|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 30, 2012, 06:22 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Can a misfeeding Ruger Mark II magazine be revived?
I have a total of four magazines for my Ruger MKII512. A couple of years ago I discovered that one of them consistently misfeeds one or two rounds per mag, and now another one does as well. I have cleaned them inside and out (with disassembly) but the problem persists. The remaining two magazines function fine.
Does anyone know the common cause of feeding issues and if/how the magazine might be tweaked to correct this? When a misfeed occurs, the old brass usually fails to eject and gets stuck behind the next round, which gets partway into the chamber. Holding the bolt back, you can usually pluck out the old brass and then let the bolt go to seat the next round. Last edited by spacecoast; December 30, 2012 at 06:51 PM. |
December 30, 2012, 07:19 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,419
|
A friend of mine has a 22/45 mag that he dropped once, it's never fed right since. He's showed it to everyone to find any damage but it's just not there, still it won't feed properly for crap.
Thanks for making me aware that I only have one mag for my MKII.
__________________
There's only one... |
December 30, 2012, 07:54 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Posts: 12
|
MK II Mag feed problem
Try rounding off the sharp inner edges of the magazine.(open area where cartridge is visible). Use small file or Dremel type tool with cutoff disc or small grinding wheel. Simulate front opening / grind a smaller radius. This operation worked wonders with my MK II's. 24 magazines.
Oswald |
December 30, 2012, 10:38 PM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
|
Are the rounds that misfeed the last 2 or is it just random? If it is the last several rounds you need a new spring. On the rounds that fail to eject, are they getting hooked by the extractor and being pulled out and being struck by the next round out of the mag?
|
December 30, 2012, 10:53 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
Examine both the extractor and its spring (.22's are very dirty, things get sticky very quickly), and the ejector. One other thing to try, is a new box of cartridges...I have an old brick of .22's that fire, but do not have the required power/force for the empties to clear the chamber of my Buckmark. |
|
December 31, 2012, 07:33 AM | #6 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by spacecoast; December 31, 2012 at 08:26 AM. |
||
December 31, 2012, 09:49 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
|
Be very aware of muzzle direction and trigger discipline when performing those tests. I suggest doing this outside.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter. |
December 31, 2012, 09:58 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 525
|
What kind of ammo are you using and what is the shape of the bullet? I have noticed problems with truncated cone bullets on my 22/45.
|
December 31, 2012, 02:08 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: The shores of Lake Huron
Posts: 4,783
|
I have an old Mark I mag that has always been problematic also. The original one has never failed and neither has a cheap Ramline Hi-cap with "constant-force spring." I could never figure it out either.
__________________
Stevie-Ray Join the NRA/ILA I am the weapon; my gun is a tool. It's regrettable that with some people those descriptors are reversed. |
December 31, 2012, 02:42 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2012
Posts: 397
|
Don't know if it applies here, but according to articles I've read on designs for .22 RF magazines, and why many older designs were never reliable, stated that retention at the forwards portion of the feed lips was a key factor.
Some more reliable .22 mag lips have small nibs or indentations near the front. Been awhile since I've owned a Ruger autoloader, mine was never particularly accurate so I sold it off long ago. I remember mine as being extremely reliable with the original mag and a 12 round replacement. It would even feed .22 Shorts flawlessly so long as I put only six in the magazine, and tapped the mag to shift the rounds towards the front. The Rugeris a great design, but just never felt right in my hand, far too bulky for a .22. |
December 31, 2012, 08:20 PM | #11 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
December 31, 2012, 11:27 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 1999
Posts: 966
|
one last thing to try.
since you took them apart already. swap the guts of a known good one with a known bad one and see if you can replicate the problem with either mag. if it follows the internals, then swap the follower only. the part it follows or stays with is your problem. you may see if ruger will fix it. |
|
|