The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 24, 2007, 09:50 AM   #1
All in moderation
Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 74
.308 muscle

I can not find the rifle that I want in a 30-06 cal but can get it in a .308 version. I know that the differences in those two cal. is spliting hairs, but I elk hunt and like using a 180 grn. bullet. A bullet in that weight just seems to limit the .308 more than I would like. Does anyone have any ideas how to improve the performance of the .308 with a 180 grn bullet, or have a different bullet suggestion?
All in moderation is offline  
Old January 24, 2007, 11:28 AM   #2
rantingredneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,728
I would think a good quality bonded bullet would do the job on Elk out of a
.308. Look at your controlled expansion loads. You can either handload them to your own specs which may get you an increase over standard factory velocities or you could look at some of the light magnum factory offerings from makers like Hornady. As you say the difference between an '06 and .308 is splitting hairs (amounts to about 100fps in comparable loads). Bottom line, with good quality bullets intended for large game it will do the job if you do your part.
rantingredneck is offline  
Old January 24, 2007, 07:50 PM   #3
hpg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 2002
Location: in the Bluegrass State
Posts: 1,610
Nosler makes great bullets for controlled expansion.......hpg
__________________
NRA member
Semper Paratus
hpg is offline  
Old January 24, 2007, 10:32 PM   #4
Ruger4570
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2005
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 2,136
I have shot a few elk in my day and I normally use a bigger gun anyways. That said, the 308 will tag any elk I have ever seen with good shot placement. I generally use Nosler Partitions for hunting as I have always had good luck with them. There may be better ones and lesser ones, it is just that Nosler have never let me down.
Ruger4570 is offline  
Old January 26, 2007, 10:45 AM   #5
hunter5325
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Posts: 8
I have used 150gr and 165gr Hornady Interbonds on elk with excellent results out of a 30-06. If these shot accurately in your gun, I wouldn't hesitate to use them on elk.
hunter5325 is offline  
Old January 26, 2007, 06:24 PM   #6
mrawesome22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
What kind of gun do you want? I would look around. There are many fine rifles to be had in .30-06. But anyway, you're only losing about 100fps with the .308Win. You're not going to notice this in the field or on paper. I'd be going for accuracy over velocity anyway and the .308Win has a long reputation for great accuracy. Now if you want to go higher than 180's, I'd definitely go with the .30-06.
mrawesome22 is offline  
Old February 1, 2007, 08:50 AM   #7
All in moderation
Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 74
I'm looking for a 30-06 in a target or varmint style rifle. 26" med. heavy or heavy barrel, with a good trigger and action. If anyone knows of a production rifle of that style let me know.
All in moderation is offline  
Old February 1, 2007, 01:31 PM   #8
cheygriz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2002
Location: high up in the rockies
Posts: 2,289
In the old days, I hunted elk with 180 gr bullets. Today, I use the 150 grain Barns "X" bullet.

These will drop an elk as quickly, or perhaps quicker, than any 180, and they can be driven much faster, giving flatter trajectory. And the .30 cal 150gr Barnes "X" will outpenetrate any 180 grain load except a 180 Barnes "X."

Another option for the .308 is the 165 partition from Nosler.
__________________
If you think a mighty military force is expensive, wait 'til you see what a weak one costs.

Last edited by cheygriz; February 1, 2007 at 01:33 PM. Reason: sp
cheygriz is offline  
Old February 1, 2007, 02:39 PM   #9
tINY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 26, 2005
Location: Orygun
Posts: 2,589

If you get the Rem700 short action, you have lattitude to seat the bullet out further - longish magazine and long throat.

But I wouldn't worry about it. A modern 165gr pill should be fine for Elk. They are big, but not particularly tough like a Griz or Boar.




-tINY

tINY is offline  
Old February 1, 2007, 09:33 PM   #10
mrawesome22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
The Remington 700 Sendero SF II comes in that configuration, but not in 30-06. It comes in .300WinMag though. Plenty for elk. I can't imagine why anyone would want such a heavy gun for elk hunting. It wears me out carrying around my VLS just walking around in fields hunting groundhogs. I hope you know what you're in for. By the time you get a scope, rings, loaded mag, bipod, sling on that thing, it's gonna feel like you're carrying an anchor around.
mrawesome22 is offline  
Old February 6, 2007, 11:05 PM   #11
All in moderation
Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 74
I had a Remington Sendaro in a 300 winchester mag. I carried it for almost a month straight elk hunting in the Rockies. Loved the rifle, and I didn't notice the weight any more than any other rifle I have ever carried. The problem with the 300 mag, is that I shoot a lot on the off season, and boy does it ever burn through the powder. The same rifle in a 30-06 is just what I am looking for.
All in moderation is offline  
Old February 6, 2007, 11:24 PM   #12
Trapper L
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 804
If you are into reloading and a wildcat doesn't scare you, have the 308 reamed out to a 30/284 Winchester. It should be a simple reaming and then loading dies. Ballistics would be identical to a 3006 as the case capacity is identical to a 3006. One of the benefits would be a shorter action which lends to a more accuracte rifle. Just a thought.
Trapper L is offline  
Old February 6, 2007, 11:49 PM   #13
Ruger4570
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2005
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 2,136
Trapper: I made a 35-284 that will equal a 35 Whelen all day. The 284 case is great as a basis for many wildcats..Mine made a great Elk gun and I have dropped 4 of them so far, with the worst case scenerio of him taking 5 or 6 steps before he collapsed.
Ruger4570 is offline  
Old February 7, 2007, 10:30 AM   #14
The Gamemaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2007
Posts: 135
You aren't going to want to lug that heavy rifle around.

Even if you do, if you use a guide service that packs you in. They give you a weight limit for your gear, and I would rather carry a couple of necessities than a heavy barrel rifle.

People use mystical terms when they think of hunting elk. All you really have to think about is that it is a BIG DEER. It's not a moose or a Buffalo, just a big deer.

You aren't going to impress him anymore if you shoot him with a .270 or a .375 H&H Magnum.

One good well placed shot is all you will need, and a elk is a pretty good sized target.....
The Gamemaster is offline  
Old February 8, 2007, 11:33 PM   #15
pumpkinheaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 294
Never used them myself but I bet a 165 partition or 165 or 168 TSX would work great on elk.
__________________
Just because your paranoid don't mean they aint out to get ya.
pumpkinheaver is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05543 seconds with 10 queries