The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 7, 2015, 05:39 PM   #1
akinswi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 706
44mag Winchester White Box ammo

Does anybody know the load specs for the 44mag Winchester White Box ammo. My buddy let me shoot some and it was like a hammer. My ruger superblackhawk hunter almost jumped out of my hand the first time I shot one of these rds. I love to handload to those specs. I can't remember the weight of the actual bullet was prob a 240grn.

thanks
akinswi is offline  
Old January 7, 2015, 05:59 PM   #2
laytonj1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Posts: 4,443
The Winchester white box of 44 mag with 240gr. JSP I have states the velocity as 1180 fps at muzzle with 741 ft/lbs of energy. Not exactly a powerful loading.

Jim
laytonj1 is offline  
Old January 7, 2015, 06:18 PM   #3
akinswi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 706
it way was hotter than that. for sure.
akinswi is offline  
Old January 7, 2015, 08:12 PM   #4
Ozzieman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/290...ted-soft-point

Ballistics Information:

•Muzzle Velocity: 1180 fps
•Muzzle Energy: 741 ft. lbs.
__________________
It was a sad day when I discovered my universal remote control did not in fact control the universe.

Did you hear about the latest study.....5 out of 6 liberals say that Russian Roulette is safe.
Ozzieman is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 01:25 AM   #5
DaleA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
Are you sure those were factory loads?

I reload and reuse ammo boxes all the time. (But I almost always mark the box so I can tell what I'm shooting.)
DaleA is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 01:59 AM   #6
akinswi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 706
after everybody showing me the specs, had to be reloads. No way that those bullets were coming out my ruger at 1100fps, more like 1600fps. My buddies anaconda was kicking like a mule too.
akinswi is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 10:52 AM   #7
glenncal1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2009
Location: Denver area
Posts: 504
You have a lot more information about the twinkie you bought at 7-11 on the way to the range than factory ammo. I don't know why they aren't required to list the powder and charge weight on factory ammo. The twinkie lists ingredients, calories, fat grams etc. We should have the same info for ammo.
__________________
Jim

Many K and N Frames
glenncal1 is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 11:35 AM   #8
akinswi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 706
I used to take some rounds apart and see what the charge was, but that really doesnt tell you what powder they use.
akinswi is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 11:42 AM   #9
Snyper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
Quote:
I don't know why they aren't required to list the powder and charge weight on factory ammo.
Because they don't always use powders you can buy off the shelf, and the charge weights can vary with powder lots, but it's hard to change the printing on the box

Velocity is all most people are interested in
__________________
One shot, one kill
Snyper is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 11:42 AM   #10
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
Quote:
I don't know why they aren't required to list the powder and charge weight on factory ammo.
The main reason they don't list the powder and charge weight on factory ammo is practicality. Putting that info on the box is just a waste of the cost of putting that info on the box.

The reason it is a waste is simply because that information is MEANINGLESS to the shooting public, even if they are handloaders.

Factory ammo is loaded with powders not sold at retail. Factories buy powder by the boxcar load, and develop loads with it, to meet desired pressure and velocity specs. Canister grade powders, (the ones sold to handloaders) great care is taken so that each batch is as close to the same as the last one as they can make. So that can of Bullseye you buy today (assuming you can get any) is essentially the same as the can bought 4 years ago, etc.

The powder used by the ammo makers can vary hugely from lot to lot, even with the same "name". They take this into account, and work up loads for each different lot.

So, lot#1234 might use 10.0gr for a certain load and lot#1235 might use 12gr, and lot 1238 might use 8.7gr for the same given load pressure and velocity.

That information has no practical use for us, we can't get the powders they use, And seeing one# lot of ammo used less powder than a different lot# means nothing to us, either, as ALL the lot#s are loaded to the same pressure specs. etc.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 12:42 PM   #11
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
My buddy let me shoot some and it was like a hammer.
Quote:
after everybody showing me the specs, had to be reloads.
Quote:
I can't remember the weight of the actual bullet was prob a 240grn.
I suggest you ask your buddy what the bullet weight was and if they were reloads or not, otherwise everything else is just speculation with the little amount of info you have.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old January 8, 2015, 12:52 PM   #12
Bob Wright
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2012
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 2,989
44AMP:

You so very well explained factory practices regarding the loading of ammunition. Never have I seen it described better.

Bob Wright
__________________
Time spent at the reloading bench is an investment in contentment.
Bob Wright is offline  
Old January 9, 2015, 01:27 PM   #13
Sequins
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2014
Posts: 394
AMP, I just learned something thanks to you. Did you work in a factory? I didn't realize there was such a variation from lot to lot.
Sequins is offline  
Old January 10, 2015, 11:19 PM   #14
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
WWB .44 Magnum 240gr JSP has, in my experience, been very inconsistent ammunition and I, personally, avoid it. On one occasion that I shot it, it seemed to be overpressure displaying disproportionately heavy recoil, flattened primers and very sticky extraction in a S&W 29-2 and 629-6 yet on another occasion it displayed intermittently light recoil and extremely sooty cases, which is a sign of underpressure, in a Ruger Redhawk.
Webleymkv is offline  
Old January 11, 2015, 02:58 AM   #15
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
Isn't the "white box"line considered the cheap stuff? bargain ammo, not top shelf stuff? QC issues show up more in the cheap stuff, or so it seems.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old January 11, 2015, 10:36 AM   #16
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Winchester shows a velocity of 1180fps from both of it's offerings in 240 gr .44 mag, including their high priced Super-X hunting load. This is from a 4'' vented test barrel. While not the hammer of Thor, not really anemic either. I've never judged the performance of any round by it's recoil, but instead how accurate and consistent it is and how it performs terminally downrange.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 03:01 PM   #17
Snyper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
Quote:
Isn't the "white box"line considered the cheap stuff? bargain ammo, not top shelf stuff? QC issues show up more in the cheap stuff, or so it seems.
QC "should" be the same, since it's largely determined on how the machines are set up and maintained

The cost factor is determined more by the components
__________________
One shot, one kill
Snyper is offline  
Old January 31, 2015, 03:52 PM   #18
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
1180 fps at muzzle is the Winchester standard load for a 240. Hornady XTP is faster than that.
Anyway, CFE Pistol or AutoComp will give you those velocities with a cast bullet. Nearly every powder listed on Hodgdon's site will do it with a jacketed bullet. Seven powders start faster than 1180 fps.
Your Blackhawk got factory grips on it? That style is designed to roll in your hand.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09355 seconds with 10 queries