would more than likely fail in a .22-250 due to the velocity differences unless loaded down to a .222 Rem velocities. There is just far less places to go wrong with larger calibers than there is in smaller ones as far as bullet selection is concerned. Especially when you use factory ammunition and most of them have the game use recommendations on the box. Plus the most common bullet found in .22 center fire cartridges is 55 grains and bullets for the .243 and larger calibers usually are found in 80 grains or heavier and tailored to the deer or elk hunter not the varmint hunter. When was the last time you walked in to your local big box store and found 53 gr Barnes TSX, 60 gr Nosler Partitions, or 75 gr Swift Scirocco loaded in .22 caliber cartridges for deer hunting? Not one poster here has argued that it will not kill a deer, just that there are far better choices when it comes to deer hunting. |
August 10, 2009, 09:34 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 186
|
Daryl, Again as I said in post #25 I was talking about the shoulder region or the kill zone, front part of the deer (chest, lung, and heart area). My 60gr SP usually will penetrate the shoulder, although I have seen evidence of the bullet “exploding” when hitting harder parts of the shoulder but there is sill more than enough penetration and/or damage to take the deer down on the spot. I have seen more of this when making spinal shots witch only adds to the effectiveness of shot. The shoulder shot has not been a problem. I personally try to put my shots just behind the shoulder or in the chest if possible but am still confident in taking a straight shoulder shot if needed.
__________________
The mightiest oak in the forest was once only a little nut that stuck its ground. |
August 10, 2009, 10:00 AM | #33 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The mightiest oak in the forest was once only a little nut that stuck its ground. |
|||
August 10, 2009, 10:02 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
|
If legal where you are, go for it.
It is a legal deer round in Oregon, but I am not going to rush out and buy one for deer hunting...
__________________
U.S Army, Retired Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart |
August 10, 2009, 12:01 PM | #35 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is always the variables of life to contend with, As you stated earlier through the story of the deer that was able to run off after being shot in the heart, there is an uncontrollable element to the hunt as well as most things in life. When it comes to deer hunting however, using a 22-250 (properly equipped and deployed) plays no more part in increasing or provoking the variables than any other rifle. Last, I would like to add that I have not said any thing against using larger calibers. I only point out the 22-250 being adequate for deer hunting.
__________________
The mightiest oak in the forest was once only a little nut that stuck its ground. |
||
August 10, 2009, 12:21 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Location: Browns Summit NC
Posts: 2,589
|
If a man wants to hunt deer with a 22/250 he doesn't have to justify it to anybody but himself.
But, you are kidding yourself if you think that eventually if you shoot enough of them you won't lose one that you would have gotten with a 270 or 30/06, and you are kidding yourself if you think you won't eventually make a bad shot. |
August 10, 2009, 12:31 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2009
Posts: 118
|
i will say only this...i have killed dozens of antelope with the 22-250. but yes they are smaller than a deer... never lost one though and usually dead within 25yrds
|
August 10, 2009, 01:37 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2007
Posts: 573
|
I once stalked within 50 yards of a water buffalo bull. Using a termite nest as a rest I shot the feeding buffalo behind the ear & it dropped like a sack of potatoes with a single 55grain bullet from my 22-250. While I wouldn't recommend the 22-250 as a buffalo rifle, I have also shot over a dozen fallow deer & 3 red deer with it, together with hundreds of pigs & goats. I have never lost a deer when hunting with the 22-250, although 2 deer were hit poorly & did need follow up shots. You will certainly get by with using a 22-250 on deer, but these days I prefer to use my 308. I find a 30 caliber rifle my prefered option for deer hunting, especially if a stag of a lifetime happens to show itself at 300 yards & there is a slight wind blowing.
|
August 10, 2009, 02:31 PM | #39 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 12, 2009
Location: Tn
Posts: 400
|
Code:
If a man wants to hunt deer with a 22/250 he doesn't have to justify it to anybody but himself. But, you are kidding yourself if you think that eventually if you shoot enough of them you won't lose one that you would have gotten with a 270 or 30/06, and you are kidding yourself if you think you won't eventually make a bad shot. |
August 10, 2009, 02:48 PM | #40 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
I am not well versed enuff to take on the efficacy argument of a round based on various energy type measurements. Our smaller specimens of florida white tail are likely not much bigger than a good annie goat. I wouldn't choose anything under a .243 and only if I thought I had all escape trails predetermined for easier tracking. I prefer my minimums to be the .270 bolt gun and the .30-30 in lever for my close in shots. I just can't imagine me opting for a .22 class round for white tail.
Brent |
August 10, 2009, 03:19 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
|
Treefarmernc,
I wasn't arguing the ability of the 22-250 to take deer in the hands of a competent shooter that knows his/her rifle's limitations. I'm just saying the .22 caliber bullets aren't the same as bigger bullets, and they'll perform differently on game at times, depending on the shot. I have a .17 Rem that I've no doubt is perfectly capable of taking deer with a well placed shot. I wouldn't use it on a shoulder shot, or a head shot, but through the neck or behind the shoulder would kill a deer without any trouble. I know of one fella who's daughter killed a nice sized caribou bull with a .17 Rem, one shot did the trick. Even so, most would agree that it's light for deer sized game, and I'm not planning on using it for that. It's intended for smaller predators like the coyote and bobcat, and that's what I use it for. I've never had to track a deer yet that I shot with a rifle (archery hunting is a different story, of course). When I shoot, they generally drop in their tracks. Worste case, they drop within a few feet. I shoot them in the right place with a bullet that I know will do the job, and that from a cartridge that launches that bullet with sufficient speed and accuracy to do the job. As long as the shooter knows his rifle/cartridge/load/bullet combination's abilities and limitations, can shoot it well, and knows where to place the bullet for a clean kill, then there should be no problem. Daryl |
August 10, 2009, 03:21 PM | #42 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Quote:
Quote:
Plus what kind of accuracy are you getting with 70 grain bullets you mentioned? An unaltered Remington M700 usually has a 1:14 twist rate and again usually will not stabilize a 70 grain bullet. I’m not saying there are not exceptions to the rule but a 70 grain .224 caliber are usually a little on the long side for such a slow twist. Granted I’ve never used a .22-250 rifle other than shooting a friends a few times. I was impressed with the accuracy and explosiveness of the bullet on prairie dogs and coyotes with bullets up to 55 grains which leads me to believe it, is far from a good choice for deer. Quote:
Like other posters have said, if it is legal then no problem. However I will throw arguments out there against it. Especially to someone who might be reading this post and considering using the .22-250 for deer hunting, without weighing all the pros and cons. Last edited by taylorce1; August 10, 2009 at 04:35 PM. |
|||
August 10, 2009, 04:06 PM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
|
|
August 10, 2009, 05:38 PM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
__________________
The mightiest oak in the forest was once only a little nut that stuck its ground. |
|
August 10, 2009, 05:48 PM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Quote:
The "kill zone" of the deer is the heart, lungs, and major vessel area of the deer. It's required that the bullet actually get there--not just hit the mark like it was a paper target. Again, there's a reason why small caliber CF's are outlawed in many states. Yes, in skilled hands, the .223 or .22-250 can certainly kill deer. A skilled shooter with such a caliber is more effective than an unskilled one with a heavier caliber. But everyone thinks they're capable of "placing the bullet" perfectly to circumnavigate the caliber's lack of penetration and light bullet. It's always the other guys who don't hit the deer right. If your patience and marksmanship skills are up to the task, then you're likely the exception to those who wound deer that would have been humanely killed with an adequate caliber. Last edited by Nnobby45; August 10, 2009 at 05:55 PM. |
|
August 10, 2009, 06:29 PM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Location: Browns Summit NC
Posts: 2,589
|
Quote:
Where did that come from? I have no doubt that you are smarter than the collective intelligence from decades of sportsman whose general consensus is that the 22 caliber centerfires are not the best choice for deer. |
|
August 10, 2009, 06:51 PM | #47 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2009
Posts: 109
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
August 10, 2009, 08:18 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
You don't think a .243 is a good deer rifle, ChiefMuzz?
Odd, it's pretty standard in the southeast. I have several friends who swear by it. For some of the smaller deer in the southeast, a .270 or .30-06 can result in a lot of bloodshot meat.
|
August 10, 2009, 09:25 PM | #49 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The mightiest oak in the forest was once only a little nut that stuck its ground. |
|||
August 10, 2009, 09:26 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2008
Location: south dakota
Posts: 175
|
55 grain hornady ILSP, pushed by a load of varget. Killed a lot of deer with it. If you don't like it, don't try it. Legal here, and legal in Nebraska. 223 is legal here.
|
|
|