|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 25, 2012, 01:05 PM | #76 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
Quote:
Col. Cooper's intent for the 10mm round was a 200gr bullet with an impact velocity of 1000fps. At normal pistol ranges, that would be a muzzle velocity of about 1050-1075. What we got is something else altogether, and that something else is of limited appeal to most people. I've owned a Delta Elite for over ten years, and have literally never fired a round of factory ammo through it. Expensive factory ammo just doesn't concern me. I love the versatility of a gun that can be loaded down for 9mm-levels of plinking, and .357 Mag. levels of power; what's not to like? It I could keep only one of my handguns, it might be the Delta, as it does everything my eight other 1911 can do, in one package. |
|
September 25, 2012, 05:58 PM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
I would have a 10mm in something, but the Coonan jumped up at the LGS.
Really like .357 in a 1911. I haven't tried anything but full house 158gr softpoints. Someone suggested I load down to 38special levels. Hell no! It's too much fun. Much less blast without a breech gap, too. |
September 25, 2012, 08:07 PM | #78 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 2,018
|
I may just have to pick up a 10mm barrel for my G21... thanks for the inspiration to find another way to spend money Plouffe.
|
September 25, 2012, 08:11 PM | #79 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
|
|
September 25, 2012, 08:15 PM | #80 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 3,415
|
Quote:
__________________
Mrgunsngear Youtube Channel |
|
September 25, 2012, 08:51 PM | #81 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 5,177
|
Why is 10mm not popular? Because most people run with the pack.
I own revolvers in .357 Mag. and .41 Mag, and a 1911 in 10mm. I enjoy each, and respect each for its abilities. I try not to crap on other peoples' choices, or to get ridiculous in defending my own....but some of the posts in this thread strike me as immature willy-wagging. IMHO, if you prefer a semi-auto pistol, and want something with Magnum power (give or take) the 10mm is the only game in town. I guess the Coonan is the lone exception to that, and one day I hope to own one. In the mean time... The .460 Rowland and .45 Super exist, but I am not aware of any factory guns chambered in either (I think that Springfield once-upon-a-time had a .45 Super 1911) but no more. The .460 Rowland (all the ones I've seen) have ungainly long barrels. Each of these in an order of magnitude less main-stream than the 10mm and .41 Mag. FWIW, I do own a .45 Super as well. |
September 25, 2012, 09:28 PM | #82 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
Wilson Combat is making guns in .460 Rowland, though for the price you could have a 10mm, and a .357, with plenty of money left over for ammo.
|
September 25, 2012, 09:33 PM | #83 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
Anything from Wilson Combat will set you back the equivalent of a couple nice guns and then some. I think the XD 460 Rowland conversion makes sense if you want some serious power for a decent price.
|
September 25, 2012, 11:35 PM | #84 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: In the first foothills of the Cascade mountains outside Portland OR
Posts: 156
|
new to 1911 and 10mm
I've had glock 23s (40SW), snub nose .357, 44 mag wheel guns, 454 Casull and smaller handguns, but the Colt Govt model 1911 Delta Elite that I bought has become my carry gun and replaced both the Glock and the .357. I don't think it kicks too much even with Double tap 180s that I chronographed too close to 1500 to bother with. With the Don Hume inside and 5 O'clock carry it's comfortable and comforting.
I wanted one for years and I'll reload after I've got a few hundred pieces of brass. I love the 10mm but I'm a ten nubie. |
September 26, 2012, 02:33 AM | #85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2010
Posts: 598
|
Most of the detractors seem decidedly misinformed or willfully ignorant which is a common condition on internet forums.
It's a big step up from 9mm/40/45. All you need to do is look at the energy levels in hot loads of the respective calibers. Energy increase on the order of 300+ ft lbs. It has more energy at 100 yards than .45 does at the muzzle. Pressure is right with or below normal pressure, +P and +P+ of other calibers (except .45, which operates at a very low pressure in normal loadings, not sure about +P+ pressures). For example, the pressure of 9mm and 10mm are close to identical. Normal pressures of .40 and .357 Sig are both higher. 9mm +p+ higher. In other words, a high pressure gun destroying beast. As far as recoil, it is best in a Glock 20 which is a very, very soft shooting weapon and certainly less snappy than the common Glock 22. It is much less snappy than a 9mm +P+, .45 +P+ or vanilla .40. If you can't shoot a Glock 20 without excessive muzzle flip, your technique needs work or you're too small for the gun. As for being close to .41 magnum, obviously not. .41 Magnum outclasses 10mm. 10mm however is an automatic round. If the situation you needed your weapon for favored an automatic like woods defense or general carry, obviously the .41 magnum being more powerful is irrelevant. If you just want one well placed shot for handgun hunting, then obviously a .41 magnum would be a better choice. Stupid comparison on the pro 10mm side and stupid argument on the con side, too. |
September 26, 2012, 06:04 AM | #86 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 1,031
|
I have the bigass Glock 20, chambered in 10mm.
What I like: -10mm -reliable -accurate -handles the "hotter" 10mm rounds Don't: -10mm is hard to find, harder than 357 SIG -big recoil and fatigue I'm done after 25-30 rounds. I also can't shoot accurate AND fast, which is something I can do with regular 9mm and 45. -Glock trigger |
September 26, 2012, 08:57 AM | #87 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I have a Fusion longslide Classic Hunter. It is a 1911 with 6" barrel. Only holds 8+1, so it yields capacity to the Glock, but it has 1911 ergos and trigger, and the 6" barrel.
DW used to make the PointMan and CBOB in 10mm, too. The Delta is not the only 10mm 1911. |
September 26, 2012, 09:50 AM | #88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
You've got 4 pages of posts about 10mm and counting - I wouldn't say that 10mm is all that unpopular.
|
September 26, 2012, 09:55 AM | #89 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 30, 2009
Location: Southeast LoUiSiAna
Posts: 188
|
The 10mm does have a following...
Learn more about those who like and shoot 10mm...
http://10mm-firearms.com/index.php
__________________
TheSHADOW The "10mm" I'm Packin', Has The Bullets Wackin', Smakin' & The Slide is Rackin' & Jackin'! |
September 26, 2012, 10:00 AM | #90 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
I dont think any one single thing makes it unpopular, its several smaller issues, but in the end it just not terribly practical; the recoil bothers many, limited pistol selection, concerns of over-penetration, cost, availability and so on... Despite all that, I cant really think of a better all around woods gun than a Glock 29 for areas with mildly dangerous furry critters, excluding bears. |
|
September 26, 2012, 04:01 PM | #91 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2004
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 1,528
|
The G29 is a great gun. I should have never sold mine but I am married, and had duplicates of the 10mm and its velocity with the shorter barrel went down more that I thought it would. Funny thing is I never see the G29 in any of my local stores anymore but I do see the G20 now and then.
|
September 27, 2012, 08:47 PM | #92 |
Member
Join Date: September 15, 2012
Posts: 88
|
Check out the penetration on this .10mm!
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1348796831.645614.jpg |
September 27, 2012, 09:01 PM | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2010
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 447
|
I think the reason it is not as popular is this; Those who use it, LOOOOOVE it, and understandably, but those of us who think it is (overkill/unasked answer/too niche/insert other reason) are a majority.
The fact is, people are herd animals, which is why there are some super popular cartridges, and people are creative, which is why there are so many "other" cartridges. Popular ones fill many needs pretty well, and "others" fill specific needs spectacularly, or do most everything ok but focus on this or that, or just plain suck, but are interesting... |
September 27, 2012, 09:37 PM | #94 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 969
|
I guess I didn't get the memo that it wasn't popular.
|
September 27, 2012, 09:39 PM | #95 |
Member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 42
|
When the 10 was made it was a hot cartridge. It was like having a 357 magnum that held in my case 16 rounds. People couldn't handle the recoil so they downloaded them. Then the Fbi wanted them and the female agents and people with small hands had trouble handling it. So they came up with the 40 s&w. Take a look at the specs for they original Been 10. They were powerful guns.
__________________
Hey I didn't do it. It was like that when I got here. http://community.webshots.com/user/454me |
September 27, 2012, 10:27 PM | #96 |
Member
Join Date: February 9, 2012
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 58
|
I was just out with my 10 mm tonight. I own a SW 1086 and 1076 and a Colt delta Elite. It's an awesome round...just look at the ballistics charts. MY goal is to own all of the SW3rd gen 10 mm. a Bren 10 and a Colt Delta Elite. I am working to a 5 year plan. And... whoever said it was almost as powerful as a 357? Are you kidding me? Check your facts..
Last edited by mrbentley57; September 27, 2012 at 10:35 PM. |
September 27, 2012, 10:44 PM | #97 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
Again with the myth of the 10mm as being more powerful than a .357?
|
September 27, 2012, 10:55 PM | #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
It can be up there with the best .357 loads, and is better than many with regard to energy and momentum.
The .357 will almost always enjoy the advantage in sectional density, and get the benefits of trajectory and penetration that result from that. So I wouldn't call it a myth, as it can have some truth to it. |
September 27, 2012, 10:58 PM | #99 |
Member
Join Date: February 9, 2012
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 58
|
Ok where that ballistics chart does a 357 magnum have more velocity and force than a 10mm...?
Please tell me where you see that ?? |
September 27, 2012, 11:00 PM | #100 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 432
|
There was a post on this forum some where of a guy using buffalo bore in a Coonan and getting 900 foot pounds. I am getting close to that with my 357 magnum Desert Eagle (same 6 inch barrel but its gas operated)
Found the link http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...ghlight=coonan That is with a light bullet but that is a lot of energy (for a nonhunting handgun) I bet the 10mm could do the same thing if you put a 125 grain bullet in it but I doubt it would work well with a bullet that light. as to why the 10mm is not popular... its "too big" for people and a marginal for bear. That seems to be what most people these days care about.
__________________
Always looking for a good hunt! Last edited by CCCLVII; September 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM. Reason: found the link |
|
|