|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 21, 2009, 07:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2008
Location: Between Dallas and Shreveport, LA
Posts: 569
|
Should you work up a new load using virgin brass?
I'm about 3/4 through working up a new load for my rifle, and as I get ever nearer the MAX load shown in the manual, I suddenly thought -
"Wait a minute; I bet they didn't derive this pressure tested MAX using virgin brass. Once fired brass would have greater internal volume than virgin brass, because it has been fire formed to fit the chamber, and therefore can accept a higher charge of powder." True/false? I'm thinking I better stay a couple of grains below MAX, until I get some brass fire formed to my rifle chamber. What do you think?
__________________
Artillery lends dignity to what would otherwise be but a vulgar brawl. |
August 21, 2009, 07:14 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Posts: 897
|
why don't you start at the starting load like every manual ever says?
|
August 21, 2009, 07:15 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 3, 2008
Posts: 956
|
Most loads in the manuals are worked up in fully resized brass, so the new vs. fireformed issue, isn't a factor.
__________________
S&WCA member NRA member NAHC Life member |
August 21, 2009, 07:40 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
|
If you aren't measuring head expansion
then I don't think it makes much difference whether you use new brass or pre-fired brass (once or more than once).
The idea of measuring the volume of a fired case is to figure-out how big YOUR chamber is. The brass expands until the chamber stops it, and I don't think it makes much difference in peak pressure whether the brass starts at the chamber wall (i.e., neck-sized) or a few hundredths away (full-length sized). If you ARE measuring head expansion, tell us and I will explain the comment. SL1 |
August 22, 2009, 06:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2008
Location: Between Dallas and Shreveport, LA
Posts: 569
|
Reply to Kyo
I didn't say I started at 3/4 up between Min and Max load.
Let me clarify - I started at Min reloading manual load, and have worked up thru 4 intermediate loads, and now am about 3/4 of the way to the Max listed load. OK?
__________________
Artillery lends dignity to what would otherwise be but a vulgar brawl. |
August 22, 2009, 06:44 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Posts: 897
|
sorry about the confusion. manufacturers load their ammo to max specs, and that is virgin brass. so, it should be fine either way.
|
August 22, 2009, 09:49 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2007
Location: Tabor City , NC.
Posts: 1,969
|
for rifle laddering i prepare a batch of brass & hopefully before i use it up i have a load that the rifle likes.
__________________
GP100man |
August 24, 2009, 03:09 PM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 13
|
Yes.....there is a diff. I just ran into the same issue. Worked up loads for .308 using virgin Lapua Brass.....I fired 300 to get all fire formed cases then just neck sized....all else being the same, the neck sized pre-fired brass gives a different fps.
|
August 24, 2009, 03:14 PM | #9 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
(Just asking, no offense)
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
August 24, 2009, 03:19 PM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 13
|
Are you sure all else was the same. (atmospheric conditions...)
(Just asking, no offense) Good point......no, atmospheric conditions were not the same although similar, at least temperature. |
August 24, 2009, 03:25 PM | #11 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Well, I think that the temperature difference would have to be fairly significant to make a statistically significant difference in MV. So, you're probably right. I believe Sierra claims 1 fps per degree Fahrenheit.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
August 24, 2009, 08:28 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,425
|
Not a true/false question. I always try to see if new brass will chamber without sizing. If so, then I just neck size to get the proper bullet tension. Then the case is perfect for my chamber. My interpretation of maximum for my rifle, case, powder, bullet, primer combo is the head expansion of .005 greater than SAAMI specs. After that point, I've experienced the standard pressure signs on primers, extraction, etc. FYI, the five calibers that I load in the 308/30-06 family don't give the best accuracy with maximum loads. Only one that gives me the best accuracy at the top is the 7mm RM.
|
August 25, 2009, 07:39 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
|
GeauxTide,
You said you are looking for 0.005" of case head expansion as a pressure limit. Did you mean 0.0005". Or are you really measuring the expansion ring (on the case wall in front of the web a ways) instead of the head (solid part of the case between the web and extractor groove, with only the flash hole going through it)? I ask because others are probably reading this and looking for ideas to use themselves. Case head expansion of 0.005" would be WAY too much. Pressure ring expansion depends on YOUR chamber dimensions and its change from SAAMI specs means nothing from gun-to-gun. SL1 |
|
|