June 1, 2011, 10:40 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 386
|
Frangible rounds.
Is frangible ammo just for target shootin, or can it be used for SD? I mean im know it can but how Would it perform? I have always been scared of something going down in a gas station or public place and there being innocent by standards in the store getting hit with a pass through round. I know you should always know whats beyond your intended target but I think when put in that situation most ppl would just react and try to eliminate the target. I carry a 38 special everyday and im pretty sure that most of the time a belly shot or similar where the round dont hit a hard internal, its going to pass through.
I know the caliber carried can have alot to do with it but I really like my little airweight for everyday carry and dont plan on changing my carry gun. So, im not to familiar with this frangible round. How well do you guys think it would perform on human flesh or is it just for shootin steel?? WHat would be the best round for what im lookin for?? Right now im shootin winchester xp's. |
June 2, 2011, 06:44 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
now you see me, now you don't
Some frangible is designed to disintegrate at impact.
Some is designed for people-shooting, offering reduced penetration. Neither, IMNSHO, is appropriate for people-shooting. Stick with your Winchesters.
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
June 3, 2011, 11:22 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 1,449
|
frangible is like a solid point bullet, not made to expand. Not a great choice for SD. I've shot frangible at rocks and windshields and they turn to dust with no penetration. I've shot frangible through doors and wooden pallets with results similar to fmj. Generally speaking you need a hard surface like metal or glass to break up the round, it goes right through wood. Not sure about bones. I know a guy who took a deer with a 357 sig frangible.
|
June 4, 2011, 07:11 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 311
|
I read an article a few months ago talking about police officers using frangible rounds because they were designed to completely fragment upon impact, thus reducing the probability of overpenetration. It also stated that by the round completely fragmenting that more energy would be released on the target than that of hollow points or FMJ rounds. Since reading that article, I have been on the lookout for frangible rounds myself for SD.
__________________
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 4, 2011, 11:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2008
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 409
|
Frangible rounds are a poor choice as they do not penetrate deeply enough to ensure reaching vital organs. The notion that they would dump more energy into an attacker than a quality HP round is disingenuous at best, and downright wrong at worse. Until a HP creates an exit would the energy transfer is the same. Since most hallowpoints do not exit, the same amount of energy is dumped into the target.
|
June 5, 2011, 12:36 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Posts: 1,740
|
I read on the Internet that they don't work. So it must be true. I heard they just bounce of people, and just make them mad.
All I can say is, they are very light fast bullets out of a standard pressured shell. All I can say is, whoever made any comments on these should back it up. Last edited by 8shot357; June 5, 2011 at 04:23 PM. |
June 5, 2011, 01:17 AM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 23, 2011
Posts: 51
|
"RRLP ammunition may be of benefit for personnel conducting VBSS, GOPLAT, and in extremis missions in maritime environments or industrial settings with hazardous materials. Likewise, the use of frangible training ammunition is an important safety consideration for close range exercises using reactive steel targets. On the other hand, frangible training ammunition is NEVER a good choice for duty/self-defense use! Anyone recommending frangible training ammunition for duty/self-defense purposes is grossly misinformed or is ignorantly repeating specious gunrag myth and should be disregarded as a source of valid information…"
http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=57072 BUG's: .380 ACP vs. .38 Sp |
June 5, 2011, 12:57 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,176
|
Has there been ANY bona fide forensic reports of frangible ammo use and results in self defense or police related shootings? If not, what are we basing the neagatives on?
|
June 5, 2011, 02:05 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
The are different types of frangible ammunition: that made for reduced riccochet risk for training and that marketed specifically for self-defense. Self-defense marketed frangibles are characterized by Glaser, MagSafe, and Extreme Shock. In my opinion, frangible ammunition is a poor choice for self-defense outside of certain very specific circumstances (i.e. an air marshall using a handgun inside of a commercial jet).
The problem with frangible ammo is that it typically penetrates substantially less than premium JHP ammo does. Modern premium JHP ammo is designed to penetrate to a certain depth (usually the FBI standard of 12-16") and most of it works as designed. While that depth of penetration may seem excessive on its face, it has become industry standard because it is accounting for very large attackers, shots at oblique angles, and shots through extremities or intermediate barriers. While the wounds inflicted by frangible ammunition are quite gruesome looking and undobtedly extremely painful, they may not reliably reach the vital organs of an attacker and as such cannot be relied up to quickly incapacitate a large individual, an particularly determined individual, or an individual under the influence of mind-altering chemicals. The other issue with frangible ammo is that it's usually quite expensive. Last I looked, a package of Glaser or Magsafe ammo is roughly the same price as a box of premium JHP but usually comes in a package of 10 cartridges or less. The cost of shooting enough frangible ammo to ensure reliability, verify point of impact, and adjust sights as necessary would be prohibitively expensive for most people. Regardless of its performance, no ammo is going to do you any good if it doesn't work in your gun and/or you can't hit your target. As far as overpenetration is concerned, while it is not an issue to be completely ignored, it's not as big a deal as some make it out to be. According to the FBI report that came out when that agency adopted the 10mm cartridge in the early 90's, overpenetration is a phenomenon that was largely exaggerated by law enforcement in order to justify the use of politically-incorrect JHP ammunition. Personally, I'm much more worried about underpenetration than I am about overpenetration. By choosing when, where, and at what angle I choose to shoot, I can go a long way towards mitigating the risk of overpenetration. It is much easier to take a step to the side or to take a kneeling or prone position prior to pulling the trigger than it is to switch your ammunition in the middle of a fight. I have at least some control over the angle of my shot, but I have no control whatsoever over the size, temperment, position, or chemical use of my opponent. Last edited by Webleymkv; June 5, 2011 at 02:07 PM. Reason: spelling |
June 5, 2011, 05:33 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
|
I have shot water melon with it. They do work well but I still would take a SJHP.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull. all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well... |
June 5, 2011, 05:47 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 386
|
So basically its just for target shootin then.Thanks for the info. Like I said I have no experiance with it so I thought id ask
|
June 5, 2011, 09:12 PM | #12 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2007
Location: The South
Posts: 4,239
|
Quote:
So, since they are expensive, shoot to a different POI, and don't always perform as advertised, then they are about useless....my opinion of course. Lots of good .38 spl rounds. My favorite is Remington Express 158g +P LHP. Quote:
Last edited by madmag; June 5, 2011 at 09:20 PM. |
||
June 5, 2011, 09:33 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 5,177
|
Read post #9.
The Glaser/MagSafe/etc is marketed as SD ammo, and is quite pricey--$20/$25 per six rounds. Their penetration is minimal, and their effectiveness is questionable at best. Some other "frangible" rounds are just a compound designed to vaporize on impact, and are only good for target use. Quote:
Bottom line--use a good quality JHP for SD. |
|
June 6, 2011, 02:00 AM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Posts: 1,740
|
I believe everything I read.
|
June 6, 2011, 02:24 AM | #15 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 23, 2011
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Sure, most so-called "information" on the internet is actually misinformation, but we've known for a long time that frangible ammunition sucks for self defense. FWIW, you aren't going to find many reputable, if any..., cases of frangible ammunition being used in SD. |
|
June 6, 2011, 02:32 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2010
Posts: 579
|
Merc, MMA fighters routinely hit each other with 900+lbs of force. That doesn't stop the other guy from fighting. They keep coming. 450 pounds of force from a +p .45acp is not going to put a guy out of a fight. With a bullet it is about transfering that energy in to the CNS or vital organs. That requires penetration. I rather use FMJ than frangible. I prefer HPs over both. Bigger hole plus penetration.
__________________
Here's my credo: There are no good guns, There are no bad guns. A gun in the hands of a bad man is a bad thing. Any gun in the hands of a good man is no threat to anyone, except bad people. Charlton Heston |
June 6, 2011, 06:50 AM | #17 | |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
|
|
June 6, 2011, 10:08 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2007
Location: The South
Posts: 4,239
|
Not sure if this fits with the frangible ammo question, but I think it's worth mentioning.
I do use Hornady Critical Defense ammo. CD ammo has a polymer filler in the HP cavity to prevent being filled with material and this delays expansion until needed. From my personal testing, and reading, this ammo does exactly as advertised. You get reliable expansion but it does not penetrate some hard barriers as well as normal HP or ball ammo. Also, it shoots and hits POI just like any other ammo. And the price is not more than other premium HP ammo. I also find the shape (nose) of the CD ammo really enhances feeding in semi's. Agreed, anything Speer Gold Dot is also very good. That's my other go to ammo. |
June 6, 2011, 04:25 PM | #19 | |
Junior member
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Posts: 1,740
|
Quote:
|
|
June 6, 2011, 04:47 PM | #20 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 16, 2010
Posts: 1,141
|
frangible rounds are poor performers in ever test that's been done.
either they don't fragment and perform like a fmj bullet, or they do fragment and penetrate less than 9 inches. don't waste your money on these. |
June 10, 2011, 02:42 AM | #21 | |||
Junior member
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Posts: 1,740
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
June 10, 2011, 03:00 AM | #22 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 16, 2010
Posts: 1,141
|
^^are you new to guns, or the internet?
there's this website called google. use it. |
June 10, 2011, 03:34 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Frangible means fragile .I don't want to use anything fragile if I have to deal with a BG ! Use JHPs that's what they're designed for .
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
June 10, 2011, 07:27 AM | #24 | |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|