|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 16, 2011, 11:50 AM | #51 | ||
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: Steubenville, OH
Posts: 4,446
|
Quote:
Newhall ushered in a new era and a wave of officer survival training swept the country. It gradually became OK to say, "Officer Smith was a great guy, but he screwed up, and it got him killed." Quote:
In the mid 70's, I participated in an intense 40 hr. officer survival course in Arizona. One of my instructors was one of the original Newhall investigators. I'm sorry that I can't provide a link, but the conclusion about brass being pocketed came from him, face to face. That was 35 years ago, and while I've forgotten a lot about Newhall, for some reason that was one of the things that stuck in my mind.
__________________
TFL Members are ambassadors to the world for firearm owners. What kind of ambassador does your post make you? I train in earnest, to do the things that I pray in earnest, I'll never have to do. --Capt. Charlie |
||
April 16, 2011, 06:42 PM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Quote:
LOL, Mattix had been shot be Dove and was dead---he just didn't know it yet? Well, he did after Mereles killed him again. |
|
April 16, 2011, 09:57 PM | #53 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,986
|
Quote:
Yes, Platt's initial chest wound was unsurvivable. Medical experts have said that even had he immediately given up and received medical attention he was losing blood too quickly to have survived. Platt was already in bad enough shape that he was having difficulty walking and when he walked over to Mireles, who was on the ground using a car for cover, and shot him at point blank range in the head with a revolver, he missed. And even though he missed he never realized it--he walked back to the car and got into it. It's true that Mireles put an end to the fight by shooting Platt in the head while he sat in the car, but the eyewitness evidence suggests that when he did so, Platt was already unable to fight effectively and was just seconds from dying or losing consciousness.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
April 16, 2011, 11:00 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 31, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,775
|
Quote:
John is right, it was Platt. It also was Platt who did all the damage. Matix was out very early on and it was Grogan or Hanlon who took him out wiht a shot thru the wrist and arm. Platt was a dead man walking but he walked long enough to kill two agents and wound several more. As Dr. Anderson said, the human body can do much if the will commands it to.
__________________
"God and the Soldier we adore, in time of trouble but not before. When the danger's past and the wrong been righted, God is forgotten and the Soldier slighted." Anonymous Soldier. |
|
April 16, 2011, 11:51 PM | #55 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Quote:
There was also speculation that Maddux's ear drum was ruptured by Platt's Mini 14, but I understand that the autopsy showed otherwise. |
|
April 17, 2011, 12:01 AM | #56 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,986
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
April 17, 2011, 11:55 AM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 445
|
RE: Brass in the pocket - after the change in CHP (and other agency) training about dropping brass on the ground, there were no further reports of officers found with brass in their pockets after a shooting. This was not immediate, as it took some time to change ingrained patterns from training. This tends to prove that the officer(s) were conditioned to putting their brass in their pockets on the range.
RE: Body Armor - most commentators here are making a common mistake, imputing to the FBI agents information that was only known later. Once they identified the car, not one agent stopped to get his shotgun out of the trunk, nor did any one other than the one supervisor get his body armor and put it on. No one knew before the first shots were fired that they would be facing a rifle. And even then, if you wear your armor, a round that has hit an intermediate barrier (car door, window glass) may be stopped by pistol rated armor. And during my years as a Fed, I did stop on several occasions on the side of the road to don body armor and obtain my shotgun, before rejoining a moving surveillance.
__________________
Sleuth |
April 20, 2011, 04:07 PM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 530
|
Keep in mind also, if they are "undercover" then there will be times when you can't wear a vest, or have it on the seat for quick access. You are hardly undercover wearing the body armor of that era with a shotgun bolted to the dash.
I don't recall if that was the case in Miami, I read several write up's of the shooting itself, but don't recall if they were all "undercover" or not. |
April 20, 2011, 07:46 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 445
|
There is a vast difference between working undercover (direct intentional contact with crooks) and plain clothes. On the assignment they had, the only reason for not wearing body armor is comfort, which reverts to mindset.
I was a plain clothes investigator at the time, I know.
__________________
Sleuth |
April 21, 2011, 08:21 PM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 530
|
I grant that, I didn't know what their assignment was, I only read write ups of the shooting itself. If I was going out looking for armed bank robbers, I am wearing my vest and keeping a long gun handy. They assumed nothing would happen, and were not prepared for what did happen.
|
April 22, 2011, 03:00 PM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 445
|
Conn Trooper, as a friend of mine is prone to say, "perzackly".
I have pulled over to the side of a CA freeway, donned my body armor, got my shotgun from the trunk and moved it to the front seat, and then jumped back into a surveillance of bad guys taking guns to Mexico. I was "that guy" who took the job seriously - every day. Why didn't I have my armor on? Because I was coming from court, just heading back to my office, and drove right into the surveillance.
__________________
Sleuth |
April 22, 2011, 05:38 PM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 213
|
10 Most
http://listverse.com/2009/10/14/top-...in-us-history/
When looking up the Newhall Shootout I found this. FYI
__________________
NRA Life Member "An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will" It's a free country; in a free country, freedom is for more than just those that conform to the accepted. |
April 22, 2011, 06:47 PM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 445
|
An interesting list, but many of the facts are wrong in the Blair House Shooting (a class by the US Secret Service and a non-fiction book by Steven Hunter), the Norco Bank robbery (I talked at length to an involved officer), and the Miami shooting (see my post above - I have the official investigation report as well as talked to the investigating Metro-Dade Sgt.).
__________________
Sleuth Last edited by Sleuth; April 22, 2011 at 06:57 PM. |
April 22, 2011, 08:40 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 530
|
Me too, which is why I go shoot on my own time, paid out of my pocket to go to Blackwater and bought my own M-4. I would much rather the state pay for it, but if they don't, then I have to. Or go flip burgers, paint houses, sell cars, whatever.
|
April 22, 2011, 10:06 PM | #65 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
uniform VS "soft clothes" VS "undercover"....
I didn't read over all the last few posts but I do take issue with the remarks about LE not being able to prepare or use proper weapons/tactics in a "plainclothes" environment.
To my knowledge, LAPD standard policy for years was that "plainclothes" detectives(D-1 to D-3 & supervisors) have a "crusier ready"(fully loaded, empty chamber) 12ga shotgun upfront in LAPD motor vehicles. Many sworn LE officers & federal/state agents also wear "soft clothes" or uniforms that are not full on duty uniforms but help clearly ID them. Ballcaps, vests, 5.11 pants, polo shirts, etc Highly trained or veteran agents/LE officers can use "undercover" type clothing or gear but they have strict SOPs and must be able to act under covert conditions. Like the LAPD's SIS(special investigations section) or the highly respected "Stake-Out" squad of the NYPD. The LAPD SIS is made up of only senior detectives each with about 15 years or more of service(with excellent records/backgrounds). The SIS has 1 LT has a supervisor. The NYPD stake out squad under well known tactics expert Jim Cirello(who later became a federal instructor at FLETC, www.fletc.gov ) had many use of force incidents w/o any problems. Use of special weapons or tactics can be done. It just takes skill & effort. ClydeFrog |
April 22, 2011, 10:59 PM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Posts: 133
|
Yanno, I keep seeing these exceptions to the rule being trotted out.
It's always "North Hollywood" this, and "Newhall" that. By and large, day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, LEOs aquit themselves admirably using their time-tested SOP, and equipment and firepower which is more than adequate to the job at hand. At one point or another, some exceptional circumstance is going to arise where .40 S&W, .44 Magnum, nor M-16s will prevail, then, YET AGAIN EVERYBODY will be an instant expert, and want LE to change it's SOP paradigm based on yet another highly irregular, exceptional, and singular event. Puh-leeze! |
April 22, 2011, 11:53 PM | #67 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,986
|
Quote:
Just because a situation is out of the norm doesn't mean that it should be ignored or that there are no lessons that can be learned from it. In fact, just the reverse is true. In the interest of making those situations even LESS the norm, it is imperative that people study the outliers and learn the lessons they teach.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
April 23, 2011, 12:11 AM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Vernon AZ
Posts: 1,195
|
A comment about Vest. Vest and Body armor were not in general use at the time of the Miami Shootout. My own department and the Arkansas State Police did not recieve Vest until almost two years after the incident.
Private Money had been raised for the SP but was diverted to other uses. We finally ran a money making drive and purchased Vest and donated them to individual officers. We did the same for the Deputies. Ammo. Our Sheriff contacted his Liability Insurance carrier to determin what type of ammo to carry. They responded with the following. No 45, 38 110 Silvertip, 357 125 silvertip and 9mm 115 Silvertip. Fortunately, he suffered a career ending (under suspecious circumstances) injury and the policy was reversed. Training, mind set, a will to live and pure old fashioned cussedness is the key to survival. The old Navy maximun, "Iron Men in wooden ships will defeat wooden men in Iron ships" applys in all survival situations. |
April 23, 2011, 01:45 AM | #69 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Amen ltc...
Amen ltc...
In late 2004, I worked briefly with a retired LE officer from a small town PD. He told our group of PSCs(contract security on a storm recovery detail) how the city's new manager set up the department's weapons/ammunition policy. Sad but true. |
April 23, 2011, 08:05 AM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Posts: 133
|
Another Navy practice is to train with what you'll have to use in battle.
The lowliest seaman recruit knows practicing with anything but what you'll be using when the SHTF is a bad idea. Last edited by therewolf; April 24, 2011 at 09:49 AM. |
April 23, 2011, 07:13 PM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 445
|
Clyde, we (as Feds) almost always controlled the circumstances of when & where we would arrest someone, or serve a warrant. Since we did not respond to robberies, man with a gun calls, and the like, we did not need to wear armor all the time - unlike local PD's. We did have it handy, along with long guns.
Our policy was, when possible, call the locals to make an unknown risk car stop, as your local officer will make more such stops in a year than most 'Feds" make in a career. The local had their armor on, long guns up front, cage cars, PA systems, and a plan. They liked doing it, because they got a percentage of any monies recovered. Plus, we still had to write all the reports. And Undercover means you are 'impersonating' someone the bad guys think is also a bad guy. They do not wear armor all the time, and to do so would 'blow your cover'. Plain clothes means you are conducting all kinds of investigations - interviewing people who may have information (but no connection to the outlaws), checking records, etc. No one knows you are an LEO unless you tell them.
__________________
Sleuth |
April 24, 2011, 12:41 AM | #72 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Sleuth's post, real true stories from the Highway Patrol...
I understand Sleuth's remarks but in the real world things can sometimes go sideways very quickly.
I recall watching a ep of Spike TV's DEA series where a citizen in Detroit MI walked up to a DEA unmarked vehicle & started talking to the "undercover" special agents. Not good. I also had a incident around 2000/2001 where a group of "undercover" US Secret Service & ICE/CBP agents did a raid on a apartment in the property where I was working security. The federal agents were all in a GM Suburban SUV. They all wore polo shirts & had, I kid you not: "fanny packs". They all looked they were on a golf outing & got lost. One of the special agents showed me his US Secret Service badge & federal creds. The raid was uneventful but it showed me not all LE or narcotics actions have high speed tactical uniforms or special weapons. There was also a local sheriff's office unit that had a buy/bust op going in a crowded tourist area. A subject pulled a firearm & the narcotics deputies fired on him. That to me was poor plans & intel. ClydeFrog |
April 24, 2011, 11:40 AM | #73 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 445
|
Clyde,
Our cars were set up so you could sit in the car with me, and not know it was an LEO car. And of course you 'know' the person who walked up to the agents was not a cooperating witness, or even another officer. And if the USSS and ICE were doing a raid, they certainly were NOT undercover. Could things go wrong in our day to day business? Yup, with only a slighter greater chance than them going wrong for you in your day to day business. I'll say it again - please try to understand it: Plain Clothes does NOT equal undercover.
__________________
Sleuth Last edited by Sleuth; April 24, 2011 at 12:01 PM. |
April 25, 2011, 02:58 AM | #74 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
5x5...
I hear you S, 5x5....
My point is as any kind of sworn LE officer uniform or plainclothes you need to ready for ANYTHING! |
April 25, 2011, 04:19 AM | #75 |
Member
Join Date: January 22, 2001
Location: subduction zone
Posts: 33
|
i have researched the newhall shootings extensively since the early 1970's and just became aware of this posting.
the often passed belief about newhall's "brass in the pocket(s)" is just what it is, a myth. there has never been one shred of evidence uncovered by anyone this happened at newhall for the simple reason that it did not, but bill jordan, did mention such an occurence in another shooting in his book, "no second place winner." with the information available at this time, i cannot determine if the newhall chp officers were carrying magnum loads in their revolvers. the chp issued weapons during that time were either a smith & wesson or colt .38 revolver, though personal .357 revolvers were permitted to be carried. i know for a fact at least one of the officers was carrying a magnum revolver. if one is interested in locating the site of this incident, it is located near where magic mountain is today in valencia, california, right off of southbound interstate 5, in southern california. the shootings occurred at a standard gas station in the area where the marie callendar restaurant stands. for more info, refer to my following submission at: http://www.odmp.org/officer/10509-of...es-e.-pence-jr Last edited by edw794; April 26, 2011 at 02:34 AM. |
|
|