February 15, 2012, 11:45 PM | #2001 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,847
|
Al Norris wrote:
Doesn't matter. Congressman Issa directly challenged Holder. Issa blinked. The letter merely confirms that this is all partisan political pandering. --------------------------- The saddest part of the thing is that Al Norris might be all too right, which leaves the political types pandering, while the people, the vast majority of whom are honest citizens, get screwed over, and over and over. |
February 16, 2012, 12:08 AM | #2002 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Even if the House voted to issue a contempt citation, it would go nowhere because DOJ enforces them (discussed here before). It would also raise serious constitutional problems because of separation of powers. It was maybe three years ago or so where DOJ searched the office a crooked Congressman and the courts suppressed the evidence because of the separation of powers issue. My memory on this is a bit hazy but that was the gist of the problem.
|
February 16, 2012, 12:38 AM | #2003 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
|
|
February 16, 2012, 09:39 AM | #2004 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
|
February 16, 2012, 02:19 PM | #2005 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
The house would have the chief counsel (someone like Jay Sekulow) to take responsibility for the delivery of the subpoena. He would give it to a process server, unless he delighted in doing such things himself. The house can serve this without the DOJ as they can appoint independent prosecutors etc. What they would do if they failed to comply is anyone's guess. They have not complied so far. No one in the executive seems even the slightest interest in enforcing the law and punishing those responsible for breaking it. Selling guns to drug dealers is apparently ok.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
February 16, 2012, 02:32 PM | #2006 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
|
|
February 16, 2012, 02:48 PM | #2007 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
KyJim, you are correct. The House has no authority to appoint a prosecutor. It can o ly request that DOJ do so (as if). There is currently no special prosecutor statute on the books, and to enact another one would require approval by both houses of Congress and a presidential siggy. Can you say un-bloody likely?
|
February 16, 2012, 05:14 PM | #2008 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
There are three forms of contempt actions that can be taken by Congress:
|
February 16, 2012, 05:25 PM | #2009 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
Reading the Sipsey Street Irregulars occasionally throughout this story, as a source of fresh information, I wonder if the recent rumors suggesting that Boehner may be stalling the investigation for a politically motivated fall impeachment of Holder carry any weight.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
February 16, 2012, 07:17 PM | #2010 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,847
|
KyJim:
If memory serves, it doesn't always, note the following: 1. It was the FBI that searched the congressman's office, finding $90,000 or so in a refer. 2. I believe the congressman, from Louisiana, went to jail. |
February 16, 2012, 07:20 PM | #2011 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,847
|
gc70:
How much is that "bit more time", and when does "slow walking" cross the line between contempt and non "contemptuous" stalling, or whatever else might be charged? |
February 16, 2012, 07:26 PM | #2012 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
My bad. I forgot that the Office of the Independent Council is no more.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
February 16, 2012, 07:32 PM | #2013 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: South CA
Posts: 566
|
Quote:
Unlike Alcee Hastings, the law is such that Jefferson cannot run for another office due to a felony conviction. Hastings, a current member of Congress, was convicted of bribery while a judge...a federal judge, IIRC, but maybe just a state jurist. He was defrocked, but ran for Congress and was elected. He might be more useful to his sponsors in Congress than on the bench, but I speculate. Not sure about Jefferson's whereabouts these days.
__________________
Loyalty to petrified opinions never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul in this world — and never will. — Mark Twain |
|
February 16, 2012, 07:47 PM | #2014 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 301
|
Jefferson has still not served any time of his 9 year conviction. Ridiculous.
|
February 16, 2012, 07:50 PM | #2015 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
I trust that Issa has much better legal information and counsel on the subject of Congressional contempt charges than most, or any, of us on TFL. |
|
February 17, 2012, 12:59 AM | #2016 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,847
|
gc70 Quote:
Originally Posted by alan How much is that "bit more time", and when does "slow walking" cross the line between contempt and non "contemptuous" stalling, or whatever else might be charged? alan, I don't know the answers to your questions. But if I were charged with contempt under 2 USC 192, the first element of my defense would be that I did not "willfully" fail to produce documents. I trust that Issa has much better legal information and counsel on the subject of Congressional contempt charges than most, or any, of us on TFL. ------------------------ Re your last, I would most certainly hope so, but then ...? |
February 17, 2012, 01:05 AM | #2017 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,847
|
HarrySchell
Senior Member wrote, quoting yours truly, Join Date: March 30, 2007 Location: South CA Posts: 353 Quote: KyJim: If memory serves, it doesn't always, note the following: 1. It was the FBI that searched the congressman's office, finding $90,000 or so in a refer. 2. I believe the congressman, from Louisiana, went to jail. ----------------------------- The cash was found in his refer at home, hence the nickname "Cold Cash" Jefferson. It was FBI and what they found in the office helped send the...gentleman...to jail. Unlike Alcee Hastings, the law is such that Jefferson cannot run for another office due to a felony conviction. Hastings, a current member of Congress, was convicted of bribery while a judge...a federal judge, IIRC, but maybe just a state jurist. He was defrocked, but ran for Congress and was elected. He might be more useful to his sponsors in Congress than on the bench, but I speculate. Not sure about Jefferson's whereabouts these days. __________________ Mr. Hastings was, I believe, a federal judge. Former U.S.S. Arlen Specter was involved in his impeachment, as I recall. As for Jefferson, another poster offered the following: mayosligo writes: Jefferson has still not served any time of his 9 year conviction. Ridiculous. |
February 17, 2012, 09:10 AM | #2018 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
I think we all watched as Emily Miller (senior editor of the opinion page at Washington Times) got her gun!
Now she has opined on Obama's new budget recently submitted to Congress: MILLER: Obama’s fast and furious spin Quote:
|
|
February 17, 2012, 12:45 PM | #2019 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Did a little Google-Fu. As a couple have mentioned, the FBI did search Jefferson's Congressional offices (not where the cash was found) and seized documents and records. Jefferson, with support from members of Congress, asked the court to suppress the search, citing the Speech and Debate Clause and separation of power. The district court denied the motion and upheld the search. Jefferson was later convicted.
Thanks for helping me sort that out in my mind. |
February 17, 2012, 12:49 PM | #2020 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
|
|
February 17, 2012, 12:55 PM | #2021 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
DOJ received Rosemary Award for worst open govt performance
This week the Department of Justice received the Rosemary Award for worst open government performance. The award, named after Rosemary Woods, Richard Nixon's secretary who infamously took the fall for a 17 1/2 minute gap in a key Watergate tape, is given annually by the George Washington University National Security Archive.
Great accomplishment for Eric Holder... http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...SER_story.html |
February 17, 2012, 01:05 PM | #2022 | |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
Yet someone decided to strip the law that forbids it from happening again out of the proposed Presidential budget? Who did that? Gnomes? |
|
February 17, 2012, 01:20 PM | #2023 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
Janet Napolitano questioned about Fast & Furious and the death of agent Zapata
The hearing on President Obama’s 2013 proposed budget for the Department of Homeland Security turned into an inquiry about Fast & Furious and specifically about Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata's murder.
http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2012...ous-gun-sting/ One of the things that bothers me about her "mistakes were made" comments is that on her first trip to the Hill, she said she knew almost nothing of Fast & Furious, didn't talk to Eric Holder about it, Eric Holder didn't talk to her... According to her, no one from DEA, FBI, or ATF talked to her. She was like Sergeant Schultz from Hogan's Heroes But now she knows enough about it to say "mistakes were made" and insinuate that it's time to move on... And if mistakes were really made, should the budget try to repeal the prohibition of using funds to walk guns? Last edited by C0untZer0; February 17, 2012 at 01:29 PM. |
February 17, 2012, 01:56 PM | #2024 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
Moved to Obama's Anti-Gun Budget Bill thread.
Last edited by gc70; February 17, 2012 at 09:13 PM. |
February 17, 2012, 03:24 PM | #2025 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
Alloy
"I wonder if the recent rumors suggesting that Boehner may be stalling the investigation for a politically motivated fall impeachment of Holder carry any weight. " On another forum I saw a good piece that asserts that Boehner has reached a deal with administration for use F&F as an election tool, but to not enforce the subpeona, and that is why Issa has not filed contempt charges. I don't know the validity of the argument, but the writer urged all to write to Boehner objecting to the deal. It was well written and seemed plausible. I hope it is not. |
Tags |
atf , fast and furious |
|
|