|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 30, 2015, 03:16 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Have you heard of this man? Gary Kleck.
As I research counter arguments to the odious proposals being bandied around the Brussels corridors of power I came across an erstwhile gun-control advocate who, courtesy of being judicious in his proof of concept methodology, reviewed 41 research papers on gun control.
The abstract to this 2014 paper by Gary Kleck (and the whole report it seems) can be seen through this link, but the upshot of it is that he found no clear correlation between higher gun ownership and higher gun crime rates, including homicides. Other anti-gun academics have commented that whilst they don't like the conclusions drawn from the report they can't deny the methodology and, therefore, findings of this report. I thought members might find it interesting.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
November 30, 2015, 03:20 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
I thought that Glenn Meyer had responded in a much earlier thread on a related subject that he knows him.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
November 30, 2015, 03:30 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quite possibly. He was a new name for me but having had his own research ostensibly changing his view on a situation that typically has people entrenched I thought was unusual. His conclusion is also relelvant to my current situation.
And if Prof. Kleck is reading and wants to respond to the EU proposal we are battling.........
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
November 30, 2015, 05:07 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Yes, I've met and corresponded with him in my professional role.
He wrote the excellent book - Point Blank, which is one of the first modern mainstays of how civilian guns promote self defense. There are been more and quite a few peer reviewed articles. Point Blank won a major sociology award when it was published. Of course, antigun scholars hate his work. The biggest controversy revolves around his estimate of the number of DGUs per year. I suggest one search for his book on Amazon and his articles on Google scholar. A must read for those who want to seriously discuss why we have the 2nd Amend. and civilian guns beyond just saying it is a God Given right.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
November 30, 2015, 06:10 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
He's a professor at University of Florida. Some of his early research showed that violent crime in Florida dropped around 20% in Florida after the statewide CCW law was enacted.
__________________
As always, YMMV. __________________________________________ MIIAA SIFE |
December 1, 2015, 01:56 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Am I right that he was initially anti-gun, but changed his position as a result of his own findings?
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
December 1, 2015, 02:17 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
From the preface to a 1993 interview with Dr. Kleck:
Quote:
|
|
December 1, 2015, 02:44 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
|
Amazing how an intelligent man, with research skills, can come to conclusions!
Said conclusions that are backed up by real numbers. But numbers that come from main stream media? Not so much, for instance the amount of times a good person with a gun wins over a home invading criminal. Does not surface often. |
December 2, 2015, 05:35 PM | #9 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|