|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 15, 2012, 05:44 PM | #101 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
All these people want to be scared about courts and reloads, getting sued after shooting, help in aftermath of lega crap, etc, etc and etc. if you're so scared of everything maybe you should leave your guns at home and start carrying a fly swatter.
|
September 15, 2012, 05:53 PM | #102 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
|
September 15, 2012, 06:12 PM | #103 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
It's merely a question of being prepared. Folks here spend enormous amounts of time and energy trying to pick just the right gun, the right cartridge, the right holster, etc. Yet some some of those same people are reluctant to spend time learning to understand the legal issues and prepare for the possibility that they might have to fact the legal travail that will come if they every have to actually use that gun they spent some much time and effort to select. Whether or not you want to bother learning about how the legal system works and whether there are things you can do to avoid unpleasant results if you happen to get involved with the legal system is entirely up to you. Of course, folks who carry or have guns for self defense probably are a little more likely than most other folks to come into contact with the legal system. But in any case, it won't be my problem. I know that a number of my colleagues made a good deal of their money trying to sort out messes for folks who never worried about lawyers or courts -- messes, and legal expenses, that perhaps could have been avoided or minimized with a little care or attention. But at least that lack of care and attention helped enrich my colleagues.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
September 15, 2012, 07:23 PM | #104 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Quote:
You pretty much make it as though a shooter is guilty until proven innocent. |
|
September 15, 2012, 07:44 PM | #105 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
[1] It is true that you will not have the final say on whether or not your use of lethal force was legally justified. The matter will be investigated. [2] If the DA and/or grand jury conclude that there is probable cause to believe that your intentional act of violence was a criminal act and not legally justified, you will be prosecuted. That is a true statement. [3] That is not to say that every use of force in self defense will be prosecuted. If the DA and/or grand jury conclude that you were justified to intentionally shoot that person, you will not be prosecuted. [4] But in any case, intentionally hurting or killing another person is prima facie a criminal act. Our law recognizes that under some conditions such an intentional act of violence may be legally justified and thus relieve the actor of criminal responsibility. But if claiming self defense you will of necessity have admitted that you intentionally hurt or killed another human being. Your defense will be that your act of violence was legally justified. Thus unless and until your act of violence is determined to be justified, it will be investigated and processed as a crime. [5] How Pleading Self Defense Works If You Are Charged In general, if you're accused of a crime it's up to the State to prove your guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But things work a little differently if you are pleading self defense. Basically -- [a] The prosecutor must prove the elements of the underlying crime beyond a reasonable doubt -- basically that you intentionally shot the guy. But if you are pleading self defense, you will have admitted that, so we go to step b. [b] Now you must present evidence from which the trier of fact could infer that your conduct met the applicable legal standard justifying the use of lethal force in self defense. Depending on the State, you may not have to prove it, i. e., you may not have to convince the jury. But you will have to at least present a prima facie case, i. e., sufficient evidence which, if true, establishes that you have satisfied all legal elements necessary to justify your conduct. [c] Now it's the prosecutor's burden to attack your claim and convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that you did not act in justified self defense. Let's go through that again. In an ordinary criminal prosecution, the defendant doesn't have to say anything. He doesn't have to present any evidence. The entire burden falls on the prosecution. The prosecution has to prove all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If the crime you're charged with is, for example, manslaughter, the prosecution must prove that you were there, you fired the gun, you intended to fire the gun (or were reckless), and the guy you shot died. In the typical manslaughter prosecution, the defendant might by way of his defense try to plant a seed that you weren't there (alibi defense), or that someone else might have fired the gun, or that it was an accident. In each case the defendant doesn't have to actually prove his defense. He merely has to create a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors. But if you are going to be claiming self defense, you will wind up admitting all the elements of what would, absent legal justification, constitute a crime. You will necessarily admit that you were there, that you fired the gun, and that you intended to shoot the decedent. Your defense is that your use of lethal force in self defense satisfied the applicable legal standard and that, therefore, it was justified. So now you would have to affirmatively present evidence from which the trier of fact could infer that your conduct met the applicable legal standard justifying the use of lethal force in self defense. In some jurisdictions, you may not have to prove it, i. e., you don't have to convince the jury. But you will at least have to present a prima facie case, i. e., sufficient evidence which, if true, establishes that you have satisfied all elements necessary under the applicable law to justify your conduct. Then it will be the prosecutor's burden to attack your claim and convince the jury (in some jurisdictions, he will have to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt) that you did not act in justified self defense. And even if you didn't have to prove self defense (only present a prima facie case), the less convincing your story, and your evidence, is, the easier it will be for the prosecutor to meet his rebuttal burden.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||
September 15, 2012, 07:56 PM | #106 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
Thanks for not hijacking this thread. Again, I carry 155 grain federal hydra shoks in my 40 cal. I have most every kind of ammo out there and all are prob just as good but I killed alot of animals with these and I seen firsthand their destruction. Plus I have about 75 boxes of the stuff.
|
September 15, 2012, 08:06 PM | #107 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15, 2012, 08:14 PM | #108 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
@farmerboy - I carry 135 gr Hydra Shoks in my LC9. It shoots great with less perceived recoil than when I use Hornady or Winchester PDX in my LC9.
|
September 15, 2012, 08:20 PM | #109 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
I also have a box of 135 gr hydra shok 40 cal and would carry 135s but have to buy them. You just about name it I pretty much have almost everything but carry what's free and that's what the FBI has provided me with. Long story but it seems like free and endless supply always shoots better ;-)
|
September 15, 2012, 08:23 PM | #110 | ||
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
Quote:
Quote:
One of the points that I think Frank is trying to get at is this: The shooter is not the final arbiter of whether a shoot was good. That role falls to someone else (judge, DA, jury, etc). Bear in mind that the prosecutor is not required to believe the shooter's side of the story. If I shoot a BG, who survives, and the BG survives and tells a different tale than I do, a prosecutor could well decide just to let a jury sort it out. (Sometimes, that's the politically safe move.) There could also be all sorts of political pressure for a DA to charge.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
||
September 15, 2012, 08:33 PM | #111 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Quote:
The prosecutor is required to take the evidence presented upon them to make their decision. It does not mean 100% of the time they will believe the shooter but the other side of that it does not mean they will not believe them either. |
|
September 15, 2012, 08:34 PM | #112 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
Who gives a crap? If I was staff like Frank, I'd ban both of you for a week just for being disrespectful to this post for so long. Back to it, yes I love the 135 grain hydra skoks in 40 cal.
|
September 15, 2012, 08:39 PM | #113 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
Quote:
With all of the research work that we (meaning CCers) put into gear, calibers, training, etc., one of the common themes is "hope for the best, but prepare for the worst," is it not? I treat the legal issues the same way.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
September 15, 2012, 08:40 PM | #114 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
farmerboy - I started the thread and I think the discussion is valid. Plus Frank Ettin is part of the discussion.
About the hydra shoks - I did not know that the 40 cal came in 135 gr also. Mine is in 9mm. |
September 15, 2012, 08:41 PM | #115 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2012
Posts: 335
|
Possible Situation?
Prosecuting Lawyer: "And sir, do you mind telling the jury what type of ammo you used when you shot and killed my client?" Defense: "Sure, I used my hollow-points." Prosecuting Lawyer: "Hollow-Point. Do you mind explaining what that is?" Defense: "Sure, it expands when fired to produce a larger diameter projectile" Prosecuting Lawyer: "So you are saying it has the potential to cause more harm and has a better chance at killing someone?" Defense: "Well yes I suppose. If someone is trying to kill me, I would like the fight to be as unfair as possible." Think of it first as a friendly sport tournament, such as tennis for example. If money was not a priority, are you going to go buy the cheapest/worst tennis racket you can find before the tournament? Probably not, you will want the best you can find because you want the upper hand. Now put your life on the line as a wager to this tournament.......
__________________
"Vegetarian, an old Indian word for bad hunter." |
September 15, 2012, 08:43 PM | #116 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
September 15, 2012, 08:55 PM | #117 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Quote:
There is no ruling or law that states you cannot present your side of the story if your reloads come into question if you happen to be involved in a shooting. |
|
September 15, 2012, 09:02 PM | #118 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
Yes 40 cal hydra shoks do come in 135 gr also. I love them. They have less kick and bad to the bone. But like I said, I shoot the 155 correction 165 gr hydra shoks.
|
September 15, 2012, 09:21 PM | #119 | ||
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
Quote:
We may need a GSR expert to tell us "what does the GSR say?" The problem is that any testing done by an expert will have to be done by an expert who is relying on my word that the rounds were loaded as I said they were. Again, we're talking about having an expert testify as to rounds created by a potential defendant. Or basing his conclusions on what the defendant says was in the load. Were I lead counsel on that case, what I'd really like is for a neutral third party to testify as to the composition of the lot used in the shooting for GSR testing purposes.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
||
September 15, 2012, 09:28 PM | #120 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Quote:
There is no absolute. You can't just paint one side and expect others to take it as fact. |
|
September 15, 2012, 09:32 PM | #121 | ||
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
Quote:
Are you contending that there is no such risk?
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. Last edited by Spats McGee; September 15, 2012 at 09:35 PM. Reason: Spelling |
||
September 15, 2012, 09:49 PM | #122 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
I never said there were no risk.
I pointed out your statement that handloads could get the shooter in trouble and the shooter will not be allowed to present their load data as evidence. Also, your statements imply that statements made by the shooter will not be taken as the truth by the prosecutor. Those as not hard facts, they are your opinion. |
September 15, 2012, 10:12 PM | #123 | ||
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,819
|
Quote:
As far as load data, I've looked for cases in which a handloader's data has been allowed in, or in which GSR testing based on a handloader's data was allowed in. I've never found one. All of the cases on this issue that I've ever seen point toward exclusion. If you've got a case that says it should be admitted, I'll be glad to read it. For that matter, if you have any information or leads on a case that point to admission, give me the information and I'll even try to track it down for you. Quote:
I'm not asking you to agree with my risk assessment, M. You are by no means required to. However, throughout much of this thread, it appeared to me that you were taking the position that there was absolutely no basis for legal concerns about handloads. As I've stated, there is a particular set of circumstances under which the handloads issue can present itself. Unfortunately, if and when it does, it has the potential to be a really big problem for the shooter.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
||
September 15, 2012, 10:21 PM | #124 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
If one were to keep detailed records, i.e. a "foundation," regarding reloading activity, experience, date, bullet, brass, powder, charge, source of load data, labels, remaining ammunition supporting your contentions, you would have an excellent evidentiary basis to have the reload data/evidence admitted under at least two or more exceptions: business record, contemporaneous recording, and custom and habit.
|
September 15, 2012, 10:31 PM | #125 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Posts: 2,088
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://thedailyreview.com/news/shave...hter-1.1352848 Here's another. http://www.gunatics.com/forums/gener...mas-ayoob.html Last edited by Marquezj16; September 15, 2012 at 10:43 PM. |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|